True, Esoito, but there was a time when I would not quit as long as I had a dollar to bet.
Those days are over.

I left plenty to fight again.

I think that's called a non-sequitur..

huh

Yep, I Googled it..

Yep

This test is going very well........at present!!  I rarely go to a $30 unit mini-bank.  I am up almost 400 play unit.  600 to go...

HOOOOOOOOOOBOY.................

You talk about the RFH....I got it.

Lost back to 104.  Yuck.

The zero "came after me" with a vengeance!  Had I been playing RNG, I would have sworn they did it on purpose.

Starting the climb out again.

I should have quit when I saw things going bad.  I laid off 24 hours and things are back to normal.

Sam

Normy

Thanks for those kind words.  This has been a treat for me to test and explore.  It gets me up at 3 a.m. to check and re-set it.

I'm hoping to have $100 profit by the end of October.  That's betting mostly dimes, but later on, .20 per bet.

Sam

Yes, you are Mr. G.........

Normy put in a feature where you can change the cycle and count.  His testing showed 4/5 was better and it really is.

Sam

People

Here is a recent shot, although I am at around 170 now.  I started at 104, so I'm up almost 70 dollars which is 700 dimes/units.  I'm too lazy to do the study, but I'm sure the win rate is somewhere around 70%.  Not bad.  If this holds up, I'll be quite the happy geezer!!

Sam

B

Thanks for that explanation.  Now I will take Turner's word for it and leave it be..

Sam

I thought about this............

Say the most numbers in 37 spins came in the first dozen.  Assume there were 6.  Using the pattern that six produced, you would bet all 12 numbers in the first dozen, six in the second and six in the third.  That's 24 numbers. 

Is that the bet?  If not, would someone 'splain it?

Sam

Just an observation.................

Every graph I've ever seen than man post goes down and then way, way up.  Why do none just go up?

It is interesting and food for thought.   Hmmmmmmmmmm

Could food for thought be why I'm getting so fat??

Sam

Thanks, Buff One

No idea how that happened.  Too much Oolong tea??

Sam

Starting a new recording method, not a new test.

SLC Bot

maestro

I fully believe that you would never lose the 1,000.  I believe Jl was right; random has its limits.  Call it regression to the mean, if you will.

Anyway, a test is under way to see if that theory is true.  I will continue to post it.

Sam

Guys

A video will soon be posted to this thread.  While it is long, it would be to your benefit to watch it.  Attached here is the log sheet of all the runs I've done in the past week or so.  There are 87 of them.  There were more, but I went nuts and went to a .50 bet and did not have enough bankroll to cover my loses!!  So I started over at $104 and am now close to $150.

In the 87 trot study, five times the D'Alembert went to level 5.  From there it won.

There were 87 trots; 27 lost and 60 won.  That means that I won more than twice as often as I lost.

Who you gonna call................??

Sam

EDIT:  I missed and "L" so it's 28/59.  Who hoo!!  Also, the orange marks new highs.