My session at The Star was on a live wheel rapid roulette console, with a minimum bet of $1 to $500 on the corners.

From what I have seen to date, there would appear no outcomes which give a warning of what is to come (either way), which is only to be expected in a random game.

Thanks Mocco. Most helpful - the rapid roulette consoles in Christchurch now feature two zero positions - is that the case in Sydney? It does not bother me as I just play 0-00 as a single bet independent account on a very slow progression but sufficient to provide a nice little bonus every now and then.

Individual

**spins**, read alone of course give no clue as to what may be about to happen, and in fact the sudden 7, 9 12 or worse can often follow a 1. However the point I am making today is that context, from 5-10-20 prior

**outcomes** ( result cycles) can provide some indication. Cycles tend to cluster and there are two main cycles - win ( accumulative)and loss (corrective). The loss clusters seem to spread over a 5-10 outcome window. Have a look at your data sheets. I 'transform' spins into 'outcomes' and of course there may be several corner bet variations, as there could also be 6 line variations or all manner of 16 targets. What we really seek are 16 numbers which are most likely to hit, therefore probably not sleepers, but possibly warming repeaters and candidates in a moving window. Now this is a special research field within WF theory and I believe has a great deal of promise.

Lastly I would like to mention the Jason Chan connection and his use of the 12-70-10 formula in contrast to the MB 8-44-10. Would you like to comment on this. I have been unable to contact Jason but have been in touch with ForeverBob who was a student of MB also.

Thanks very much for your study. I can tell you well in advance that of your 20,000 spins there will be a 90% strike rate, for the 1-4 groupings of bets.

I would certainly not expect flat staking to show any profit of course, but there is an opportunity with clever MM to handle an accumulating growth of profit and the first 2000 spins result is encouraging. There will be loss phases and win phases, and from my perspective a near break even result would be fantastic.

I have already stated that 100 spin samples are useful, but 30 sessions of 666 spins might be most appropriate on lots of levels,. However a tranche of 100 spins live is very playable ( 2 hours) and 30 sessions x 7 of that would be very practical as working model, but not definitive. It would be essential that large samples from widely varying live spin casinos be supplied as group characteristics from one location do skew results.

MM will be needed and the trick is to find by trial and error a simple practical ( not too complex) method for on site play.

As mentioned earlier I think 2 levels of 4 step progression is useful, and the losses ( 432 units) could be shredded into say 2- 3 parts and played on following sessions where the initial base table rate is $5 as opposed to $2.50, or some such stepping. A trio of winning sessions and the loss could be evaporated.

Loss sessions like win sessions tend to cluster so care should be taken.

I have described the circumstances where multiple 1 spin win outcomes do follow and in win corrective mode there can be sometimes 4 or more in a sequence, and certainly longer 1+2 spin outcome wins sequences as already shown.

Practice, practice, practice and you will gain some feeling for these conditions.

Once again thanks for your contact and it will be necessary to read the MB book ( and corrections where available).

Kind regards

R.