+ Register

[Chrisbis]

Chasing the 3rd Col_


I invite all to come and comment.
Background.....


Today, I spotted Priyank's Roulette Assist Tracker, and duly downloaded it.


When I saw the small, neat GUI of the Felt/Table layout, I was immediately struck by something......
that, when viewed above like that, and in the Vertical plane as seen,
there are noticeably more Blacks in Col_1 and Col_2  .......than Blacks in Col_3


Now I my guess is this has been talked about for years, in the various portals of Roulette chatter,
and where players congregate, but I never noticed it so blatantly before.


I wonder what work has been done on it, with a view to tracking until say you have 3 or 4 landings in the Col_3
and then bet RED+ Col_1 +Col_2 in a concerted pattern to say win three in a row. [smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]
Then re-track.
Obviously, Zero is a 'bummer' outcome. [smiley]aes/erm.png[/smiley]


I just played a small 52 spin game at Bet Voyager European Roulette, and quickly made it to +50 Euros,
playing with 1.00 unit value when betting, and 0.01 when tracking.
I was in fun money, so there was no pressure.....!


I played a little "Out-Of-Balance" game, with more units on the EC (RED) and equal bets on the two Col_(s)


Just wondered what anyone thought.
Yes, I know its mechanical......again, but looks like there is a very small advantage to be had, if there are a few
previous spins landing in Col_3, and therefore reduce the drawdown.
(Especially, if those previous spins were on 6/15/24/33 ......only four Black Numbers in Col_3)


I also, had a staking plan with a reverse gear, after 3 wins, so I could still play the advantage bet,
but not give away my BR net gain so quickly.


Start bet was :- 4 RED+ 2 Col_1 + 2 Col_2 = 8 units total = my base level (lets call it +1)


then + 2 level was a Marty on all 8 RED+ 4+ 4Col_(s)= 16


The lower bets were:- 2 RED      +1      +1 Col_(s) = 4      (called that level -1)
and.......                       1 RED   +0.5 +  0.5 Col_(s) = 2      (level -2)
and.......                    0.5 RED +0.25+ 0.25 Col_(s) = 1      (level -3)
and......                   0.25 RED +0.13+ 0.13 Col_(s) = 0.51 (level -4)


All those lower values are like a reverse gear, even when winning, to slow down any potential give away.


I used 0.01 on RED to track all other bets with, looking for Col_3 spins.
I will leave this with U, until next time!
cheers
[attachimg=1]   .........          [attachimg=2]

[attachimg=3]

BTW, I have since concluded, the Imbalance across the EC/Col_(s), is not required.
It need balance!)

[Priyanka]

Chris, why black + columns and not red+columns?

[Chrisbis]

I like black! lol (I look slimmer in Black)


Can do Red + too.....shall we try it? [smiley]aes/confused.png[/smiley]


EDIT
Actually, joking aside, I did "Male-Chicken-up" there didn't eye, as I identified the advantage-
(that were not many blacks in the 3rd Column), but then in error, bet on the wrong colour to cover the abundance of reds in that Col_3


I will change the original post to reflect the need to bet on RED, not Black.
Thanks Yanks for pointing that obvious error.
cheers.
C

[Chrisbis]

[attachimg=1]  [attachimg=2]