Several months since my last report in this study.
I can tell you that these bets exist, and that the only way to access this knowledge is to be prepared to work, and to allow if alone, several years of study. If you are fortunate to work with colleagues this may accelerate your progress. There is vast material to be mined, and yes a lot of nonsense and false leads from some, yet from others remarkably helpful clues once you see things, even partially, from another perspective.
I have total respect for the very few that have taken this path, and my personal opinion is that this research and application is for a valid purpose. I have seen at first hand from myself, and others, bets that can overcome house edge and negative expectation. The essence though is to find such a concentrated and effective efficient bet that the term CWB can be applied where by definition the variance is so controlled that a small RB can enable consistent growth session by session.
My own private bet to which I often refer is crude by comparison in my view now, with too much variance, and further work in engineering is required. I think I know the BWAB focus where this can be achieved and curiously, and to the annoyance of some readers who have fixed views on such matters, this is in the realm of 'gamblers fallacy'. I have a focus now on an area of 'recovery after loss', and with suitable criteria applied and with a carefully selected window of play selected by empirical testing, the relative regularity of three closely spaced hits in response to an earlier delay, is the opportunity where I can really pull the curtain , and draw a circle around an energy field where a re-balancing of energies in the ecart occurs more than 92% of the time. The missing 8% need not bother and need not be chased as flat staking tips the scales in sufficient reliability.
This theory still requires a year of work in my view but has the makings of an effective bet.
However my total admiration goes to a bet that can be applied, spin by spin, after a short observation period, and achieves consistently a rate of return in excess of +10% edge. Do such bets exist? Is this a fantasy wish, a fallacy, a trick, a deceit? That is nothing to do with me, but after years of reading and research I am convinced these exist, in several forms. All the material to search through and filter, is out there. It just depends where you look and how you look, and with an appropriate attitude of respectful healthy scepticism, not naive belief.
It puts into perspective recent activity on this forum in roulette.
I have had to learn a lot of lessons this past few months, and emerging from it will be a more mature view.
Best wishes to those who search.