From my initial post here on this topic: "The 1st horizontal line is simply with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Etc. I have earlier spelled this out in vls roulette forum". Anyone can see how  a certain member there started to ask (reply #3) and colouring numbers. See also #8. In reply  #15 he started attaching sheets. In  the attached sheet of reply  #17 he seemed to have found the key.  And he is not a joker!!!!
I work in a kindergarten. Some of the kids are playing with colours and do not have much patience.

To whom it may concern:
Today at 02:14:52 PM in THIS forum I stated that we should take the time to read, think and understand before judging or posting.
Today at 02:23:18 PM  a certain member had already given up understanding.

I have just had a look at Peter Russell´s World Clock. The spinning numbers there can make you dizzy.  Time flies!

 I really thought he was a joker.  Now and then we should take the time to read, think and understand before judging or posting. A little clarification:  Here the 36 numbers belongs to a grid (6x6 spaces). Without having to colour anything,  you must  place 12 EXACTLY under 6. And so forth.  Please remember: Follow the development  both in the horizontal and vertical groups.  When a number comes, I simply write it in its proper place. And if it comes again, I cross it out.
With the previous version of the strategy I had a bad day the with 161 permanence of 2011 (12.06.2011, table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden): MINUS 190 chips.
With the newest version I lost only 14 chips that day..
The ninteen days (sessions) from 07.07.2011 to 25.07.2011 resulted in +93 chips with the previous version. With the new version: +137 chips.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on March 10, 2013, 05:07:16 PM
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36

Dane

Would you please quote this chart and color the "oners" one color and the "repeaters" another color?

Sam

In my first post of this topic I told you, that I earlier spelled something out in vls roulette forum. Suddenly I remember who I tried to explain it to. Must be a joker!

According to my latest testing this is even better: Heading for AT LEAST FOUR "oners" in a row OR
AT LEAST FOUR repeated numbers in a row 

Quote from: Badger on March 02, 2013, 04:01:38 PM
Thanks Dane
I'm going to do some testing.

Here are the results from the next eight days in my own test series: 5-20 5 23-10-63-32 9. I.e. the 18 sessions from 07.07.2011 to 24.07.2011 resulted in 95 chips. Compared to minus 463 chips (mentioned at the top of this page) that is something ! My new version passed what I considered to be "the acid test".

Not surprising I once again have started with the first spin of 2011. In theory the 31 sessions of January 2011 made me 63 chips richer.

Quote from: Badger on March 02, 2013, 08:40:56 AM
"five numbers in a row without a repeat"

Could you kindly show an example of this.

Regards
Bruce

Sure! Here I have chosen the first spins from 20.07.2011, table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden:
6, 3, 21, 33, 2, 19, 31, 7, 27, 21, 23, 16, 29, 0, 5, 6, 13, 30, 3, 22, 23, 27, 6, 25.

In the upper line of the grid 6, 3, 2 and 5 came. I started betting on 4. But in the next spin 6 repeated. I left 4.
AT LEAST five numbers in a row without a repeat turned up in the vertical group of 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31.
In this order: 19, 31, 7, 13 (here I started betting on 25)...and 25. This session ended here.
In the final spins I also betted 22 and 33.  22 could have repeated (21 and 23 repeated themselves)
And 33 could come again (21 and 27 did).

Repeaters seem to dominate from time to time. Maybe be cannot afford to ignore this simple fact.  So my new goal is at least five numbers in a row without any repeat - OR AT LEAST THREE REPEATED NUMBERS IN A ROW.
07.07.2011 (table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden): 29 spins. +29 chips. Winning on 3. Repeated numbers in a row: 1, 2, 3, 4.
08.07.2011. 25 spins. Winning on 3. +34 chips. Five numbers  without repeat: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
09.07.2011. 26 spins. Winning on 24.  +33 chips. 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 did not repeat.
10.07.2011. 50 spins. Winning on 10. -43 chips. Three repeated numbers 9, 10, 11.
11.07.2011. 25 spins. Winning on 13. +26 chips. Three repeated numbers in a row (vertical): 13, 19, 25.
12.07.2011. 26 spins. Winning on 22. +33 chips. Repeated numbers in a row: 21, 22, 23, 24.
13.07.2011. 29 spins. Winning on 20. +17 chips. Six numbers without repeat: 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24.
14.07.2011. 32 spins. Winning on 13. +13 chips. Three repeated numbers in a row (vertical): 7, 13, 19.
15.07.2011. 19 spins. Winning on 3.  +34 chips. 1, 2, 3 repeated themselves.
16.07.2011. 44 spins. Winning on 16. +12 chips. 14, 15, 16 repeated.

These ten sessions resulted in...........178 chips.
Thanks to monaco for his inspiration and support.

AMK: Take your time! I  myself am in Berlin as a tourist right now, so I am taking my time for other activities.

Once again I stick to flat betting and a grid. Line 1-6: 1-6. Line 2: 7-12. Etc.
When only four numbers out of six have come, there are 15 possible combinations. Probably the four numbers do not form two groups.  Only three combinations form two groups. For example 1&2 and 4&5. 1&2 and 5&6. 2&3 and 5&6. Nevertheless I  bet that four numbers form two such groups (flat betting). 
In the grid we have six horizontal and six vertical group. 3/15 X 12 = 2,4.  In average we should expect  to see the pattern 2,4 times. 2,4 hits
I end the session at the latest  when only seven numbers have not come.

For each session we need a grid (6x6). The first line contains 1-6. The second line consists of 7-12. Etc.
There are six horizontal and six vertical groups.  When I am winning, some number has just UNITED an isolated number with a group of numbers. I try to keep it simple. An example from the first line: 2, 4 and 5 came.  I then bet that 3 comes and unites the isolated 2 with 4&5. If 1 comes first, 2 is not isolated there anymore and must be abandoned.
The session ends, if only seven of the 36 numbers are missing.

To Ralph and monaco:  I have been rather   undecided.  And I am sorry to admit that Ralph may be right: STOPLOSS is not going to save us. Just look at the 18 sessions from 07.07.2011 to 24.07.2100, Spielbank Wiesbaden, table 3!

WITHOUT any stoploss: -102+31+22+8-70+7-12-58-6-1-58-43-53+16+3+9-38-118 = -463
   And WITH a stoploss: -100+31+22+8-99+7-12-58-6-1-58-43-53+16+3+9-38-98  =  -470 

To Vic: Sorry, I did not know that.
To Sam:  We are all trying to do our best.  Some people might understand things better in other words. Well done.            

To monaco: A stoploss might be valuable after all. Right after hit 184(06.07.2011): 647 chips (Without stoploss).
                                                                    Right after hit 202(24.07.2011): 201 chips.
Then my worst case so far: The first 64 spins from 25.07.2011. This session from Spielbank Wiesbaden resulted in -172 chips. In other words: 29 chips left!

My continued test series after exactly five months (at table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden): 379 chips. Three days later (03.06.2011): 451 chips.  10.06.2011: 183 chips.
After exactly six months (178 hits or sessions): 522 chips. 

monaco introduced the stoploss factor here . As promised I have analyzed my first 119 sessions again.  Neither stoploss -60  nor stoploss -100 made me richer compared to no stoploss. Stoploss -60 made me 19 units poorer. And stoploss -100 made be 7 units poorer.
So in my continued test series I intend to do without stoploss  .