It is the beginning of May, a time of much significance and opportunity.
We have been through six months of profound study and search for true principles of a possible CWB, and by some colleagues extraordinary efforts to test theories for such a wonderful tool. It is an extremely difficult task and always it is necessary to question, be sceptical in a healthy sense, and not become lost in a labyrinth of tunnels and passages. Such was the ancient test, to retain clear vision and sanity even when faced with fear and uncertainty.
So a healthy and sane detachment is always needed to keep a clear head and clear vision.
Inevitably we all bring our past experiences into the present which can both help and hinder. Therefore it is necessary to prioritise, and as I say to my students in Architecture, we all need to reach in and out in order to build a framework, a structure, a matrix, that is unique for every one of us, that we can use as a foundation on which to build our our future house of experience.
A few get this idea, and sparkle with realisation and excitement of a way forward. There is no better feeling than to share and encourage another to gain insight into a life path.
The search within Roulette is made up of a series of choices and prioritisations based on a conscious commitment to much hard work ahead and a basic understanding of the nature of the game, its history, and its current forms.
What is so fantastic about our time is that research can be accelerated and thus precious time can be saved, avoiding the experiences of past efforts that may have resulted in a life's work coming to nothing. This is not a happy state, and there are times when this cloud has touched my experience also.
This year has seen fresh research into CWB ideas, writings and theories, as well as phenomenal progress and publication of computer research platforms which show great promise. Perhaps as with chess, ways can be found along various pathways to beat the game.
Personally, I enjoy a casino environment, sometimes alone, sometimes with a full house.
As always, as a frequent player, I have to be aware of the risks and tendencies in behaviour and tread a fine line sometimes to avoid the traps of compulsive and addictive behaviour. I recommend the links provided by Gizmotron in his latest posts. What amuses me is the constant movement like a fluid of our emotions and capacities for control. It comes with knowledge and practice but the mastery of professional control is always going to be a 'tendency towards' type phenomenon, never black and white or concrete linear. We watch and observe ourselves and learn from mistakes but never underestimate how long it may take to improve while other skills and capacities also have their cyclic time lines.
In other words it is where art meets science in performing at your best under the stress of live play and bringing to mind and action the best of your sum of knowledge and experience to date, while also learning from others.
So I notice how clever to pre program into technical play loss limits, and choices of optimum targets for gain as a percentage of risk bank. Also to determine for your bet selection view applied to your choice of bet with its unique characteristics so as to know the window of opportunity that may open for you, and thus to enable seizing the day, with attack and appropriate strategy.
It has been fascinating to observe the terminologies and approach from the VR work of TM. That these efforts have been published and shared with good results obtained , and to a considered extent is an excellent benchmark for us all.
So purpose of this thread is to sum my personal view, approach and beliefs at this time. One key difference between my personal work and that of the VR teams is that I work alone in a physical casino live, and thus must rely on my wits at any time. That is why my results can range from outstanding to diabolical -lol. As I say variance is still my major concern, but I would like to elaborate a little on progress I have made and give some guidance as to what I see as an embryonic CWB where there is some glimmer of worthy hope, and yet still very far from what we would consider as 'consistent'.
This is the sum of results I have achieved from testing from prior live spin data over the past week, being 10 sessions and just over 1000 spins recorded by me session by session at my local casino.
Winning sessions 7 and losing sessions 3
Best winning session +306 units in 137 spins and worst session -162 units in 96 spins (but was +81 units after 55 spins)
Private Bet on one set only ( focus on Columns) +537 units in 1014 spins
Column Bets as directed through P/B Cols 1 and 3 +30 units Cols 1 and 2 and 3 +40 units.
Sessions 1 and 2 were successful so the net results have never been in negative territory.
Obviously smart play can interactively close a session if reading of the game indicates trouble ahead and the losing session above was a classic where at worst the live player would have baled out at +0 at worst.
Note the Private Bet can be applied to over a dozen sets ( 4 groups of 9 numbers) and usually for live play I monitor 2-3 sets as well as the WF phenomenon. In this case I focused on the one set and the column bets when triggered. Of the data tested so far the straight single column target bet is most efficient in Column 1 and Column 3.
We can also search out a possible co-relation between the simple Table Set and triggers for Dozen targets. It is possibly similar in nature as the former approach and then it is a matter of tuning and tweaking the rules for max efficiency (non waste)
Now we can also investigate the possible relation between the R/B set and the R/B skew in Cols 3 and 2.
Last a frontier of work may be to inter-link these 2-3 tools into one CWB where the gaps between action may be reduced to such an extent that more spins are played live than waiting. We shall see, and what is that ideal ratio?
With practice three sets can be monitored just using casino cards thus not attracting undue attention.
Another path to explore is the use of sets for R/O and B/E, then Odd and Even sets. H/L is already monitored through Table Set but fresh overlays are possible.
Finally we can look at spreads of Splits, and even Corner Bets.
Easy once memorised.
In a further post I will go into a little more detail of the Bet Selection above and then the MM for max efficiency.
Avoiding excessive play or profit from any one casino will eventually be a major consideration.
I am sure this is a valid pathway and my priority is to enhance efficiency and reduce/ control variance. My focus is to have the methodology and strategy internalised so as to be completely undercover, without and free from technological computer help while live. I have various reasons for choosing this approach. I always however am open to multiple solutions and am convinced such a responsive system such as I am configuring can be refined and honed to enable a CWB. We never know what may yet unfold in science, and there is a lot of room for development also with the grey fuzzy areas of intuition and multiplicities. Best wishes to those on the VR pathway and similar ways also.
Hope this encourages you.