+ Register

[alrelax]

One of the things that I do look for, is "just one more" events. 

My reasoning is, because change happens and will happen no matter what it is, what is happening or what the gambler desires.  And when it does, I sure have made a lot of great larger positive progression wagers on 1-2 and 3 of the next hands. 

True, that it might go a different direction, but a person needs to understand what the shoe might produce, more so than what he desires. 

The shoe loves to do two things and usually section those out.  Sectioning out means, exclusive to a certain section only, exclusive of other sections, and I favor 3-5 sections a shoe.  1). Out of the norm.  Break and deviate.  In other words, Against the current.  2). Continue with the more likely flow but against what has been produced by one or two more. 

My combat?  Working my buy-in a bit and of course, getting into my casino risk capital with a bit of fear.  But when wins come, dividing the profits into new un-feared risk capital while putting aside my buy-in so I am whole. 

No, you don't know what is or what is not going to come out.  Those on forums that claim to always know and all the system sellers are full of bull stuff totally!  However, if your not on it when it comes out, you can't win. 

I will post some pictures of just one more here.  Please understand that just one more, does not have to be a continuation of P/B iar.  It can very well be chop-chop or doubles, etc.  But for sake of explanation and simplicity, I will post pictures first of iar P/B. 

I will comment on the boards tomorrow.  But the 2nd picture also has a beautiful 8iar chop chop vs. the previous 2iar chop chop.  Large wagering on the 3rd one on until it falls off to a double. 


            👇EXAMPLES BELOW👇

[AsymBacGuy]

Yep, that's an intersting situation we are all forced to face (except for those geniuses who can't lose no matter what... )

as.

[alrelax]

The below quote is one of mine:

"The key is, like a lot wagering in bac--do not define events that have to happen and wager on them to happen in order to win, wager on what is happening and/or for the opportunities that are presenting themselves or possibly will if there are indications as to that is what might occur."

Picture 1). In the beginning.  'Just One More' I lean towards.  Like whatever is stronger in the beginning, especially when P comes out like sheer gangbusters.  So, bet P, follow it and lose 1.  Again after the short lived B, bet P and simply follow, maybe pos progression heavy and then just pull down the winning hands each time.  Again, lost the last.  Reset.

Hand 24 Banker.  Hand 24 begins 'Just One More'.  Wins hands 25 & 26.  Hand 41 begins 'Just One More' once again.    Personally I would have been (and was) heavy with a few full progressions, from hand 38, follow and pull down all the winning hands and only sacrifice my wager when it falls off to the P.  Same thing with B-iar to complete the box after the 3rd B and straight down.

Picture 2). Has a beautiful 8iar chop chop vs. the previous 2iar chop chop.  Large wagering on the 3rd one on, until it falls off to a double.

Picture 3). Money making 9 Chop Chop.  After the 3rd, be on the 4th until it falls off to an iar.  27th hand a banker heavy for 3,  stay and lose the 4th.  So example 29-30-31 wins and 32 loses.  Doubles, win 2 lose 2.  Start double betting at hand 50 until over.

Picture 4). Hand 20.  Win 20-22-23-24-25-26 and lose 27. 

Picture 5).  Player 9iar with the 3 ties.  After the 3rd player, start betting on the 4th.  Heavy and full progressions for 2 or 3, then just stick and pull down each winning hand until it falls off. 

Picture 6). Section 3.  Bet after the 4th banker, full progressions.  5-6-7 remain the same IMO.  10 wins and 1 loss.  Players wager after the great bankers streak.  Wager until it falls off.  Lose the 2 bankers come back wins or stop after the first banker and reset after the players start again right after that ties hand.  Wager on players until it falls off, but in this case it did not.

[KungFuBac]

Thanks for pics(&taking the time to post your real time Play-by-Play/thoughts).

*The last pic(Bottom R) Section 3 certainly had a little clustering(Gold mining opportunity).


Continued Success,

[alrelax]

Thanks for pics(&taking the time to post your real time Play-by-Play/thoughts).

*The last pic(Bottom R) Section 3 certainly had a little clustering(Gold mining opportunity).


Continued Success,

And if I remember correctly, that 14iar banker run, was very lax weak wagering by so many at a full table.

What happened was something along the following.  When those 4iar Bankers came out just before the 14iar Bankers, everyone was hyped up.  Wagering larger on the bankers and pressing up.  All verbally saying how bankers would do the come back because the bankers were behind the players, etc.  Then those 3 natural players iar killed it all.  Bankers had fairly good hands, like a 7 and a natural 8 to players natural 8 and natural 9.  I forgot the third one.  Then the tie was a three card 9-9 tie.  Everyone saying, "can't even win with a 9"! 

Then most go back to players side I recall.  Light wagering with most left on bankers, then it turns and bankers come out like ghostbusters, but no belief. 

Only a few did extremely well.  Most lost or barely covered what they were down in the shoe.  Basically same thing when all those players came out after that 14 iar Bankers at the end!