I have finish and got  to target. Once it was close, down 800 units, otherwise all went smooth.




1513 spuns and  1002 units won.  It was on a zero wheel.

Quote from: Chrisbis on March 12, 2013, 07:11:00 PM
What's your progression Ralph?


I have done some work in the past on playing 3 EC's 

Pls read my first post!

Quote from: Sputnik on March 12, 2013, 07:38:56 PM

How come you don't aim for a low win target ? you have a better chance to succed that way ! don't you agree ?

We can aim for less! But if we play it again and aim for less, and once again.....
It is no difference if you try to win 1000 in one go or several   timeframes. We never now when the bad runs come.


There is a good chance to make it. If I take 100 units in 10 trials or1000  in one is just a kind of bookkeeping, which will
only help if you think a pause helps(HAR).


I reset  most of the time after winning one or two units.

1137 spins. Plus  653.

975 spins and plus 553. Some drowndrawn and some parlays hitted on all.

I am now up to 808 spins and the plus is  371.

Quote from: Sputnik on March 12, 2013, 02:21:57 PM

Fun mode is not the real thing, you might use RX or random org ...
As i see it your results are bias, my opinion ...

I hardly use simulations, and I use funmode just sometimes.  Bv real you can test with small bets.  Rx and similar things I have no use for.
I do not understand your meaning of bias!

I have tested different types of EC bets, and I use to have some problems getting mote than a few plus. This time I will use all three EC:s and parlay once on winning bets. I will let the losing bet stay. Reset at any plus. I did some 1000 tests in fun and it was about half a chip plus pro spin.  I change now to Zero Wheel even if I would have better result at NOZ. it is in real mode and the lowest bet. The risk money is 10 Euro, and the target is to double the money. I will this time bet against the last number.


I have done 582 spins and got 258 plus.

Quote from: Razor on March 12, 2013, 01:20:47 PM

I agree

It may go for long, but the 2.7% or 1.3% will show up.  On BV NOZ it may be possible, if you bet red for zillions of time it can be more reds at
any number of bets.  I have tried a lot winning flat, it is at the end a smaller loss. On some inside bets like one single, it happens sometimes
I can stay  a head 1000 of spins, but at the end it swings down, and two chips will be bet. 

I had before compressed the bot with Jzip, and it may be problem for some.  I have uploaded a zip using WinZip.



http://roullettebot.com/bot/BvBot.zip

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 12, 2013, 07:10:08 AM

The smaller the edge the larger the chip size required to make your efforts financially rewarding, and therefore the more attention you will receive from the casino.

The larger the edge the smaller the chip size required to make your efforts financially rewarding, and therefore the lesser attention you will receive from the casino.

Big chips don't necessarily equate to professional play or millions in profit.

Anyone with millions as their goal needs to balance earnings with invisibility. Whatever your method, to be truly confident in the career sense, you must remain virtually undetected for decades.

It is harder in USA, two zeros and banning if you win. It is not so in Europe. I have seen computers in casinos openly. The casinos trust they will make profit, and takes a HE from 1.3 on EC. You are allowed to win as long the play is fair.

I use the latest version, and it works.  I will load up it on the server again, in case that is damaged.


Te reason I thought it can not be the program, is it  was working Friday, not on Saturday and Sunday, but on Monday it was working, the same version, the same copy, the same computer.


Windoes had updates and the casino did service Monday, I do not know that's cause the problem, it can not be the program. I have not heard from others about it either.

Quote from: AMK on March 03, 2013, 10:16:37 PM
.


If we know that we are consistently incorrect 30 or 40% of the time a certain bet might give us an advantage : )

To know we are consistently incorrect would be nice, such a "bad" method will win if we reverse it.


Even 30%-40% incorrect is winning.

Quote from: spike on March 12, 2013, 07:23:31 AM
Old time gambler saying:

"First you have to win, then you have to get the casino
to pay you."

Good luck with that and your winning millions plan..

I do not have such a plan, and I do not bet flat. Without a plan to win a million I have done it once. (the currency  6.6 to an USD).
It is remote chance to repeat again.

Everybody claim he/she can, can easy proof it with the Bentley or similar.  After a while it is maxbet which is the only sensible bet.


Some can win flat for long, but probably not forever.


The betselection have to come over the house which is from 0 to 5.25% depending on table. The variance must always beaten.


If it is done with so small edge as  0.5 -  2% the player will rather soon make millions.