BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Topic: Why Does This Bet Work?  (Read 25663 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline XXVV

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1694
  • Gender: Male
  • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
    • View Profile
Why Does This Bet Work?
« on: January 25, 2015, 11:45:11 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Fundamental question.

    I have been thinking on this recently and to put down a few ideas might encourage some other thoughts and even suggestions/ ideas from others. There is no point in declaring well it can't work, or it doesn't work, or its an aberration - that would be like King Canute storming at the incoming tide before he was swept away.

    Characteristics of this bet....

    # 1  short cycle - able to work within a 5 spin timeframe including observation to close of cycle with profit

    # 2  uses flat staking

    # 3  targets nine numbers straight up ( but can in some sets focus on streets and splits to economise on outlay).

    # 4  distribution of hits shows peak at first betting opportunity a where also net return is highest
     
    # 5  uses cluster analysis ( will be outlined later)

    # 6  because targets are straight up bets the 35-1 payout enables high returns

    # 7  it is in the predictive change or end of a cluster and the potential start of another that net profit is released

    # 8  the bet character often enables very short cycle bursts of earnings as high as 10 units per spin average, and earnings in excess of 2 units per spin on extended cycles in about 30-50% of sessions. Such fertile cycles which are encouraged to be harvested by the bet criteria appear to exceed the negative correction cycles which are also often mitigated by stop loss strategies.

    Why is it that in so many observed phenomena within short cycles of roulette outcomes that play of such from start to finish are a losing bet? However if one waits for a 'gap' to reveal whereby an expected outcome whose range of appearance is studied and known, and the appearance is delayed/ overdue, then the 'gap' can be played as one of many characteristic gaps for a short period in order to access profit and then close the attack once achieved.

    Such play requires lots of patience, a suitable bank, a suitable trigger/ signal to start, and an ability to stop within a key period if the attempt is unsuccessful ( stop loss).

    Cluster analysis however looks below the surface to note a game within a game.

    It appears that the binding force ( same) that tends to bring a cluster together and holds it in place (from 3 to 12 or more spins), is overcome by a de-construction force ( change) which has sufficient power to break down the prior pattern and replace it with one from within a small known family of prioritised new patterns. Such relative regularity of performance ( it does skew negatively sometimes in delay) enables prediction much more fertile than probability theory expectations at the surface level and thus beats the negative expectation game. It works on another level from surface appearances.

    Evidently, individual spins/ outcomes are connected.



    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #1 on: January 26, 2015, 01:14:22 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • In order to satisfy the put-up or shut-up principle regarding discussion of bets on the forum I am conducting testing of the bet as defined here on 30 randomly selected sessions of Wiesbaden Table 3. Often these are quite lengthy sessions, exceeding 330 spins so the total test sum may be around 10,000 spins.

    So far 10 sessions have been tested.

    The remainder will be tested during February and March.

    Parallel with this will be an analysis illustrating which category the session falls into from earlier definition, and a short review of the optimum approach for every session. In two thirds of the samples it will be most probable that a much more efficient and better result would have been achieved by stopping much sooner than at session end, often within 60 spins. The outcome result will most likely still be positive ( and that is how I have defined the winning edge from prior tests several years earlier) by going to the end of the session but in comparing 'efficient play' result with 'full session play', the shorter game will probably considerably improve the result. I am keen to measure this.

    That is enough theory.

    I have always been interested in the interplay between theory and practice in Architecture and now Fine Art in the broadest sense. Sometimes one comes before the other and inspires the other.

    In this case once you set out to search, and you are determined, you will find answers, and these can be refined through practice.

    Now we will let the numbers speak for themselves.....

    Offline TheCaviarKid

    • Rising Member
    • **
    • Posts: 38
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #2 on: January 26, 2015, 10:23:04 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • In order to satisfy the put-up or shut-up principle regarding discussion of bets on the forum

    I take that to mean that someone actually reveals their bet. Anyone can take 10-30 sessions using previous spins and show a method working. That doesn't really prove anything.

    Reading your last few posts, it sounds like you are claiming that spins are not independent and that you have an actual edge over the game of roulette. If that's so and you are not going to reveal said bet, then at the very least, you should play the same 10-30 sessions at one of the live online casinos and be able to achieve comparable results. I read in your blog that you opened a couple of accounts at dublin and bet365. Somthing like that would go some way to verifying your claims.

    "Sometimes it is the people we imagine nothing of, who do the things we can not imagine."

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #3 on: January 26, 2015, 03:19:53 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • I take that to mean that someone actually reveals their bet. Anyone can take 10-30 sessions using previous spins and show a method working. That doesn't really prove anything.

    Reading your last few posts, it sounds like you are claiming that spins are not independent and that you have an actual edge over the game of roulette. If that's so and you are not going to reveal said bet, then at the very least, you should play the same 10-30 sessions at one of the live online casinos and be able to achieve comparable results. I read in your blog that you opened a couple of accounts at dublin and bet365. Somthing like that would go some way to verifying your claims.

    Thanks TCK for your contribution.

    There has been already some discussion on the issue of 'revealing' a bet. It was agreed that is not necessary in detail and I certainly do not intend to. However my objective is to demonstrate what can be done in roulette by approaching matters in fresh ways, and encourage others to develop individual bets that can beat roulette. Test data does of course need to be validated and that is why I have cited the table, the casino and the date of data. Anyone can access these sessions and if requested I can provide a file. These are not reverse engineered or post selected but are data bases used in earlier research for other sets and bets and dated in sequential time order. Now I am simply accessing these one by one and seeing what unfolds for this particular set and this bet which is of interest because it is so simple.. In this case the reader may choose to trust my integrity or not. It is a journey in which I invite companions to share the experiences. You do not have to participate - it is a choice.

    I have shown a method of research and development and have shared many principles that are worthwhile and that will assist others.

    In my earlier posts on this forum there is a clear description of my approach and methodology. In a recent post I provided the nine spins that resulted in a short cycle win ( +99 units). For two hours on the post thread live I  showed the sequence of hits ( there were four) - I did this to reward attentive readers. The information was later deleted.(  I quite enjoy that sort of theatre. I once three  years ago for 24 hours actually printed out in full one of my bets and deleted it on careful reflection of consequences).

    However with some intelligence and assembling what I have already provided, it would be possible to work out how the bet is constructed. No one has contacted me however to enquire or to discuss options or thoughts. For such valuable information I am rather surprised that no one has shown that initiative. I would. One of my business methodologies is to contact anyone without hesitation if it interest me - and that strategy has paid huge dividends. It is a bit like Angel Funding. 1 success in 100 attempts is more than enough to justify the effort. Sheer perseverance opens many doors.

    As I have always stated I use this Blog as a working mental 'slate' or pad/ window - a sort of thinkpad. I develop ideas, and in the process, share principles. It is a useful tool for me and by talking/ writing this vastly improves the ordering of thoughts and creative ideas.

    The 30 sessions at Wiesbaden will be documented and it will be very clear that the efficiency of the bet can be massively improved by smart timing. Knowing when to stop ( after a period of return in excess of pre-determined expected return, ie fast gain) will improve results by at least 50% I would anticipate from early work. Such a principle can be applied to many bets.  My work here emphasises and demonstrates this principle.

    Next step after that phase will be the live play at Bet 365 and Dublin Bet where I have had accounts for years and find them both to be reliable and never have experienced any difficulty in returning profit payouts.

    My daily play at my local B+M Casino of course surely counts for much and I had earlier presented over 30 sessions of results. My spin data from there is always able to be verified by colleagues here. I always record data and file. My bet is at work and demonstrated there daily.

    Purpose of my work here is not to 'prove' my bet - that was done  7 years ago when I switched to flat staking  - but to illustrate and explore some interesting ideas that are associated, such as why the bet should work at all, and the interlinking and overlapping of sequences of outcomes, ie the inter-connectedness of independent outcomes.

    By thinking through here 'aloud' some of my realisations, such as the choice to ( sometimes) discard earlier inefficient or inconsistent bets such as the WF theory work, in order to streamline efficiency- I hope to encourage others to constantly re-evaluate work and face up to problems and turn those realisations into opportunities.

    Thanks Caviar Kid for your interest and I hope this helps explain a little more my intentions here.


    Offline Biagle

    • Steady Member
    • **
    • Posts: 79
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #4 on: January 26, 2015, 05:17:25 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • hello, as you know im following you. Does this bet has something to do with clumbing theory? because it is 9 numbers.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #5 on: January 26, 2015, 07:35:16 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Hi Biagle.

    Thanks for your query. No this bet is not the same as clumping technique which is really 2 or more numbers  that derive exclusively  from just one group of wheel section of numbers or other groups such as finales or table positions. You are right that I suggested these could be viewed as groups of nine numbers for convenience of  viewing and pattern recognition. Clumping could also be applied to a spread of only 2-3 numbers as well. Clumping is an opportunity bet but you have to wait to see the right characteristics. It may occur say less than 10% of all outcomes.

    By contrast the bet I am referring to here SF, is always a combination of two parts and occurs more than 60% of all outcomes.
    It is much more complex in theory but actually as this set, is actually very simple when played and applied to the table layout. I think I mentioned the other day it is made up of a short term cluster of some of the 18 numbers from two groups. That cluster (same)comes to an end and my bet predicts the remaining nine numbers from which ( at least) one number will arrive as a result of change.

    Good question Biagle.

    The clump theory is a useful bet. Hope that helps you.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #6 on: January 30, 2015, 11:01:05 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • This is a little further information which can be used as 'in principle' for your own research but is an application developed from my bet.

    This is a distribution ratio based on session, and session type, and how to thus deal with the particular type of category.

    In short summary and based on a suitable large sample I have found, for my bet, the following types and distribution ....

    Type A  --- about 3 to 5 times per 10 sessions

    Type B  ----about 2 to 3 times per 10 sessions

    Type C  ----about 2 to 3 times per 10 sessions

    Type D  ----about 1 to 2 times per 10 sessions


    Type A - the most positive outcomes keeps on trending to new all time high  ( continue)

    Type B - starts well and then re-traces ( caution and stop after 20% retrace)

    Type C - starts poorly and then improves ( caution, bale out if -100, and when in credit cash out)

    Type D - starts badly and continues to nosedive ( get out as soon after -100 as possible)


    This based on use of a 500 unit bank and a modest goal to achieve ( at least ) a 5% gain ( +25) per session on the session.

    Simple strategy is to achieve consistent gains, mitigate loss, accentuate gain.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #7 on: February 04, 2015, 07:20:21 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Taking this a step further - and this is based on study and research of a one bet application - not several bets simultaneously- this is a very interesting idea. We focus and  extend play on the optimum sessions, and in real live time play you can see how these qualify - two winning bets in a row and both hitting strongly early in the cycle to give good returns.

    Other sessions types fall away and reveal themselves live really quickly.

    A.. best type - keep playing until an eventual re-tracement which might be 100 spins away. Profit can be +200 units - no limit

    B. next - fair start but falls way after a modest profit - get out with a small profit

    C. next - starts poorly but recovers - get out at break even

    D. worst type about 2 to 3 per 10 sessions in tough cycles and they may well be consecutive - mitigate loss - get out with a stop loss say at -120 units

    Net effect reflects positive edge of this bet.

    No bet can avoid loss - but loss can be controlled by quick exit.

    Winning can be extended. Be the dragon - play on while winning.

    Such an overview approach to play helps reinforce the positives and gives a strategic approach to roulette.

    Hope this helps./ R.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #8 on: February 14, 2015, 10:47:34 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • In the past month since the previous two posts were written I have played live roulette quite frequently ( and further tested and reinforced the above findings) and re-written my source book on the private bet, reviewed many of my earlier bets and applications. By writing down ( and thus explaining as you would do as if talking) this makes clearer the process and reasons for the play and even leads to further questions and research to be conducted.

    Despite some of the grandiose claims and risk taking using progression applied by some writers and players of baccarat, having seen some of the catastrophic damage done to lives by progression play, I prefer to work with roulette, and this will be a good opportunity to state the reasons. Recall one of my mentors lost over $1 million in LV and that was over 25 years ago when the value would equate to $3M today. He played roulette but he used sophisticated extended progressions. He still got beaten by a rogue wave. After later failures in London, after play at the Ritz, that individual had to endure a complete breakdown and later gave up gambling. Think through the consequences of poor choices. Always apply a stop loss, but where emotions are involved and not controlled and harnessed, disaster may be a consequence, with further implications. Think it through....

    In order to access the possibility of  significant profit in baccarat and in several casino card games it is necessary to have a large bank, and by the disclaimers issued by those advocates, it is funding 'you can afford to lose'. It seems progressions are essential for such work.

    This is absolute madness of course. Who is going to raise $50,000 as risk capital and then see it potentially evaporate, whilst in the meantime in other compartments of this dream life have a mortgage free home and a $500,000 equity investment fund. Perhaps it is a little tongue in cheek. What percentage of the population, and what proportion of the readers on this Forum can qualify to be in this category.

    My suggestion, to avoid the drama, is instead to study and play roulette. Access a suitable but modest risk bank - 1000 units would be ample- and then build patiently and professionally. There may be a few false starts, but in due course the player who has real specialised knowledge will be able to accumulate at the rate on average, flat staking, at +5% per session. Playing 5 sessions per week ( they may only be half an hour duration and free from stress, anxiety and high bp, free of bad temper fear and bad language) the RB can be doubled monthly. Within a year or two there will be adequate surplus returns to enable roulette applied semi professionally to assist with the priorities of living for the player and family.

    You just need a vision, a plan, knowledge and realistic application to suit your personal style.

    The beauty of roulette is that it is fast ( a spin per minute live) and it pays 35-1 for an inside table hit. It is a private game - you do not have to share a table with actors or blowhards, you just focus and concentrate.

    Mind you, some extraordinary scenes can be witnessed. Yesterday after finishing my session - it was a slippery small loss- I had a beer upstairs on the beautiful mezzanine level which looks out over the casino floor below and the chandeliers above. I was watching the NZ cricketers win at the World Cup - the live game was only a few km away to the north and you could virtually hear the crowd when another wicket fell. Below me I watched an amusing but rather sad spectacle at one of the roulette tables. There were about five key players. Two of them were past regulars and high stakes bettors. They both stood. Standing at a roulette table to me is like body language for am about to leave, and loss. By contrast if staying on a for several spins I would rather sit and maybe take notes or do some mental arithmetic. There is always a premium seat- the one where others cannot reach over you and distract or irritate you. That is such a waste of nervous energy.

    These two were standing and spending about $500 per spin often with quite a spread on the table and lots of splits. Between them and seated was a determined and rather stubborn Chinese lady who refused to be intimidated and doggedly reached out to place her bets with the two guys reaching all over and ahead of her to place bets, and under some time pressure, and in an increasing state of anxiety and frustration. They were all losing. Probably blaming each other but missing this little WF and wheel section gem.

    15
    3
    0
    35
    2
    0
    26
    18
    9
    22
    0

    This sequence works on so many levels and with so many bets a smart player would have scooped up rich dividends for section, finales, streets and WF. The three continued to tussle, squabble and continually lose money. In fact I saw them over this 20 minute episode lose thousands with only a one split to cover zero, hopelessly falling backwards and probably really having a bad time.

    Sure, a scene from Dostoevsky, yet this was only early afternoon, and a smarter location, despite the lack of choice of tables as it was early in the day, was the rapid roulette with separate screens which gives space and privacy. These three players had not realised their huge 'power loss' while fussing at their table, and all had regular fixed bets not adjusting for the short cycles of roulette.

    This is just observation and I am not judging these individuals as in the past I have been swept up in the moment, but with the benefit of detachment I saw this episode so clearly. It was a huge opportunity yet lost in the dust and confusion. Roulette needs keen observation, attention, discipline and reading of the game situation and immediate context.

    There are many successful bets in roulette and by studying gaps, and or programs that can even highlight suitable opportunities where you can even be advised where to bet ( internet live). By taking a reverse attitude, and reversing what everybody else does so badly, you can make play short, swift, successful and effective usually within 20-30 minutes of real time, and simply accumulate and build strings of wins. There will be occasional losses and setbacks but by positioning yourself to approach the game and sessions unlike all the others, you can succeed and win.

    Of course many gamblers - and those of poor self knowledge, low self esteem, limited vocabulary, poor self discipline, inability to focus or persevere, with no patience - will fail.

    Overlay upon that successful strategy outlined an ability to read sessions ( takes 10-20 spins to assess a trend) and note that 70% of them should be ended as soon as possible, but that 30% should be extended, and you have faster progress.

    It is fantastic to have a the tiger mentality when in a position of opportunity and attack, but also as part of the ideal technique, to be able to stonewall, buy time, pause, or fold and walk away at times, without distress.

    Loss is part of the game as much as winning, and by having a bigger view, and playing the right game, and the right way ( tuned also to your particular personality characteristics), you can leave a casino feeling fine at all times even though you have just experienced ( but understood) loss, or even a string of losses. You know that inevitably you will encounter a more than adequate string of wins that will erase the loss and continue the growth of your resources and your understanding.

    Experience teaches this.

    Now of course there will be some relatively affluent players who, knowing the game inside out, and matching their personalities to the style they choose to play will go for selected aggressive progressions at times. This will be based on hard evidence of usual ratios.  And yes it is thrilling to leverage the bets while winning. Awaiting the closure and relative anxiety of a progression to bridge a loss may also appeal. Those players know what they are doing.

    My observation is in the context of some recent baccarat posts that encourage really big punts. Just do it if you have to with eyes wide open.

    I am trying to show another way by using roulette which because of its payouts offers less risk exposure and the opportunity to leverage when in a strong position which can be often quite accurately read. The same may not be so with the relative uncertainties of the cards.

    It is possible to be managed and controlled through flat staking and the occasional step of unit value that can be applied as the RB grows but also in the 30% of sessions that can justify the apparent further risk exposure ( which actually is the reverse).

    Next notes will be on handling loss, and handling winning.


    Offline gr8player

    • Baccarat
    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 255
    • Gender: Male
    • Player's Edges
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #9 on: February 15, 2015, 01:52:37 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • And I, for one, will be anxious to read your thoughts on those subjects a well, XXVV.

    When pen is put to paper with such obvious flair, dynamics, and simply invaluable experience, it becomes an absolute pleasure to read.  I thank you for taking the time to allow us into your gaming world,especially given the most obvious: your vast expertise on the subject and the total control of your game.

    I, too, have posted much over the years regarding both the upside of winning and the upside (yes, upside) of walking a loss, and so I am fully cognizant of their relative importance.  But, that said, it does nothing to diminish my enthusiasm at reading your insights into the matter.  I, nor anyone, is ever too old or too experienced or too knowledgeable to deny the impact of learning something new, or even simply to reinforce their own beliefs.

    Lastly, the game of choice matters little when reading informative posts; the fact that I prefer Baccarat over roulette serves as no hindrance to glean your most useful insights on gaming, XXVV.

    Keep up the fine work, my friend.  You are truly an asset to this forum.

    Stay well.

    Offline RouletteKEY

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 116
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #10 on: February 15, 2015, 03:02:55 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • There may be a few false starts, but in due course the player who has real specialised knowledge will be able to accumulate at the rate on average, flat staking, at +5% per session. Playing 5 sessions per week ( they may only be half an hour duration and free from stress, anxiety and high bp, free of bad temper fear and bad language) the RB can be doubled monthly. Within a year or two there will be adequate surplus returns to enable roulette applied semi professionally to assist with the priorities of living for the player and family.

    You just need a vision and a plan and knowledge.


    yes...keep telling my kids about setting goals...lots of small achievable ones on the way to the promised land

    how do you eat an elephant...one bite at a time

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #11 on: February 15, 2015, 07:28:13 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Thanks for the replies. Please understand it has taken me many many years to make real progress and I have been guilty in the past of every possible mistake it is possible to experience. Eventually it came to facing up to some home truths.  Mine is just an honest attempt to lift my game and in so doing attempt to share that experience. Everyone will have different characteristics and personality traits so part of the goal here is to know yourself sufficiently well so the solutions fit. Also do not try to fix every flaw, but accurately focus on your strengths. The weaker parts of your game will gradually automatically diminish by actually not focusing on them ( otherwise you will cripple yourself). It is applied sports psychology. The strong aspects can be your unique style. What you give attention to and how you thus express yourself on these subjects can really accelerate your progress, as matters become clear, and 'bite size' ( to continue the elephant metaphor), they can be dealt with, and new ideas will illuminate the road ahead and through evident progress you will be further motivated as the tilt works in your favour. It helps to have a sense of humour and to be kind to yourself.

    Offline Carlitos

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 174
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #12 on: February 16, 2015, 07:33:58 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Thanks for sharing  :thumbsup:
    I do believe that clusters and their accumulation is something intresting.



    Carlitos  8)

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #13 on: February 16, 2015, 08:36:13 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • @Carlitos . Yes indeed it does not take long to prove it once you have the key. I have talked in principle above and through using groups of nine numbers. It is not hard to deduce through patient empirical observation that of the 37 or 38 variables, much more often than not a series of short cycles of temporarily dominant 18 numbers is in place.

    The nature of roulette, like everything else of course, is cyclic. It is just that in roulette we have a wonderful and quite rapid accumulation of examples before our eyes when we witness the game live, and for more substantial research data we have validated records from for example the German Casinos. Roulette provides observations of cycles within cycles.

    The shortest cycles you can argue are single spins, but if you take a further overview you can see cycles of 37/ 38 spins, and cycles in hundreds and thousands of spins. In fact vast 10,000 spin samples themselves can vary considerably in their internal characteristics depending on their source. One of my colleagues has now tested data over 50 million spins but deliberately tests in 10,000 spin modules to ensure there is no reverse engineering from from one source. This is RNG data. But the same observation applies on a smaller cycle scale to live spin data. I recall being shocked after using Wiesbaden data for years, and then finding some of my WF applications did not work for another German Casino. ( Of course that came clearer later when I realised that the variance within the sound basic idea of WF however required progressions in order to bridge some difficult and challenging situations - hence the WF is now dropped as a major tool because my private bet works on flat staking because it's edge is so strong).

    The reason the edge is so strong comes from the title of this piece - why does this bet work?

    It works because of the power of clusters and the force at work that breaks down clusters as well.

    Clusters operate on a smaller scale from 3 spin duration to sometimes as many as 17 spins.

    That is the reason the bet works quickly and with good returns, when in peak session mode. Of course at other more chaotic times when the corrective tide is in force it is more delayed and complex and part of my structure deals with stop loss and delays/ traps to prevent false signals and also where possible to just exit as fast as possible. Because we flat stake  it is quicker and easier to walk away. With progressions it can be a wrench, ie emotional to walk, because the loss will be substantial. That is what destroyed my Mentor all those years ago. His pride could not handle the perceived failure and loss, even though a multi millionaire. The truth is life consists of losses and wins. We just have to learn to deal with it, and be more detached**. When tens of thousands of units or more are involved that is not easy. It is easier if you are dealing with hundreds instead and your bet has quick recovery ability because of the payouts enabled in roulette at 35-1.

    ** being detached - refer to the next note

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1694
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: Why Does This Bet Work?
    « Reply #14 on: February 19, 2015, 12:07:58 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • By the way, and in the context of the note from Caviar Kid, I have deliberately paused before embarking on live internet play at Dublin Bet because they have teething problems with their new website. Also will wait for Bet 365. To be candid I do not like internet play because there is always a risk of loss of signal for whatever reason, and I have a colleague in NZ who has had some bad recent experiences with new DB.

    Thus you will have to do with my recent live spin results and also random access German casino data.

    Soon I will be opening a Google Blog site and my new email address is devoted to roulette  xxvvroulette@gmail.com

    This Forum has been and continues to be a delightful place to write, but with the Blog site I hope to be able to reach a bigger audience and interact more fully with contacts.

    As I have said before, I have invested many many years in roulette and it just gets better every year, every month, and within reason, I want to encourage others that roulette study is worthwhile and is actually very exciting and rewarding. What can be more exciting than finding a way to develop your own personal private bet - your own special secret.  And if it takes a treasure hunt to find it - well that is all the better. We all love the Quest, for the seemingly impossible.

    Thanks to computer power, the internet, and improved communications we can all accelerate our learning, and I can tell you there are many successful bets out there.

    You will find, if you do not know it already, that the hardest thing is not that search, but actually handling and managing it when you have it right under you nose.

    It is not the easy simple bet that CEH claimed for he was a con artist with some knowledge of roulette evidently but made so many mistakes in his communications that the really smart ones were wise to it, and the examples he always gave were facile little platforms. I was sucked in nevertheless in naivety but out of that misery came several years of good research and the opportunity to communicate with over a hundred individuals internationally.

    When you have a suitable bet you will know so through massive testing. The application in live play though may be another matter altogether and it is a slippery business. However in essence you will find it comes down to a refined essence with  a difficult simplicity.

    That is why I am about to write about Loss, and then about Win.