Please login or register.

Topic: Chasing The 3rd Col_  (Read 3121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chrisbis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • View Profile
Chasing The 3rd Col_
« on: July 09, 2013, 02:15:00 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Chasing the 3rd Col_

    I invite all to come and comment.

    Today, I spotted Priyank's Roulette Assist Tracker, and duly downloaded it.

    When I saw the small, neat GUI of the Felt/Table layout, I was immediately struck by something......
    that, when viewed above like that, and in the Vertical plane as seen,
    there are noticeably more Blacks in Col_1 and Col_2  .......than Blacks in Col_3

    Now I my guess is this has been talked about for years, in the various portals of Roulette chatter,
    and where players congregate, but I never noticed it so blatantly before.

    I wonder what work has been done on it, with a view to tracking until say you have 3 or 4 landings in the Col_3
    and then bet RED+ Col_1 +Col_2 in a concerted pattern to say win three in a row.
    Then re-track.
    Obviously, Zero is a 'bummer' outcome.

    I just played a small 52 spin game at Bet Voyager European Roulette, and quickly made it to +50 Euros,
    playing with 1.00 unit value when betting, and 0.01 when tracking.
    I was in fun money, so there was no pressure.....!

    I played a little "Out-Of-Balance" game, with more units on the EC (RED) and equal bets on the two Col_(s)

    Just wondered what anyone thought.
    Yes, I know its mechanical......again, but looks like there is a very small advantage to be had, if there are a few
    previous spins landing in Col_3, and therefore reduce the drawdown.
    (Especially, if those previous spins were on 6/15/24/33 ......only four Black Numbers in Col_3)

    I also, had a staking plan with a reverse gear, after 3 wins, so I could still play the advantage bet,
    but not give away my BR net gain so quickly.

    Start bet was :- 4 RED+ 2 Col_1 + 2 Col_2 = 8 units total = my base level (lets call it +1)

    then + 2 level was a Marty on all 8 RED+ 4+ 4Col_(s)= 16

    The lower bets were:- 2 RED      +1      +1 Col_(s) = 4      (called that level -1)
    and.......                       1 RED   +0.5 +  0.5 Col_(s) = 2      (level -2)
    and.......                    0.5 RED +0.25+ 0.25 Col_(s) = 1      (level -3)
    and......                   0.25 RED +0.13+ 0.13 Col_(s) = 0.51 (level -4)

    All those lower values are like a reverse gear, even when winning, to slow down any potential give away.

    I used 0.01 on RED to track all other bets with, looking for Col_3 spins.
    I will leave this with U, until next time!

    BTW, I have since concluded, the Imbalance across the EC/Col_(s), is not required.
    It need balance!)

    Offline Priyanka

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 219
    • Gender: Female
    • No limits...
      • View Profile
    Re: Chasing The 3rd Col_
    « Reply #1 on: July 09, 2013, 04:33:50 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Chris, why black + columns and not red+columns?

    Offline Chrisbis

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 801
      • View Profile
    Re: Chasing The 3rd Col_
    « Reply #2 on: July 09, 2013, 05:05:35 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • I like black! lol (I look slimmer in Black)

    Can do Red + too.....shall we try it?

    Actually, joking aside, I did "Male-Chicken-up" there didn't eye, as I identified the advantage-
    (that were not many blacks in the 3rd Column), but then in error, bet on the wrong colour to cover the abundance of reds in that Col_3

    I will change the original post to reflect the need to bet on RED, not Black.
    Thanks Yanks for pointing that obvious error.

    Offline Chrisbis

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 801
      • View Profile
    Re: Chasing The 3rd Col_
    « Reply #3 on: July 20, 2013, 04:53:09 pm »
  • ReplyReply