i worked away years ago in beverley in hull..nice place

i,m interested maybe it could clarify something that no one else seems to...be interesting to see if its the same bet another member got at the same time...i look forward to see if its the same bet

i apologise if it came out that way...a system posted can be botted by anyone...and in the community spirit as you say... a lot of people who bought one bot simply can,t afford another just to do one sheet...this is the community spirit in my eyes helping other members find an alternative to this system...


and yes i like advertising stefs bot why wouldn,t i...i love it


but i am sorry to put anyone out....and remember i did pay out of my own money to get it done....

I had nicksmi build this for the bot...also a flat bet version...anyone wanting it should ask him ...maybe a small fee should be charged for the time and effort he put in as he makes them cheaply compared to the time and effort he put in

1.  Roulette  series results[/size]   2.  Roulette  mixed results   3.  Roulette  cross combination results


he actually said to understand them...but they were useless...it was to give you an idea how to think about roulette...re read the  page it was on   

i didn,t realize we were testing any system razor has given?...he hasn,t given one...only an idea one exsist.....plus its our own time and effort given by some of us who likes a challenge..even if it does not exist you learn a lot just by looking...you should try it..after all why are you here?


Has anybody else done anything similar? Or looked at it in a different way to what I have done?  Be specific - what exactly have you examined?

yes some of us are...i,m positive its the group numbers..your looking at it with the same eyes all the time...you need a different perspective...what could the three movements be...could it be 3 separate group numbers ie red odd black odd..red even as an example..what do the actual dozens or dozens and column chase if not the 4 number groups...the formula is based on this i,m sure...there are only so many combinations with 3 individual number groups you can make...now what happens most with these combo groups on the 4th spin?.....that is the key t o the formula...razor looks like he,s giving no more help...so what combination with a doz col...and 2 other bets do you use? to capture or trap what is going to happen on the 4th spin...

remember razor said it can be seen in rx...and gave this as an example...

i think you all need to try the demo version of the bot or free trial none of this works...you sort out this way of betting on the sheet and use the bot settings for the rest...i,ve tried them all...you get a to a certain point on no recovery ..then whoosh off you go downhill

no probs happy to help

is this it?

tomla...i suppose its how many units you are willing to gamble and table limits...this is just as bad as the martingale

i don,t really notice the time frame as i let the bot run...sometimes i,ll watch it on and off for a few hours...and it seems fine...when i leave it running it just goes way way down..lost 1000 bankroll playmoney numerous times...i think Sam can agree on that..i,ve asked stef to implement a feature on his bot where it can switch sheets after so many units won automatically..maybe it,ll hold up better swapping sytems...maybe if i get a bit of time i,ll set the bot with the settings and video it for you...a bit time consuming as busy at the moment...but if i have any system your interested in i,ll set for you to see and watch...sorry about the late reply just noticed your post...just been busy looking at razors thread this week

ok again razor could you give a spin sample with the end profit target?

it only works for so long...how do i know...i try this strategy out all the time on stefs bot on every system i have which is a lot....you can do stuff like this ...any amounts up or down on a loss or win...and reset in new high if you want,,,i,m just saying its only good for so long

hi razor could you give us a 100 spin sample with the profit at the end?...or how many wins or losses...or is this asking too much

there was no increase of bet size during a session...however in any session the betsize may change in size for the session only...but the actual size of the bet remains constant throughout each individual session..that was the criteria for his bet..now i think he said he split his bet into 20 separate bets....and did he mention he sometimes lost 9 bets in a row..but no matter as such is his bet selection he always came out ahead...so if he lost 9 bets out of 20 what odds was he choosing to come out ahead every game...maybe a small loss in 30 sessions...