Sputnik,
since single=50%,
series2=25%
series3+ =25%.
Thus we bet SINGLE HAS MORE CHANCE IN 3SEQUENCE.

Here is Sputnik's,
random org file where 1 stands for Player and 2 stands for Banker.

2
2
1
1
1
2
WIN


1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
WIN

2
1
1
1
1
2
WIN

1
1
1
2
1
WIN

2


1
1
2
WIN
1


2
2
2
2
1
1LOSE

2


1
2WIN

1
2
2


1
1
1
1
1
1
1LOSE

2
2
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
2


1WIN

2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2LOSE

1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1LOSE


2
1
2
2LOSE

1


2
2
2
1
1
1LOSE

2
1
2WIN

1
2
1WIN


2
2
1
2
2
2
2LOSE


1
2
1
1
1LOSE


2
2
1
2
2LOSE

1
1
2
1WIN

2
1
1


2
2
2LOSE

1
2
1W

2
1
2W


1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1L


2
1
2
2L


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1L


2
1
2W

1
2
2
1W


2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2L

1
2
1
1
1
1L

2
1
1
1
2W

1
2


1
1L

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1


2W

1
2
2
1
1L

2
2
2
1
2
2L


1
2
2
2
1
1L


2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2L

1
2
1W

2
1
2W

1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1L

2


1
1
2W

1


2
2
2
1
1L

2
2
1
1
1
2
2L


1
2
2
1W

2
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2L

1
2


1
1L

2
2
2
1
1


2W

1
2
1W

2
2


1
1
1
2W

1
1

Sir,
I could not disagree anymore...
you are absolutely right.
(You already posses a hg.)

I rest my case and forever grateful to you.
You are second to none in gambling knowledge!

by the way...what the worst ever known dz/100?
Thanks.

Sir,
how about single dozen.
What the worst dz in 100spins.
Thanks

since both are less than 33.34% hit...

.then labby can't close. and the staking will snowballing to unbearable high.

with possibility of hit lower than 33.34...
no wonder
labby being labeled as a failure.

Thank u Sputnik for your unique interesting ideas.
Appreciate them.
need more time to understand your way.
please tell more as it is interesting.
and how about your progression?
thanks.

and as espoused by you in your blogs...we could only win in long rtm-ed spin or hand.  you hint 1000 or even 3700 better risk to take.
thus with johnny...we could prolong the labby..after flater....whereas the basic labby itself will snowballing to horrible...even before the 200spin.
with johnny we could manipulate.

Sir,
Math wise..
the labby..or any added zero in front of 1...that prolong snowballing....will definitely win before or on the 200th EC spin...or hand.

if it definitely win in every season..of 200..
then what and why YOU...AND I... still posting here?

its because the br gone horrible...and the deadly marthy.

the hpjohnny is just another version of labby  that also face same debacle...The johnny can prolong the flatbet and prolong the labbying process..
we need to manipulate the progression to avoid horibble br and the deadly marthy....to win 1u...before the very last win hit...

think hard...

if...you want to bet 1000spins with
hpjohnson..then you could bet that
EC will NEVER HIT LESS THAN 345HITS.

WHY 345 the extreme virtual limit?
simply because worst ever recorded  is still
69/200...thus 1000 will never see 69x5=345.

bet with 690 fixed string of johnny.
that 689zeros  with a 1.

a win strike out two digit...
the left and rightmost..
thus flatbet will never than 690time.
and labby will not more than 345time.
but marthy still will kick in...sigh..

as you said..Labby is mathematical..
then (i know you already heard this stales.. a thousand time...i can imagine you roll up your eyes )...

200EC has at least 69hits..
thus more than the 33.34%.
it will certainly close...
you can also bet with  johnny...137zero plus 1.
as it close with 69hits.

but... the pertinent question...the snowball br and table limit....solved  this...eureka!

the labby is flexible yet daunting...


if you bet 1000spins with hpjohnny...you can't possibly lose....
if 1000 too short...then.

in your own blog you says 3700spins..where almost every ec dz may rtm...thus bet with hpjohnny with 1800 will not suicidal...
there's a nick of realization...its
your own ideas BUT...that you yet realize.
you almost get the ideas but you just not see it...when you eventually realize it...you will jump up eureka...and not post anything here forever...as..you have a grail..
people knows about it just zipped up...

Thank you sir for your thought.
If we bet hp johnny for very short spins...say..20 or even 30spins...it be very painful..suicidal..BUT..
if you simulate very long....say..1000spins...you see that it will almost a grail...the labby@johnson...is a martingale  instead of a single hit..is a modified marthy..that...win with predetermined hit...
1000 spins can't possibly less than40%hit...check you zumma...see how low the worst EC per 1000...
I am eager to know...
ps.i can't believe you can't understand how 5d/23s=40+%...?

labby needs 33.34hitrate to win...
but hp.johnson more flexible...wherr you could determine
how many hit to close...and even prolong the bets by creating more strings to endure variance.

two simple way to start Johnny.
1. fixed string where you crossout ONE digit..the leftmost digit or string.
say...you want to win 1u...in 500hits.
then 499zero+1....
crossout the left after a hit...and when lose...write a 1 at the right side of previous 1...
when all zero replaced with 1...add the leftmost and rightmost...that's bet 2u.
if win...crossout only the left...if lose add 1 to the leftmost and  a 1 to second leftmost...then bet 1+2=
bet 3u...

Another johnny is ...to win1 in 500hit
=999zero plus a 1...
bet like labby..but in fixed 1000string...and crossout TWO...when win....the right and left...

as always...evry erudite member here knows that labby always snowballing the br...and marthy takesover at the very last needed hit.

then we need a modified hp.johnny to tackle these...

even if you can't have "a little edge". as espoused by the mathboys...then if your betselection always not far from  -3%...not a problem with labby.

member like..NICKMSI...who always quest for a little edge...after long spins ...
could trying to bet with labby since FLATBET always frustrating...