Albalaha says,
after 100millions spins test,
the worst ever he could find,
is 256dozen/1000spins.

Thus taking 256dz/1000spins,
as the limit, we could make a strategy.

By applying BlueAngel's progression.

256dz minimum expectation
=256x2payout=512ME.


Thus in an OVERSIMPLIFIED example...
where the
first 744spin-lose
last 256spin=hit

we could bet 1u till 511st spin.
========================
spin--bet unit-losses---ME
1st....[1u].[-1u]....[512]

to the..

511st..[1u].[-511u]..[512]
512nd..[2u].[-513]..[1024]
513rd..[2u].[-515]..[1024]
514th..[2u].[-517]..[1024]
515th..[2u].[-519]..[1024]

...up to..

744th..[2u].[-977]..[1024]

and following are 256wins

after 256win=x2ux2=[+1024]
=+47unit profit...






===================

How about EC,
Albalaha say worst EC=405/1000.

thus by applying BlueAngel's ME progression...

spin..bet u..losses..ME
0...................[405]

404th..1u....[-404].[405]

405th..2u....[-406].[810]

594th..2u...[-784]..[810]

the rest=hit,
405x2u=810-..=..profit.

 Let say,
in an OVERSSIMPLIFIED hypothesis.

EC sleeps for 404spins, then if we bet falt, then at 404th spin, we have -404u losses,
then we need a streak of 405win, to win 1u,

1st   spin=lose..=-1u
to
404th spin=lose=-404u.[405win/remaining=596spins]

the problem , is there still 190losing spins to tackle!
Then how are we going to "progress"???


-----------------------------------------------------------
in whatever patterns they can appear.???
If we start betting from the 1st spin???

BlueAngel's marthy 1234...stepping up every 37cycle,

I wonder..., 

"could yours win, if only 405/100hits???"
in whatever patterns they can appear.???

BlueAngel? You read this?

Going by Albalaha's finding,
then,
in an oversimplified example,

if we see, say,
an EC sleep for 10spins,
then there will at least 405/990spins.

thus a 'worst' table below.

sleep for...

0 spin=405hits/1000spins.[40.5%]
10spins=405hits/990spins.[40.9%]
20spins=405hits/980spins.[41%]
30spins=405hits/970spins.[41.7%]

to...

190spins=405/810spins=breakeven?!

=====================

Gentlemen,
Albalaha's posting ,
have give me an idea.
[maybe you already knew it]

He says, after millions spins investigation,
the virtual limit for,

dozen=250hits/1000spins.
EC=405hits/1000spins.

Thus now we move away,

from,  trying to bet in tens of spins,
or a 100spins, which, after 300years of casinos open shop,
that none of any human being can figured out how to beat the wheel!

We try to  in 1000spins!
===================
dozen=250hits/1000spins.
EC=405hits/1000spins.

the trillion dollars question, is ,
how to have a progression, that can win 1u, with only,


405hits/1000spins.
for EC.???
[There may never less than 405hit, in 1000spins].

250hits/1000spins,
for dozen bet???
[There may never less than 250hit, in 1000spins].

column/dozen: 250 hits in 1000 spins

then, if you can,

250x2=+500u
losses=1000-250=-750.
losses=750-500.=-250

if you can figure out, how to recoup,
-250losses, by 250hits,


or win, with only 250hits/1000spins...
then you got a way to win...constantly.

Greenguy,
3700, is  assumed,
that all bet may around BREAKEVEN.

If you bet flat, u may win, or lose,
accordingly to your ladyluck.

Say, if we see, that a single number sleeps for 500spins, then you may bet that single, continuously, to 3700th spin.
and hopefully, as, or if it breakeven earlier, then you win, even before the 3700th spin.

Hi Albalaha,
you say,
------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Virtual limit of persistent bad doing bets, in my observations(in european roulette):

straight up:only 4 hits in 1000 spins
split: only 15 hits in 1000 spins
street: only 40 hits in 1000 spins
corner: 60 hits in 1000 spins
line bet: 110 hits in 1000 spins
column/dozen: 250 hits in 1000 spins
EC bet: 405 hits in 1000 spins
double dozens/columns: 575 hits in 1000 spins

unquote.
----------------------

Thus, if we could have a progression, that beat, say,
EC bet: 405 hits in 1000 spins,

win=+405u,
lose=595u,
losses=-190...

then we need to have a progression,
that recoup -190losses,
by 405hits.
=====================================
or win, at least 1u, with only 405hits/1000spins!!!

that's a grail!!!

Hi Albalaha,
in your blog, you say...
===========================
Every bet selection reaches at its break even point minus house edge in long run


I do have my own set of trackers and bots. I have extensively tested all bet selections over millions of spins. In long run, say in 3700 spins (100 cycles of all numbers) or more, every bet selection gets to its break even point minus house edge. This applies very accurately to outside bets.
               This fact ensures profit for casinos unless a player get lucky streaks and he could capitalize that too.

RG,'
and gentlemen,
I tell you an stale open secret.
If you cut the wheel into three almost equal portion,
whether you bet one portion, or double,
after long spins, you will notice, in long spins, they'll always almost equal,

BUT, they tend to CLUSTERED,
AND NOW YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO!

Say,
An OVERSIMPLIFIED EXAMPLE.


You bet marthy for 10losses,
[helooo..this just an OVERSIMPLIFIED EXAMPLE, OK?]

You wait, and wait, and wait,
for 10streak of losses to happen.

Then VIOLA!! It happen!!!

10 streaks of red,
then wait for a black to hit,

and the you bet that TEN RED won't HIT AGAIN.


Hope you understand.

The roulette is casino's HG,
the only way to win,
is to avoid LOSSES,

or losses to happened,
that the losses avoided!

POSSIBLE losses that depleted your profit.

What you gentlemen think???

Bet from different angle.

Ok,
You have a wonderful system,

and you see that ,

say in every 10season,
YOU ARE very CONFIDENT,

your system will lose , say 3times,


Darn!, that THREE session,
will cause,
the other 7season winning,
DEPLETED to NEGATIVE!

Thus how you ensure profit long term???

EASY,

don't play with real money,
play your seasons, on paper,

then only play real when a losing,
or two losing season losses, on paper, happened!

say, 2winning, and 2losing seasons.

AND YOU BET THE REST OF THE SEASON WITH CONFIDENT.

of course, YOU MUST, very CONFIDENT,
THAT YOUR SYSTEM, ALWAYS 'averagely',
LOSE 3, OUT OF 10SEASONS.



What you , gentlemen, THINK???

wait for the losses to happen, then bet the rest, will save chips.

the 12 street hit in next 12spins,
will highly impossible,

and if 8hit/12, is the accepetable averages max,

then wait for 8/12,
and bet it will not 8/12 again.

may better risk/reweard.
What you think.
====================
Wade,
6/6 of DoubleStreet, will hit,
then wait 6/6, then bet,
for it won't happen, will better.

Instead of waiting for 18nos, why not wait for 24,
and bet the 24nos???
Since the law of third, says, always 24???
isn't this better?
Anyone???