Thanks. No surprises at that stage.
You have established the fundamental equilibrium of the sample with the substitution of (any) two numbers for the zeroes. So yes this supports the theory that an internal substitution can be equivalent to exposure to zeroes. This may have strategic benefits to the bet construction later.
What about an ongoing interactive sampling where (say) every 78 spins** the two coldest sleepers are selected and used to replace the zeroes, then after every additional 78 spins the sleepers are reviewed and if necessary replaced, and so on, with the theory that the selection of the two substitutes will provide a diminished number of hits, and in fact thus magnify the return on the other selections which will be free of the frozen ones.
** or even truly iteratively, the review cycle could be reduced, or the moving 'window' could slide forward spin by spin.
This iterative process can steamroller along and enable a theoretical negation of the 'house edge'.
There can be empirical testing to see if 1,2,3,4 or 5 sleepers is the most effective model.
The testing I take it is being done on RNG data.
My experience teaches me that played in smaller quantum packets such as 39 or 78 spins then a further 2 or 4 x 78 to complete ( say a day/night at Wiesbaden #3) then the clumping and clustering of warm/ hots may be greater and thus maybe the cold ones may also be greater - but that can be tested in further experiments. I prefer live data on which to test and W3 can provide 300-400+ sample sizes in one session. The sessions must be played in interlinked but independent clusters, so the process of the selection of the 2 sleepers again needs to be conducted afresh at the start of a new day.
The logic can be reversed and the warm/ hotter numbers can be extracted in an iterative process for theoretically hot results. What is the optimum hot window spins - 2 or 3 x the numbers on the wheel I suspect, but as the 2 cycles are necessary to selected for the next spin cycle only, the window is an ongoing moving feature once the session is underway.
Now all this is most interesting and in due course I would be quite prepared to test such ideas live. This appeals to a part of my personality. Moon in Virgo for the scientists out there - 5000 years of Mesopotamian and Indian wisdom is not faulty - a long way from the daily generalised snippet nonsense.
Having seen Dr Oz today go through the 7 Chakras with a neurologist professional very successfully linking ancient assignations with food/ colour/sound and yoga, then we can see Medicine is becoming more attuned to East meets West meets Body + Mind. Holistic Medicine.
Questions arising out of this.
Numeracy characteristics for RNG compared to live for more 'co-operative' patterning behaviour for hot/ warm especially, and also cold.
Even today, I experienced the mental awareness of a slot machine being in 'co-operative' behavioral mode. In fact, as I related to a friend of mine by email today, I have had three such winning sessions exclusively playing slot machines and achieving a 60 unit to 300 unit end result over a week (on holiday) with an average gain of +80 units per session ( three sessions). I play attuned to a machine and judge the correct level of positive leverage to be applied to a winning stake, and time the ideal exit point - achieving +100 to +200% returns per session based on small amount of risk capital utilised.
Had any one of the 5 machines used in the week signaled a sign of correction (non-co-operation) then I would have quit at break even or stop loss. It was quite uncanny, cool and very rewarding to do this.
Notice how the human mind is able to 'form' the responsive best adaptive model to suit such wide differences as a clunky slot machine, smooth RNG data flows on sim, and live play sections within a session that runs till 3am in opulent surroundings.