"Denzie???
Where art thou? >> He's currently making a chart from testing a 386 step for a Marty on the columns. If it works on paper......

You forgot 3 numbers and I don't use that G word. Only rookies use those terms.

Ken

I don't care who you are, a nobody in my world.

Ken

I think it went over your head, no biggie.

Ken

"Therefore is impractical for someone to wait so long before bets" >> ?? SAY WHAT??

I thought with "you guys", if it works on paper, it COUNTS as a winner?

(Laying out 163 dollar chips in a couple seconds for example).
Hey, if it works on paper, it's a winner! (lmao)

Ken

I LOVE IT !!!! can't wait for tonight, one of my favorite times of the year. The Oscars and Lincoln's birthday!! Anyone else gonna watch?

Ken

Quote from: greenguy on February 26, 2016, 11:29:16 AM
I agree with keeping accurate records for all your real play.

I don't believe I could wait 12-18 months to check though. I prefer to reconcile the ledger after every casino visit.

Good bookkeeping can be a blessing.

More of my point is this >> your overall net winnings (percent) better continue to climb. How? Through trial & error, correcting ok methods and making them better.....you should be a *SMARTER* player year after year. Learning what does not work.

Ken

    "Don't worry about those who talk behind your back, they're behind for a reason."

This is a strong opinion I have. Around every 12-18 months, you should look over your RECORDS regarding roulette play, ACTUAL CASINO play that is. What do your NET winnings look like OR your losses?

The overall +/-

I keep all my records in notebooks. If year after year, your profits (if there are any) keep falling or just holding steady, perhaps roulette is not for you. I see NO REASON to play year after year and stay in limbo, what's the point? Real success, every 12-18 months, your NET profits (percent) should be steadily going up. I do understand, some people play three times a week and some play six times a year, I get it.

Ken

These last 3 I'll keep up. If you had half a brain, you would know why.

Ken

Regarding that 4 number method, I can't stop laughing. Me and a few other members have been chatting about it via email, never PM. I deleted it, yes but PURPOSELY kept it up elsewhere. Why?


I changed the "rules" then kept it up, as if I forgot to delete. Then, a couple of the GOOFS copy/paste (lol) stating, we better copy this before mr j notices it (rofl) !!
Hook, line & sinker, all too easy.

Ken

 Without a decent bet selection and the proper roulette experience, you don't have success, you have a hobby.

Beat-the-Meat wrote:

Mr J, stop feeding your huge EGO, ...
Denzie has posted more, and better ideas than u.
The Law, has posted better too.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Those two goofs wouldn't know a decent method if it sat on their face. They will always be long term losers....RNG, bots, air ball, progressions, betting 24 numbers, triggers, "wait until", it goes on and on folks.

All signs of rookie play, sorry Charlie.

Ken

Quote from: ADulay on February 24, 2016, 11:13:21 PM
Yep.  It drives me nuts.

I really wish we didn't have that ability here.

AD

I really don't like it, honestly I don't. However, if it is available........

It can't be a timing issue of when to bet. Your HE is still the same(?) Give me an example of "timing", the HE is now lower than 5.26% (2.7%). This is the problem I have, I feel there are GREAT numbers to bet and at GREAT times to make those bets *BUT* according to the math, it makes no difference.

Another example >> you wait until one street has yet to hit, then start long progression on it. I can sit here and say, don't bet on sleepers, there is nothing special about the 13 14 15 etc., then I have my awesome method (3 numbers) .......according to the math, my 3 numbers are no better/worse than the guy chasing that street? (lol) Its mind boggling.

Ken