I have cut'n'pasted the following:


Units needed: 8
Numbers played: 20
Minimum profit: 1 unit
Maximum profit: 10 units

1 unit on 0-1-2-3                                                                                  (corner, pays 1 unit profit)
2 units on 31-32-33-34-35-36                                                               (double street, pays 4 units profit)
1 unit on each of the following 5 splits: 8-11, 13-14, 15-18, 17-20, 27-30  (each split gives profit of 10 units)

See how ingeniously chaotic this bet selection is, both on the table, but much more importantly on the (European) wheel.

It favors the Tiers a bit but is nonetheless very well balanced.

The point here is to be chaotic and not evenly distributed.

If you want even distribution just bet Red or Black.

This system is better played with negative type of progression.

[The source:  http://www.roulette30.com/p/kavouras-bet.html]



I wouldn't hold your breath over the last line on the home page: MORE TO COME

I've been patiently waiting over 2 years and it hasn't come yet!!  (Another "Gunna"...I'm gunna do this; gunna do that...The world is full of 'em!!)

I have used it, and found a positive progession is working well.  1 up on a win.  The winnings are  very often in a row. It cover a bit much of the table, which is a cost during a losing streak, so I would not use negative progressions. One up on just the winning chip is to consider as well.

1 unit on 0-1-2-3                                                                                  (corner, pays 1 unit profit)
2 units on 31-32-33-34-35-36                                                               (double street, pays 4 units profit)
1 unit on each of the following 5 splits: 8-11, 13-14, 15-18, 17-20, 27-30  (each split gives profit of 10 units)


It means, we can play this trick, in a variety of ways. We are basically covering 20 numbers with different bets.

Hello,

Thank you Esoito for bringing this up.

KingsRoulette is correct. The underlying idea (one of the underlying ideas anyway) is covering 20 numbers with different bets

I used this for a short time as well and like Ralph used a +1 progression on a win.  Good results but it was costly at times when the numbers went against me.

It s normal to have a lot of wins when you bet 20 numbers.

Quote from: Razor on March 18, 2013, 09:47:02 PM
It s normal to have a lot of wins when you bet 20 numbers.

And normal to lose at rapid rate when it goes against, we never win enough on our streaks.

"""And normal to lose at rapid rate when it goes against, we never win enough on our streaks."""

Exactly.
This bet selection is no better than any other.
Wheel doesn t know the order of the pockets.
So if the bet is on  pockets that are next to each other, or with 1 gap or with 2-3-4-5etc gaps or mixed, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

It s all about how many pockets you cover and what the(unfair) payment on a win is...and this doesn t change.

Quote from: Razor on March 19, 2013, 09:23:01 AM
"""And normal to lose at rapid rate when it goes against, we never win enough on our streaks."""

Exactly.
This bet selection is no better than any other.
Wheel doesn t know the order of the pockets.
So if the bet is on  pockets that are next to each other, or with 1 gap or with 2-3-4-5etc gaps or mixed, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE.

It s all about how many pockets you cover and what the(unfair) payment on a win is...and this doesn t change.

Both works or not. Many methods are "good" because they are so even distributed on the wheel, other because they are a sector.
We know sectors on the wheel behave the same as  the occur on the table.

In order to say that something is working, it mustn t have the part "sometimes it doesn t work"
If it s working it can t lose...

If it can lose, then it s not working.

Quote from: Razor on March 19, 2013, 11:24:25 AM
In order to say that something is working, it mustn t have the part "sometimes it doesn t work"
If it s working it can t lose...

If it can lose, then it s not working.

.
All system lose, still there is gamblers who keep regular profits ...
There is no such thing that a system can not lose ...

Quote from: Sputnik on March 19, 2013, 11:26:56 AM
.
All system lose, still there is gamblers who keep regular profits ...
There is no such thing that a system can not lose ...

If anything which can not lose could be found, the casino games would adopt changing the rules. It is game not free money.

I agree with Ralph.


""" still there is gamblers who keep regular profits ..."""

I don t agree

Quote from: Razor on March 19, 2013, 01:26:08 PM
I agree with Ralph.


""" still there is gamblers who keep regular profits ..."""

I don t agree

Its fine by me