Thanks! If you want to reply to something I've written, go ahead.
If not, no worries obviously.
Anyway I'll be waiting for your next post.

hi asym, I write better things then just " share a strategy .. "

Quote from: KungFuBac on October 27, 2025, 04:45:36 PMGood post Whatswhat.

Thanks really!

Meanwhile for asym, it's rare but i see personally that happen very often, almost with the SYM that I decide to bet against that are what I wrote before with X/O

So for you the best ASYM/SYM what is?

Meaning the ASYM I explain are the quality and quantity ASYM in my opinion but you are ahead of me obviously so i never talk on forum etc.. but its the moment.

Because at the end get a SSS and every S is a 4 hand group, is pratically bet against that a 3 prefixed pattern of 4 hand will appear continuesly, can be this another fallacy?

Or anyway mathematically if we before play decide to do this the stats say what you and I say before so there is an advantage?

I say this because you and kunk/alex give a lot of good info here.

Really and I personally take every info and then make it in mine way, I literally study every post of this entire topic,

Why didn't explain a single strategy from a to z?

I ask this because with a we'll explain strategy we can then go further with other concept or improve it.

Obviously you explain well how to bet with A/S , when is better to bet example after a single AA one time or after SS it's the best option.

But is possible to have an entire plan or multiple plan?

Obviously I didn't ask private things just a better summary or what you already decide to share, like I said i study very post but obviously a summary from the owner will be a gold value for then in my case applicate my other concept or idea.

Ps.

Another strategy that I'm testing is your A/S

With column of shoes, obviously we know that  single are 50% of the result then double 25%
and so on.. obviously this didn't mean nothing it's just a stats but betting only in this position can be an idea already developed also by other

So we use 4 column to say if is X/O so I personally use X/O and not anymore B/P etc

X/O is based now on single or double/ or more

This with a not precisely random walk , so on example online baccarat we have multiple table that we can observe so we can choice example the table with SS or our trigger without waiting too long.

But this always with / what we mean for ASYM or sym?

So in a world of X/O and XXXX XXXO etc always with a X of start, what do you think that is the "pattern" symmetrical that we need to bet against?

The WWWWLLLLL in my case if we use the 4 result for group. It's asym

Pratically

XXXX
XXXO
XXOX
XXOO SYM
XOOO
XOOX
XOXO SYM
XOXX

All the other are Asym,

Then obviously we can decide to give the Asym meaning to the 4 result production that mathematically are ""more rare"" to happen then the other.

My example is this that the X number of player bet every hand virtually and example after a SS / they bet for an A. One time if a player get SSS it will delete for that shoe.

The probability that multiple player together will get SSS and not SSA is lower?

Can also be a fallacy obviously, but I like your concept and style and i just try to make it "" in my version ""

But probably I'm telling not good things?

Anyway thanks again for all the info and waiting for news your post go further on this your method.

If you can explain example an entire or multiple plan to have a summary of this ASYM/SYM concept.

Obviously if you can't / don't want it's okay!

And another things, is that I personally don't use anymore B/P or W/L etc or explaining better I use them but in another way, I transform this in X/O with every first result is always X , so if I have the A/S strategy, using a group of 4

I will have
example BBPBPBBB

it will be
XXOX BBPB ASYM..
XOOO PBBB ASYM..

And so on.
probably then it didn't change any stats etc.. but it's a way that i use to play faster thinking less because i need to play like a robot following the rules and this help me..

Anyway waiting for you to answer to what i say also before this post.

Have a good weekend asymbacguy

Thanks for your kind words!

If I can go a little further — imagine 10 or more player that bet EVERY HAND virtually, who uses a strategy where each hand can be chopped etc or bet in any way,(every player have different betting strategies) even randomly.

For every player, we keep a win/loss record, and we automatically track the results (A or S) of the previous four hands.

I've already built this system. Right now, I'm testing a strategy where I place a bet after an "A" following "SS," but I only include players for whom "SSS" never occurs — if it does, that player is excluded from the calculation.

(Obviously happen that multiple player have a possibility to bet so i choose what the majority say)

I also test variations like bet "A after a single A" or "A after AA."

Don't worry if it takes time to reply — I check this forum daily to read your posts and develop my own ideas based on your insights, which I truly admire.

If you have any ideas on how to improve the testing process, or theoretical approaches to betting based on these immediate statistics (generated through spreadsheet formulas), I'd really appreciate your thoughts.

Hi asym, I read your post from years and years from this and other forums.

I want to ask you if possible a thinks about the asym/sym concept of S/A etc..

It's work also on not pure result of B/P but also on W/L ?

Meaning if we simulate a spreadsheet with 10 or more players that bet every hand and get W/L so like a B/P

Can we get an edge or a better way to bet?

Having multiple player that give us in the same shoes multiple S/A stats?

hi mate can you share the excel file? so I can test also by myself ?