Yes, I was joking around with it. This argument will never go away until someone proves they can win long term and big. Something that everyone will hear about is what's needed. One just has to to ask themselves this question first. Why would anyone deliberately sink the boat they are in?
Indeed. We will keep schtung, and merely hint and hide clues in the garden, behaving like annoying guardians, assuming there is something to guard and how will the sceptical know?
I think there are ways and ways to provide trails, and it is up to the seeker to ask the tough questions which probably will not be answered in public. That's okay there are lots of ways to do this. But how will we know the questioner is sincere? I have had this problem, and I can say it would always be better to meet. That is what I did with my two best mentors. Unforgettable meetings.
Some professionals are hyper sensitive about revealing winning bets, and for good reason.
So that is why there are limits to making information public. I want to see roulette remain a celebration and highlight within the casino environment.
Haven't heard back from Mike yet. He must be carefully wording his next statement or will it be just another re-hash out of the freezer.
As a player, a frequent player I have seen so many short cycle events that are astounding and as such am not particularly intimidated by 'constraints' of 'most likely', possible or probable. Too many team football games played as a possible, not as a probable perhaps.
Look at these pretty patterns ( short cycle stuff)...
3 ( possible symmetry ahead)
2 yes - so what is next - independent spins -lol max units on col 1
1 yes hit !!!
also today - why this in 250 spins casino RNG !!! Over 250 spins ( screen data) 13 hit 11 times 12 hit 10x 32 hit 10 x this sequence from 45 mins ago live at the casino
13 some reversals, penultimate cycles, and hot number clusters - euro wheel
then the hots started cooling as neighbours started hitting 27,0,6,36 -signal to quit. End of a cycle of trending clustering hots.
was with a colleague who played with a 40 unit bank and made +120 unit profit while I was sitting beside him in a 20 minute sequence
his skills now include key timing/ patience as well as more accurate bet selection
Mathematicians need to research short cycle behaviour
and the differences with medium and long cycle outcomes. I believe it is a uniquely performing sub set.
If there is a suitably qualified professional mathematician reading this Forum or who might be invited to read this Forum by an existing member, and who would like to research into cluster analysis/ short cycle behaviour in roulette, please note that I might be prepared to work and share existing knowledge/ data, subject to strict confidentiality and academic protocols. Responses through PM only.
One of my mentors actually worked with a University Mathematics Department in UK, and was associated also with an early BBC documentary on professional roulette play. That work has strictly no relation whatsoever with my current personal private work.
As GreenGuy so aptly commented recently 'making one's own luck' would be a great PhD Thesis in Applied Psychology and Mathematics. You will be aware of Sunil Padiyar and 'Psychic Gambling Supersystem'.
I would like to take the formal analysis and research to a formal definitive proven level although maintaining total legal privacy and ownership.
This is one of my goals within my 5 year commercial plan, and is very exciting as there will be several bets and applications involved. It is my personal view that all bets can be refined and refined ever further, and that there may be varying levels of efficiency among several.
It would be disastrous to have public access to this material.