Ok so everyone's opinion is to follow the trend.
Thank you.

Oh yes!
Sorry! I forgot about that

In my opinion the problem with the deviations is that we never know if the current deviation it s a fixing deviation of a previous deviation! 
So we still play without any advantage on our bet selection my friends.

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 03, 2013, 01:20:52 PM

Can it be that people can't get past the bet selection stage? Maybe that alone is a brick wall.

Thanks for the reply.
But if I understood your concept correctly, you are also making bet selections.
Not by sleeping bets selections,not by repeating bets selections ,but with both of them whenever you feel like.(according to your data)
So correct me if I am wrong but you are also making bet selections.

I would like to add that with your method if things go like trend continue-trend stop-trend continue-trend stop

And this is because with every bet selection or trend or whatever there is a flow that WILL make us lose soon or later.

If i have misunderstood something in your method then you can elaborate more if you like.

 FIRST EXAMPLE
Lets say we have 3 wheels in front of us that each of them has spun 5 REDS in a row.

SECOND EXAMPLE
Lets say we have one other wheel that has  also spun 5 REDS in a row.

From your expirience what is more likely to happen?


In the first example the majority of the wheels( 2 of 3 or all 3 wheels) to spun a BLACK?

Or in the second example the one wheel with the 5 REDS to spin a BLACK?

If you think that there is a difference,then this would be the start of a great system.

I think that you are contradicting yourself.And I am saying this to you with good intention. . I mean no war my friend.
In my point of view if roulette is beatable ,the way is to increase the accuracy of the predictions and play FLAT bet ONLY.

Quote from: Albalaha on February 28, 2013, 02:35:09 AM
Everyone (mostly) is writing a "System" without having any "concept" or "logic" in it. That is why all are leading towards one end:  loss.

+1

Quote from: Sputnik on March 02, 2013, 11:44:45 AM
It was just for fun, no need to test it for any larger sample, as all bet selection lose in the long run.
That i old thinking, you can not beat the game based upon larger sample when testing bet selections.

Then the question is :
WHY are you testing bet selections if you already know that all bet selection lose in the long run.

Nice for you.
But 300 trials is a very small sample.

We can use a method in 1000 trials and be very +.
And then in an other trial of only 200 spins we can be very -.