Well thank y'all.
Sometimes it surprises me how much I write. Probably too much as most readers here would say. However remember I did confess a long time ago I use this Forum on lots of levels, and it is a sort of practice, experiment, laboratory for me. Am not joking when I talk about the Greek Muse. Sometimes she is with us, sometimes not. Recall I also said the test of being able to understand and master a principle is to be able to explain it to another, or write about it clearly. Here we have the added complication of trying to be clear and yet be veiled at the same time- possibly a fool's errand. Some will think that.
Digging down into this, the intent to try to help those who 'prove themselves worthy' is really problematic. What am I trying to do and achieve here?
I want to demonstrate at an ideas level that it is possible to beat roulette. This in itself is an extraordinary challenge, not only to do, but to prove that you know how to without providing the exact formula.
When I correspond in harmony with a group of individuals over several years and there is polite exchange and mutual respect throughout, that to me is a wonderful achievement considering in most cases I do not personally know you. Yet despite the masks of the internet protocols we can make great progress. I can tell you one of the most sincere and respected friends I have with whom I share everything, is a friend I met through the internet, and actually through a roulette forum, who lives on another continent, and yet who I trust totally and vice versa, and with whom trusted exchanges continue to take place often daily. That demonstrates to me one of the principles I bang on about a lot. Truth is there, in fact is here, and you can find it if you look, but first you must look into your own heart and make efforts to mature and weed out nonsense.
So what I am saying is that I cannot reveal to you all of what I know, and a healthy scepticism is always essential for everyone at all times, because we can all fall short sometimes, but within reason you can carry through my thoughts and see where it goes. Hopefully it will make a positive difference to your roulette play, and perhaps improve your income.
As we agreed, only a fool would reveal a certain and sure private bet here. The consequences of such would be counter productive for all. Sometimes though partial winning bets ( win more than lose) can be shown and I hope the core WF, some of my own private bet, and the forthcoming Loss Bet may assist those who truly seek.
Some of the earlier responses by some Forum members here to some commercial ideas I was pitching were totally disappointing and my own naivety was shown up. The self righteous protectors of the 'purity' of the Forum floor showed up- a sort of Forum Police. Of course at all other times they contribute nothing and are mere passives. Sometimes I deliberately push at the boundaries and my mention of a sum deposit was (rightly) ridiculed. However my intention was actually simple and good hearted with three parties communicating and as far as I am aware no-one took the big leap to join the Foundation of which I am a lifetime member. That was not a problem as it was never intended for roulette players!!!
Yet look at the quality of some of our colleagues here on this roulette forum and their brilliance, and curiosity to explore and improve and succeed.
The way I accumulate knowledge and apply it is via a sort of snowball mentality, and my live play can be, unless well practiced, a bit lumpy and inconsistent. Yet with practice what a huge difference. Last night I played 42 spins at Dublin and by taking on board some of the CWB research findings, and overlaying this in an organised and prioritised way with existing knowledge, the result was fundamentally very encouraging.
So how can I share eventually what is worthwhile to share?
A few months ago I received a demand from a regular writer on another Forum who must visit here as one of the many shadows. He is Greek. He demanded I present him with a full explanation and methodology for my private bet. He also produced a pack of third party lies that I had 'stolen' this material from another complainant. What absolute rubbish and his writing successfully conveyed his mental state. Yet he writes today with confidence and charm to others who might not see behind the egotistic mask.
So material is not provided to a know-it-all ( he is of course in truth bankrupt in real knowledge and understanding) like him, or others like him.
My suggestion is this. I have a 3-5 year plan for investment and realisation of financial and economic goals. So much has already happened over the past 12 months, I see 2016 as a fantastic year for growth.
The entire foundation of my economic work is increased prosperity and abundance, yet of course that requires education and preparation to those concerned( including me) well in advance. You would be a fool to distribute free money.
I plan to write to a small handful of individuals with whom I have corresponded over the past 3-5 years, and when the work is completed sufficiently on my bets to a sufficient standard of accuracy and simplicity, I will offer them free my knowledge and support. This may take a while yet, but what is the point of knowledge if it cannot be shared at some time. However those individuals will be very carefully selected and the serious conditions and undertaking will be not to re-publish or sell on, but apply, and make a difference.
Recall I have attempted to assist some with my private work already, but I think I can say they were not ready, and my work was probably far too complicated, so this has been a lesson. As always, timing is everything.
So in the meantime the CWB research and study continues - this usually involves reading and re-reading several volumes of data, but the big difference is when you try to apply, test, test, test, and question, and run through live play for hours on end, holding in mind all the key sayings and statements that should be fully understood. Examine the words and meaning very very carefully. I actually believe the intention of CEH et al, and especially Razor, was to communicate sufficient information to enable access to solutions, but heavily veiled for all the reasons we have discussed. Further, the motives of individuals are often complex and contradictory.
Happy New Year everybody.