+ Register

[carpanta]

This is an extract (translated by me from Spanish) from the book Syncrodestiny, author Deepak.

"What most people call luck is nothing more nor less than the application of synchronicity in the fulfillment of our intentions.
Through the lessons of synchrodestiny, it is perfectly possible to adopt a state of mind that in life there are opportune moments and when we can identify them and take profit of them, everything can change.
"Luck" is what we call in the modern world to name the miraculous.
Thus, synchronicity, meaningful coincidence, miracle or good luck, are different ways of referring to the same phenomena.
As we have seen, the intelligence of the body is manifested through coincidence and synchronicity. Also the broader intelligence of nature and the ecosystem-the great web of life-
and the fundamental understanding of the universe.
When we begin to consider the coincidences as opportunities, each acquires meaning.
Each match (coincidence) becomes an opportunity for creativity."

This is related to what Gizmotron tries to teach in his posts.
Basically I agree with his stance.

[Gizmotron]

        Only a clairvoyant having mystical powers can guess what is going to happen in the near future and can claim to win, flat bet. Normal human beings need to either take risk with money management or totally rely upon luck to get a positive variance which can let him win flat.       

You have know idea how close to an advantage this is. I've already shared what that is at this forum. There must be a price. You can find it on your own. Or you can ignore it altogether, perhaps it will remain somewhere in the back of your mind.

[Gizmotron]

               Such misconceptions lead a player to think that a positive progression or regression could be a remedy to all gambling uncertainties but in long run playing for a "ride" or "streak" doesn't win by itself. If they could win, casinos would have dried a few hundred years ago.

You are correct that riding win streaks is not enough. In fact you must overcome the impulse of greed. If you stay, because it's not enough, then you will probably play until you lose your already won gains.

[Gizmotron]

" This is related to what Gizmotron tries to teach in his posts."

It is impossible for me to not see real opportunities as well as real pitfalls. Even though others can't see them as clear as a bell, I can. Many years ago, it seemed like I was completely on my own. Example my discussions over the years regarding Elegant Patterns. Most people don't get it. That's fine. Try to ignore a sleeping dozen that sleeps for more than 30 spins. I dare the scoffers to test for how often they occur. That number might surprise even the most ardent of my critics. Not taking advantage of them by a player seems to be some kind of disservice to proper gaming style.

[Albalaha]

Betting upon virtual limits can be a wise idea but to get such things will need thousands of spins. they are little better than random betting but again not a panacea in themselves.

[Gizmotron]

Ten sleeping dozens in a row are common. Playing a game of balance against them, using flat bets, and using a goal of just two wins to establish balance and fulfillment of session results is easier than depending on progressions to prop up wishful thinking.

[The Crow]

The only thing I am learning from this thread is how each individual is trying to out do the other. How about giving some examples that support your claims, so the rest of us, non participants, can say, "ah ha, I get it."

Over the years, I have witnessed many, on this thread, give discredit to others without having walked in their shoes. It is a pattern that is so predictable. What are the chances of me being correct? 50 percent? Correct?

The Crow

[Gizmotron]

TC, download my practice software, make 150 spins, scroll down the charts for dozens and columns, identify the sleeping dozens and the sleeping columns. Identify the context of the current conditions for how long sleepers are occurring. You now have knowledge of the current state of the conditions. Place a bet according to the current conditions when the next sleeper begins to form. One of two things will happen. The conditions will either continue or they won't. You need acquired playing experience to learn how to best deal with changing conditions.

I hope you can see this as an example.

[Rolex-Watch]

WOW, from such a simple question, which was answered within the first few posts BTW, The thread has now grown serious legs. 

[Albalaha]

@gizmo,
                Are you referring to regression towards Mean and its strategic use?

[Gizmotron]

@gizmo,
                Are you referring to regression towards Mean and its strategic use?

No. I'm using the balance of the odds. You have  65% chance of winning each bet. You have a 40% chance of winning two bets. If you win the first bet then you can only lose half of the balancing from the two bets to one method. It takes two wins to equal one loss. I'm betting on the two other dozens or columns to win while the third is sleeping. With flat bets at $500 or $1,000, two wins are enough. The trick is to not start out in a downturn.

[XXVV]

This is an extract (translated by me from Spanish) from the book Syncrodestiny, author Deepak.

"What most people call luck is nothing more nor less than the application of synchronicity in the fulfillment of our intentions.
Through the lessons of synchrodestiny, it is perfectly possible to adopt a state of mind that in life there are opportune moments and when we can identify them and take profit of them, everything can change.
"Luck" is what we call in the modern world to name the miraculous.
Thus, synchronicity, meaningful coincidence, miracle or good luck, are different ways of referring to the same phenomena.
As we have seen, the intelligence of the body is manifested through coincidence and synchronicity. Also the broader intelligence of nature and the ecosystem-the great web of life-
and the fundamental understanding of the universe.
When we begin to consider the coincidences as opportunities, each acquires meaning.
Each match (coincidence) becomes an opportunity for creativity."

This is related to what Gizmotron tries to teach in his posts.
Basically I agree with his stance.

Thanks so much to Carpanta for this brilliant quotation and link to a fine book, and to Gizmotron for his efforts to be crystal clear in explanations. Well done. And to take TC's point also , as an example of taking wisely 2 wins as sufficient I refer to the Clump Theory examples ( deliberately a ridiculously simple bet) in my Blog Section latest postings. Very constructive efforts everyone.

[esoito]

Welcome, Carpanta. And that's a most interesting contribution to the thread.

[Rolex-Watch]

Hi Gizmotron,

There was another thread by BEAT-THE-WHEEL ( which mysteriously disappeared ) in which he posted a sequence of wins and losses - 30 straight losses followed by 9 straight wins - and challenged the forum to find a solution. A very unlikely scenario, but easy enough to beat with the reverse martingale. All losses would be cleared and 1 unit profit made after only 5 consecutive wins. Are you suggesting that something like that can win consistently if you bet the same as the last decision ( which would have you winning every streak )?

I couldn't locate that thread either, so I will post a solution here, incidentally Izak has been beating runs such as LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWW for years

Basically write out a Labby, 1, bet 1 unit, keep on betting 1 unit until a win, so in the case of 10  losses, 20 losses, or 100 losses in a row will be the sum of your draw-down.  When you finally snare a win, bet the current draw-down + 1 unit. 

The obvious problem is when you get; LLLLLLLLLLLLLWLWLW you get creamed, for more details of this wild ride nutjob progression, get hold of any of Izak's systems prior to the last few years (there are 100's to choose from) , the MM is the same in nearly all of them, but hey it makes great advertising.