Why bac could be beatable itlr

[AsymBacGuy]

This finding (there are quite more of them) emphasizes the importance of studying shoes coming out from the same source and that around the globe there are very acute players trying to get a kind of an edge whatever intended as the person we've met during our sessions.

It's way more interesting to assess that this finding promotes an unsound math plan as all bets are placed at P side.

Shoes are coming out from the same shuffling machine brand, even if working at different casinos (!).

That's not the only finding promoting a kind of univocal betting placement, just one of the easiest.

Unfortunately (and probably this is a possible added value of it) a nearly half of the shoes dealt are unplayable at least for this specific attack. Then only one bet is suggested per every playable shoe.
Needless to say and since it's an unsound math strategy, it cannot work at other shoe productions.

More later.

as. 

[Whatswhats]

Next week we'll see how to exploit at a maximum level the AS/S patterns feature.

as.

Waiting for this, so interesting read and then elaborate that mixed with mine idea.

[AsymBacGuy]

Thanks whatswhats.
 
The plan is conceived to deny a simultaneously symmetrical situation happening at both the Big Road and the Big Eye Boy road right at the very first pattern coming out at each road or to get a A-A pattern at both lines.

For example say the first sequence is BBBBPBPPBBB (first pattern is A). The BR is A but the ByB road is S (brbbrb).
That's a loss.

The next shoe formed a BPPPBBBBP initial succession getting an A pattern at BR and an A pattern at ByB road. That's a win.

Next shoe went as BBBBBBBPPPBPP, so a S pattern showing up at BR but a A pattern coming out at ByB road (rrbbbbbb), that's a win.

Next shoe went as PBPBPBBBBBB, Byb is rrrrbrrrr, thus an A-A simultaneous A pattern at both lines. It's a win.

Then the next shoe: BPPPPPPPPBBBBBPBPB, ByB is brrrrrrbrrrr. Another A-A pattern situation. Another win.

Then a PPBPBBPBB shoe, ByB is brbbbbbbb, that is an A pattern happening at BR and an S event happening at ByB, it's a loss.

Then a PBPBPPPBPP shoe, ByB is rrrbrbbb, so a A-A pattern showing up at both sides. Again a win.

This shoe went as BPBBPBBBB..., ByB is rbbbbrr that is a S pattern (BR) followed by an A pattern at ByB. It's a win.

To cut a long story short, A or S first events happening at BR and ByB are obviously more likely to produce the same result (A) or to get an S followed by an A at the other road (most likely at ByB as this one starts its action after some hands are dealt at BR).
Such propensity is so worthwhile that whenever the first hand negating a S pattern should be placed at P side, the possible edge becomes more interesting.

Naturally S-S first BR and ByB patterns happen (or, more likely, A-S patterns) but they are strongly restricted in their appearance.
In fact to get a S-S pattern happening at both lines we need an exact proportional number of BP hands dealt coming out at a portion of the shoe (initial part) springing out from a total random source (the cut and the first card rank dictating how many cards are to be discarded from the play).

Actually the professional guy didn't take care about asymmetry or symmetry, just betting that parallel sub-sequences applied to the same BP succession won't get the same quality results at two or more lines.
Smart guy.

as.

[Whatswhats]

You didn't explain in that post what was for you ASYM/SYM pattern

But then everyone can have their ASYM/sum pattern so it's okay, mine are a tweaked version of what you explain some times ago, (tweaked for me then didn't know if it's better or not)

I created a spreadsheet where I can track simultaneously the 4 road with all the result of mine pattern ASYM/sum situation etc..

What you say is creating a random strategy with a random walk so random+random

So didn't take the result from a single road but mix multiple road together that theorically and pratically when we bet the result are always 2 so maths say that, and isn't important what happen before etc but in this case we are creating a game in the game so in pratically mix that multiple road with a random walk and the asym/sym concept with max 2 bet per trigger (I personally use multiple virtual player trigger so can happen that I can bet just one time per trigger) mix this with multiple road, is effectively give us a lower volatility?

Because at the end for me but I think for who make this as a real business the goal is always get lower volatility, every concept every strategy every ideas on this job for baccarat / even chance is always to get low volatility.