Wishing you well, gr8player

TwinRiverdlr.

If you see someone winning at your casino,  I would play as they play.
If you want stats on methods go to Imspirit baccarat.  Please check it out because I get
20 bucks per visit, just joking, it will be a start on method results.
it's a large site with many links.

Trip report.
I flat bet four shoes.
The short of it. I won 3 units early in the first shoe,
I continued to play being I flat bet only $15.
by the end of fourth shoe I lost 4 units.
I didn't bet every hand. usually 6 bets per shoe.
Will see if I can recover and gain 3 units next trip. 

Soxfan, Do you favor a 30% to 50% positive progression so that you increase your bet amount about 30% - 50%,  similar to  ...  3u, 4u, 5u, 7u

When do you take your profits ? 

Yes I do believe this is possible.
If anything can be done to insure the house percentage it will be done, this is a fact.
In most states and countries so called Gaming Commissions are there for the casino management not the players.

Jimske

Did you find . www. hulu blackjack cheaters

While reading an older ImSpirit  I read that if a flat bet loses, a progression will only lose more.
I assume the opposite will be true as well. 

I will let ya know on my next trip late this week. I will flat bet $25 maybe $50 and try for three or more. This will buy few gallons of jet fuel.

Thanks Tomla,
   I don't have an answer to the question.

To win three units with a 100 unit bank, a player should only bet the same amount without a progression.
I will need to get back to you on this,  being I play only three times a month.  It may take some time.

Has anyone toyed with the idea of changing the texture of the shoe ?
So that the result may be more 2's or less long runs for example?

I gotta add my two cents,  Someone once said," If it sounds to good to be true..."

If is was as simple as betting One unit then Two units, we would all be rich and Baccarat tables would close.

There is a reason why this game is in a casino, and that is because most people lose.

If anyone had a winning method, It surely would not be public or for sale .   

Is there a case here? Probably not.  Even Ellis has said something to the order of , ... you have to pick the right shoes and you have to win the majority of your bets...   sounds like winning advice.

I'm sorry to all who have purchased a club membership or method and received lass than they expected.

Although this thread is about Ellis playing 2HI. 

I do like Grt8's slow progression, although I've never tried it,  when he hits a trend his losses can be recovered.

Grt8,  do you use any other progression ? 

As a follow up note, I will add that the normal shoe distribution bias results mentioned above,  is as if,   a person bet every hand on every shoe.
Nothing new here.
Get in , Get out  is good advice.
Tracking a bias is simple and good advice to find a favorable bet.  IMO This is what Ellis promotes with his NOR, etc. tracking methods.
That's what it's all about.  Find a chopping shoe,  if you like to bet the chop, with a 1, 2  progression etc.
I've played shoes that never went over 3 iar.
I've played shoes with multiple runs.
And, of course, there are the mixed shoes.
I guess the trick is to match the method with the shoe, stop if you are losing, wait for another shoe with your favorite bias.

Greetings,

Progressions such as 112 will be victim of the shoe distribution bias. This is why some say Ellis's this or that system doesn't work.
Progressions such as 12, 112, 123, 1234, 1248, 124124, 121248  on any combination of PB falls victim to the same distribution bias.