Quote from: GreatGrampa on June 03, 2013, 04:24:39 AM
I dint change anything. Just adapting it to the finales and that too on places it work.  So if you read carefully you can see that I am using it only for finales that appeared at least once to become more than once.  The adaptation provides following advantages.  Simplicity.  More playing opportunities.  With respect to profit I can't say either way as I have had mixed results.  You should try out yourselves to see how it compares as the original system is complex and different people has their own of doing it. 

Thank you for reply. I have figured out that your system is used only for betting 1 and >1, unless for that exception. I was first skeptical because it triggers bet too fast, unlike mr. winkels way where it takes about 25 spins, but I will give it another shot and try to implement some recovery. It surely is brilliant observation.
Thank you again

Quote from: VLS on June 02, 2013, 09:48:30 PM
Hello blup, welcome to the forum.

You might want to try: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?action=profile;u=209

Last post as of this writing being: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3491.msg112448#msg112448

On May 22, 2013, 05:03:16 AM

Cheers!

Thank you Vic, that's the forum where I get familiarized with GUT and mr. Winkel

Hello mr. greatgrampa, have few questions.
Did you change mr. Winkel's system only for simplicity, or does it get more profit?
Can you play both versions on RNG, or only live?
Do you use progression? In your version after 4 losses and in mr. winkles after 2 losses, next win won't get you into positive, unless you double beting units.
And do you know is mr Winkel still active on this or some other forum?


Thank you in advance for sharing your systems and experience.