+ Register

[Mr J]

(Any examples will be for the 00 wheel). I apologize ahead of time if something similar to this has been posted over the last 15 years, I don't read it all. This is flat betting, 2 numbers, side by side on the wheel.

It helps a lot if your history board is working. This is quite basic, re-betting a SMALL section (2) of the wheel if temporarily hot. When starting off, look at the history board for the MOST CURRENT 2 numbers next to each other, NO GAP between them. Lets say its the 8/12. (not the 8/29)

We bet the 8/12 for a minimum of 15 spins. During those 15, keep an eye out for the next POSSIBLE bet. Two other numbers side by side but we do not include a new number with an old number........such as, the 19 and the 8.

Anyways, if no hit after 15, pick a new set of 2. You might have to wait a few spins but its kind of rare to sit around and wait long.

On the hand, lets say you get a hit during the 15 spins. Does not matter if its the first attempt or the 15th attempt........ you add 12 more spins to your total, still betting that 8/12.

We'll say the first 10 spins were no wins, you now get a hit. You have 5 spins left (from the 15), a win does NOT count towards your spin count. You add 12 with the 5, you now bet the 8/12 for the next 17 spins. After 17 spins, no hit? that's fine, drop the 8/12 and choose a different two. The 8/12 CAN be used again with future betting if it starts hitting again.

During those 17, it hits again.....you now add 9 more spins to your total. We are always subtracting 3 after a hit.......15, 12, 9, 6, 3, 0....DONE, 45 POSSIBLE total spins but a minimum of 15.

Do NOT switch the 2 numbers during your session. Ride it out until its time to switch pairs. This betting takes advantage of 2 side by side hitting a lot while limiting it to only 15 if it fails to hit again. I like this method a ton and no, I can not NAME methods very well (lol). Questions/comments? Try to be civil with your remarks, we are adults. Well, most of us.

Ken

[greenguy]

Interesting name, interesting method.

Question,

Let's say you start betting your two numbers and two spin later two other numbers hit side by side.

We keep betting the first two and it happens to take 45 spins to complete but in that time no other two numbers hit side by side.

Do we then start betting the two numbers that hit 43 spins ago straight after we started betting for 45 spins, or do we wait for something more recent to hit?

[Mr J]

If it took 45 spins to complete, that's GREAT news, a bunch of wins.

I would wait for the next 2 side by side, only because it will not take long. Most boards hold 12-15 numbers, it won't take long. Also, I'm glad you brought something up I forgot to mention...... lets say you are betting that 8/12 for only 15 spins (no hits).

During those 15, the 26/30 have recently hit (it will be our next bet) but the 26 has hit again. When we start betting, we start it at 15 attempts, we do NOT add 12 on only because we were not betting on it at the time !!

Ken

[Mare]

The problem with this type of system is a long waiting period to the number.


The point is, while we wait 15 spins at other positions appear sometimes two triggers that give goal in this interval.
This is a problem I encountered with the different kinds of systems so that such options should be avoided.
As you said in one of the earlier posts, the attack should not take more than a few spins.
Much better results we get with for example 6 spins in one location and if there is any one trigger we play the two side by side is also not more than 6 spins. If one pair achieve hit, can be obtained with 6 spins.

[Mr J]

"is a long waiting period to the number" >>> I'm unsure what this means?

What I like most about this method....if no hit within 15, we bail, no "its due again to hit" type of thinking.

If we get a few hits, we add on, less and less total spins, with a MAX. of 45. We'll never get crazy and bet the next 70 spins on it. It has a decent cut off point (imo).



Ken

[Wally Gator]

Is there a reason the strategy calls for playing only one couple at a time?

[Mr J]

Because I don't bet 28 numbers like 73% of the other members......I guess that's why.

Ken

[Turner]

Because I don't bet 28 numbers like 73% of the other members......I guess that's why.

Ken

86.34% of statistics are just made up  [smiley]aes/wink.png[/smiley]