BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Winning in the long run is most important
« Last post by Albalaha on Yesterday at 08:30:30 am »
Wong,
         Labby is good to be played on paper only. My ratio of 90 wins: 10 losses will not work as +50/-100 in labby. One single failure in labby can cost you even 100s of wins. I hope you understand this and do not ask what labby can do or not again. If you are happy with theoretical aspects, I said numerous times that labby, marty, fibo will beat any session at last but once you fail on them due to table limit or your bankroll, you will wet your pants and will never try them ever in your life Please try to understand that the power of marty or laby or fibo lies in their big bets compensating many of the losses at once but not doable practically, in any form possible. You have asked about labby and HP johnson so many times and I m tired of answering them. Better forget them or play them on paper only.
2
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Winning in the long run is most important
« Last post by PatternAnalys on Yesterday at 08:05:44 am »
Gentlemen,
There no law stipulates, that in labby,
one must start from a single digit,
or must closed the long string og million digits string...
If you start a labby with a single digit,
say,
"1",
then 33.34%hit ,no matter how many bets,...needed to closed the labby.

If we start with two digit,
say,
(0)(1), then 33.34% +1more hit .
needed to closed.

say, three,
0,0,1.
then 33.34+ 2more hit,
and so on.
Thus in 2000bets, 900 hit almost certain...
2000x33.4~=667..-900=233long string
3
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Winning in the long run is most important
« Last post by PatternAnalys on Yesterday at 07:49:36 am »
Sir,
thus 20000/100bet =200 sessions.
10700losses/200=53.5 losses average.
10 sessions probably negative/positive extreme variance.
 
But as you say, 900, hit, /2000
almost certain, then
 "1100 of one "
labby, should be the winning when the 900th win hit...with 1100unit profit, not one unit....
and not try to win 1100, but few tens unit will not superfluous...
4
       95% is within expectation winning sessions while 5% will be extremes that rush us to stop loss or close. With +50/-100 or +25/-50, if we get even 80% wins and 20% loser sessions,
Sir,
95/5 w/l ratio..
Now, we could  grasp that 5%that caused us to lose our underwear!!!

And of course you won't give away your mm!? that +100-50.
But at least give a simple hint, since my brain power not good as yours!
It will save many sleepless night and headache and heartache
5
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Winning in the long run is most important
« Last post by Albalaha on Yesterday at 07:25:19 am »
Quote
I think, of in20000 trials,
9300 is certain, .
Thus 10700 losses will closed by 9300hit 9300 certain hit will close the

thus 10700 long of "one" labby will closed before 9300th win hit.

Labby, marty and fibonacci are not feasible ways to play. I wasted years fine tuning them but while failing they give us such huge losses that suck all the wins, so far. They are mathematically winner but practically not. HP Johnson is the worst form of labby. Accepting losses in extremes are always wiser than dragging them. Mark my word today.
6
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: I can beat these extreme sessions of EC. Can you?
« Last post by Albalaha on Yesterday at 07:19:28 am »
Sir,
You advocate that, 'extreme variance management', and "a special mm", the real way to beat casino.
I eager to know, by your experience with data, say, bet "player" only,what the ratio, of "within expectations vs extreme"?
If the ratios dependable, then we can fearlessly bet with "expected losses vs expected profit"...

       95% is within expectation winning sessions while 5% will be extremes that rush us to stop loss or close. With +50/-100 or +25/-50, if we get even 80% wins and 20% loser sessions, we will still be up, in the long run. That is what is my plan exactly. Earlier I was focused on getting +1.
7
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Winning in the long run is most important
« Last post by PatternAnalys on Yesterday at 07:19:05 am »
It is pretty painful to never see any debate over how an MM for long run could be created. We all know that variance could be horrible only temporarily. If we see 20 trials, getting minimum 9 wins persistently is a trouble, while in 200 trials minimum 90 wins are more likely, if we take 2000 trials, getting minimum 900 wins are almost certain. If we see 20,000 trials, anything below 9300 wins is almost impossible.
          Why can't we do something to get a good net income that is assured after even 20k trials? Isn't it better than losing always, at last?
Isn't casino also striving for only 1% profit of all our bets placed?
          Anybody who has seen, experienced, read or tried anything that can work in long run? Let me know.


I think, of in20000 trials,
9300 is certain, .
Thus 10700 losses will closed by 9300hit 9300 certain hit will close the

thus 10700 long of "one" labby will closed before 9300th win hit.
8
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: +50 OR -100?
« Last post by Albalaha on Yesterday at 07:15:34 am »
+25 or -50 will change the win loss ratio slightly but will be practically doable easier too.
9
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Millionaire's plan: My dream project
« Last post by Albalaha on Yesterday at 07:06:20 am »
Sir,
If your mm can +50, and -100,
then, there no law say you can't bet both side.
Say, have two person ,
bet with your mm,
if next 100bet produce within math, then both will win +50.
if extreme hit, then
1 person will -100, and the other +50, the end only lose -50.
what you think?

         Betting both sides have no advantage. First, it will be difficult to compute together and bet in a real casino. Secondly, it will appear weird and will draw the attention of the casino. Since extreme will hit rarely(only in 5% cases, my way) it is not intriguing. I agree that while I will lose -100, I should win +50 easily too but not necessarily. I will evaluate those cases playing both sides to answer you.
10
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Millionaire's plan: My dream project
« Last post by PatternAnalys on Yesterday at 06:44:37 am »
Sir,
If your mm can +50, and -100,
then, there no law say you can't bet both side.
Say, have two person ,
bet with your mm,
if next 100bet produce within math, then both will win +50.
if extreme hit, then
1 person will -100, and the other +50, the end only lose -50.
what you think?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10