Harsh Sessions won by Positive gambling module

audiokinesis · July 28, 2016, 10:12:19 PM

Hi, regarding to the 13&14th HA sessions:
I did not modify any rules; same way wherewith I solved any other difficult sessions so far. The 13th (longer) session's first 200 spins was the most problematic sequence to my MM approach probably. I applied one strict -300 units Stop Loss. (But I do not know the real adequacy of the exact -300 units Stop Loss yet, without proper and longer testings.)
I think the 13th Harsh session (with 800 spins) is worth the effort for the complete re-do with some more effective MM approach, but for the relevant work - IF it could solve the whole 800 spins, - I need to re-do all of the Harsh + Bad sessions too. Later.

13th session:
354 wins
447 losses
max. bet: 45 units
min.: -383 units (after the -300 units reset)
net bal.: -195 units

14th session:
103 wins
127 losses
max. bet: 15 units
min.: -13 units
net bal.: +11 units
>

Albalaha · July 29, 2016, 03:42:21 AM

Great Job, Audiokinesis @ Janos,
You have been my best student so far and a real hardworking guy. It looks great to see you using different tweaks to better things. You can definitely play better than most members/guests here but you need to polish your skills a bit more. Even I am doing a lot of work to make things as better as possible.
Doing so much varieties of harsh sessions, you learn a lot of skills and graduate to be a sensible player. Anybody winning net profit over all these have positive chances to be ahead in real play.

audiokinesis · July 29, 2016, 10:37:43 PM

Quote from: Albalaha on July 29, 2016, 03:42:21 AM
Great Job, Audiokinesis @ Janos,
You have been my best student so far and a real hardworking guy. It looks great to see you using different tweaks to better things. You can definitely play better than most members/guests here but you need to polish your skills a bit more. Even I am doing a lot of work to make things as better as possible.
Doing so much varieties of harsh sessions, you learn a lot of skills and graduate to be a sensible player. Anybody winning net profit over all these have positive chances to be ahead in real play.

Thanks, yes, tremendous amount of work was in the past 2 years. :thumbs up
I tried the previously used hybrid type cyclic progression (supplemented with flat betting as well) with one different tweak, and it could solved the Beast 13th (770 spins) sequence. Sure, one sample is not sample, so I tried this with the latest 4 HA sessions, from the 11th to 14th. So far so good.

13th session, re-done:
443 losses
337 wins
min.: -79 un.
max. bets: 33 un.
netbalance: 34 un.
>

Albalaha · July 30, 2016, 02:51:42 AM

Good Job again, Janos,
Now check Harsh sessions #1 to 10 too the same way and publish reports with graphs.

Albalaha · July 30, 2016, 05:50:42 AM

15th Harsh Session:
142 Losses vs 120 wins

L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W

Albalaha · August 03, 2016, 05:49:47 AM

16th Harsh Session:

79 Losses vs 64 wins

L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W

Albalaha · August 04, 2016, 07:27:37 AM

Harsh session # 17:
72 Wins vs 92 Losses (very tricky start)

L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W

BEAT-THE-WHEEL · August 11, 2016, 05:59:01 AM

Since Albalaha very sure that streaks of losses, always happened,
then we could bet both ways, since no casino rules, say we can't bet both sides!

Below I see them the WL as baccarat's decision, and forget the "half-payout".

==================

bet , if win, +1,
if lose, -1, play both sides,
=====================
Albalaha's

Session 1:

-1L/[w+1]
-1L/w2
-1L/w3
-1L/w4
-1L/w5
-1L/w6
-1L/w7
-1L/w8
-1L/w9
-1L/1w0
-1L/w11
-1L/w12
-1L/w13
-1L/w14
+1W/L-15
2Lw14
1Lw15
1Lw16
1WL-17
2L/16
1L/17
1L/18
1L/19
1L/20
1L/21
1W/22
2L/21
1L/22
1L/24
1L/25
1L/26
1L/27
1L/28
1L/29
1L/30
1L/31
1L/32
1W/L33
-2L/32
1L/33
1L/34
1W/35
2L/34
1L/35
1L/36
1L/37
1W/38
2L/37
1L/38
1L/39
2W/40
1L/39
1L/40
1W/41
2W/40
3L/39
1L/40
1L/41
1W/42
2L/41
1W/42
1L/41
1L/42
1L/43
1W/44
1L/43
1L/44
1L/45
1L/46
1L/47
1W/48
2L/47
1L/48
1L/49
1L/50
1W/51
2L/50
1L/49
1L/50
1W/51
2L/50
1L/51
1L/52
1W/53
2L/52
1L/53
1W/54
2L/53
1L/54
1L/55
1L/56
1L/57
1W/58
2L/57
1L/58
1L/59
1W/60
2L/59
1L/60
1W/61
2L/60
1W/61
2L/60
1W/61
2L/60
1L/61
1W/62
2L/61
1W/62
2L/61
1L/62
1W/63
2L/
1L/
2W/
1L/
2W/
3W/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
1L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3W/
4L/
3W/
2L/
1L/
1W/
2L/
1L/
1L/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3W/
4L/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1L/
1L/
1L/
1L/
1L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3W/
2L/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2L/
1W/
2L/
1W/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3W/
4L/
3W/
2L/
1L/
1L/
1W/
2W/
3W/
4W/
5L/
4W/
5L/
4W/
5L/
4W/
5W/
6L/
5W/
4L/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3L/
2W/
3W/
4W/
===============
WHAT IF W/L ABOUT THE SAME?

1L/1=0
1L/2=1
1L/3=3
1W/4=0
2W/3=-1
3W/2=-2
4W/1=1
5L/1=-3
4W/2=-1
5L/1=-5
4W/2=-3
5L/1=-7
4W/1=-4
5W/2=-1
6L/1=-6
5W/2=-3
4L/1=-6
3L/1=-8
2W/2=-8
3L/1=-10
2W/2=-10
3L/1=-12
2W/2=-12
3W/1=-10
4W/1=-7

BetJack · August 11, 2016, 11:42:18 AM

Hello Forum Friend

Someone One Time Said me

If you gona Bet Both Sides (R/B or P/B) Better bet The the difference between Two BETS ...

with respect
BETJACK

p.s. example

if we bet both sides 3P/1B
3-1=2units
then we bet on one side 2units on P side

if we bet both sides 1P/3B
1-3=-2
then we bet on one side 2unit on B side

if we get 0. we do not bet.

Blood Angel · August 11, 2016, 03:50:43 PM

Quote from: BetJack on August 11, 2016, 11:42:18 AM
Hello Forum Friend

Someone One Time Said me

If you gona Bet Both Sides (R/B or P/B) Better bet The the difference between Two BETS ...

with respect
BETJACK

p.s. example

if we bet both sides 3P/1B
3-1=2units
then we bet on one side 2units on P side

if we bet both sides 1P/3B
1-3=-2
then we bet on one side 2unit on B side

if we get 0. we do not bet.

It's called Differential Betting.

Albalaha · August 12, 2016, 03:48:54 AM

Quotebet , if win, +1,
if lose, -1, play both sides,

This won't work buddy in a random session. Do not fool yourself by reverse engineering only harsh situations where losses and wins are very unbalanced and differential betting or betting the difference will help. Normally, due to the house edge, each EC bet will hit lesser than what it should, so playing even both may not help.

Remember: trying to predict in a random game is as foolish as going with a fishing rod in Sahara Desert. Either it is not truly random i.e.unpredictable) or we can not predict.

Albalaha · August 12, 2016, 03:54:11 AM

Harsh session #18:
132 Losses vs 106 wins

l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w

Blue_Angel · August 13, 2016, 01:42:40 AM

Quote from: Blood Angel on August 11, 2016, 03:50:43 PM
It's called Differential Betting.

If you did the contra D'Alembert, I mean in positive way, the side with most hits would generate more profit than the loss of the other.
The classic D'Alembert increases by 1 unit after a loss, but the contra increases after a win.
Let's say you had 3 wins in a row 1+2+3=6 you are losing the 4th bet 6-4=+2 and now instead of betting 3 units on next bet, you'd bet 1.
After 1 loss you restart from scratch.

Albalaha · August 27, 2016, 04:06:47 AM

Harsh Session #19: offered by a friend of mine. He said he lost -300 twice in this session and no net profit to finish with

Wins: 449 vs Losses: 522 (positive gambling module beats it and ends positive without any stop loss, not even -200)

W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L

Albalaha · September 06, 2016, 10:43:18 AM

Harsh Session #20:
117 Losses vs 95 wins

L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W