Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Barron518

#1
Quote from: Kimo Li on August 08, 2019, 03:31:57 AM
Those are for single zero wheel.
Attached spreadsheet is for both European and American wheels.

Thank you Kimo Li.

Sorry for my lack of understanding, can you please tell us how to play this and how to play your quad?

Thank you very much.

#2
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
September 28, 2017, 05:21:32 PM
Thank you Nick for your reply. In your humble opinion, what is the best AP combination to be used? I know that the terrible two's is the nemesis of the VDW not to mention the mutual bets,  but with your knowledge and experience, please let us know the best AP combinations if I may ask.

Cheers!!



Quote from: Nickmsi on September 28, 2017, 05:11:30 PM
Thanks Max,

Hi Barron518,

I have tested all 16 AP's individually and in combination with each other.  The VDW that I am testing now does not
use all the AP's.

Cheers

Nick
#3
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
September 28, 2017, 08:13:28 AM
Thank you, Nick!

Are you testing the full 16 AP VDW combinations?

Cheers!


Quote from: Nickmsi on September 28, 2017, 02:47:55 AM
As promised I have attached an Excel Sheet with our actual Demo Results covering 40,000 spins, (40 Sessions of 1,000 spins each).

The bet selection is one of my VDW for 1 EC.

It was played on the NZ table with BetVoyager.

All bets were 1 unit each.

We had over 30,000 placed bets which is generally acceptable validity.

We won 24 of the 40 sessions (60%).

We showed a small profit of 176 units or .0044/spin.

As you can see, it was indeed a grind. 

If you played this in a Brick and Mortar Casino at an average 200 spins/hands per day, it would take 200 days to get these results.

Next step is to make this system better.

Cheers
Nick
#4
Thank you very much.
#5
Please add me to your list if I may ask. Thank you.

uote author=Stephen Tabone link=topic=8174.msg56730#msg56730 date=1497456085]
6th to enter
[/quote]
#6
Gizmotron / Re: Overcome the Chimp
June 10, 2017, 01:23:41 AM
I am glad to see you back, Gizmotron.


Quote from: Gizmotron on June 09, 2017, 12:08:21 PM
I figured it out. My practice software is different than my charts that I fill out at the casino on index cards while I play. The first thing I write down is the spin number result. It allows me to look down the numbers to see the off topic distractions. That list of spins is not the same in my charting / practice program. The spin result numbers are hidden well in the telemetry and are not as easy to see. I wasn't looking at the dozens sections but being distracted by the list of numbers in my hand written charts. I was just about to quit. I've been charting my real play like this for the past three years.


So next time I go to the casino I will not write down the actual spin numbers. I won't be able to be distracted. It's really that simple. It will only be possible to see the dozens in the chart. That should take care of the focus problem. I almost always win in practice at home. This is done by playing miniature wars to get to three flat bet wins.


Seven times a net 3 equals 21. (21 x 12) units equals 252 units. That's good enough for a day of play. Some times I get to three wins in three spins. Typically I get there in 10 to 15 spins. It's just a matter of catching the streaks.  I was all but quit. Now my practice and real play will be very similar without the same old distractions.