Quote from: Stephen Tabone on June 10, 2017, 06:00:45 PM
By the way to anyone who does not believe in systems, (not that all of them work) 1. we are living in a solar system
Don't forget the school system!!
[attachimg=1]
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
#1
General Discussion / Re: 20 years 50/50 baccarat research resulted in 2 books in top #7
June 11, 2017, 08:24:05 AMDon't forget the school system!!
[attachimg=1]
#2
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
June 04, 2016, 06:34:51 PM
24 more shoes to add to the testing ....
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
w
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
w
w
------ +5
x
x
w
w
w
w
------ +2
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
x
w
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
x
w
x
x
w
w
------ +0
x
w
w
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +4
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
w
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
w
w
------ +5
x
x
w
w
w
w
------ +2
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
x
w
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
x
w
x
x
w
w
------ +0
x
w
w
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +4
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
#3
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
June 02, 2016, 10:46:18 PMQuote from: plolp on June 02, 2016, 06:54:21 PM
@ Big Ez
Can you show how you doing with that?
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
1 random .org
Thanks
There are 49 outcomes here. I have been testing in blocks of 60, because I can count on 60 playable hands in a bacc shoe. But for your results I get the following W/L string.
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
#4
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
June 02, 2016, 12:15:26 PM
Here is another set of shoes I tested, 25 more for a total of 40 shoes.
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
------ +4
w
x
x
w
w
------ +1
w
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +4
w
w
x
w
w
x
------ +2
w
w
w
------ +3
w
x
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +6
w
w
w
w
x
w
x
w
------ +4
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
x
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
x
x
w
w
w
------ +2
x
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
w
x
x
x
w
w
------ +0
x
w
w
x
w
------ +1
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
------ +4
w
x
x
w
w
------ +1
w
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +4
w
w
x
w
w
x
------ +2
w
w
w
------ +3
w
x
w
x
w
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +6
w
w
w
w
x
w
x
w
------ +4
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
x
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
x
x
w
w
w
------ +2
x
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
w
x
x
x
w
w
------ +0
x
w
w
x
w
------ +1
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
x
w
w
w
w
------ +3
w
w
w
x
w
------ +3
#5
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
June 01, 2016, 11:01:13 PMQuote from: from100 on June 01, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
Thanks Big!
You must do something very different from us, as how can you get so many wins in 9 spins?!
Or there is something that I don't get?
Can you post some examples of your play?
I didn't explain well enough. I posted 15 different shoes, and the W/L for each shoe with the number of units won after each of the shoes
#6
Roulette Forum / Re: Use Math to beat Roulette/Baccarat
June 01, 2016, 11:37:29 AM
VDW applied to my 15 most recent baccarat shoes
w
w
w
x
w
w
----- +4
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
x
w
w
w
------ +3
w
x
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +7
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +6
w
x
w
w
w
------ +3
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
x
x
w
x
x
w
------ -2
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +0
More testing to come.....
w
w
w
x
w
w
----- +4
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
x
w
w
x
w
------ +2
w
w
w
w
w
x
w
------ +5
w
x
w
w
w
------ +3
w
x
x
x
w
x
w
------ -1
w
w
x
w
w
------ +3
w
w
x
x
w
------ +1
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +7
w
w
w
w
w
w
------ +6
w
x
w
w
w
------ +3
w
w
w
w
w
------ +5
x
x
w
x
x
w
------ -2
x
w
w
w
w
w
------ +4
w
x
w
x
x
w
------ +0
More testing to come.....
#7
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
May 22, 2016, 11:56:27 AM
Taking this sequence as P/B I get +28 
#8
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Ever thought of any long term progression?
March 19, 2016, 01:22:12 PMQuote from: soxfan on March 19, 2016, 04:38:54 AM
Sorry, I promised the old Armenian cat that I wouldn't divulge the beans and reveal the specific of his play. So, I can only speak generally, hey hey.
Can you speak about the progression and not the specific style of play
#9
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
March 04, 2016, 02:13:18 AM
Here is a test I did of 1k placed bets with BLUES progression.
Highest bet was 16 units, and I ended with +83 units
I have attached:
the 3k random.org file I used for generating my W/L registry
1k flat bet graph played through this random.org sequence
1k bet graph with BA progression
sheet with the W/L and bet amounts for each bet
edit****
Forgot to add this is in cycles of 50 based off playing baccarat
Highest bet was 16 units, and I ended with +83 units
I have attached:
the 3k random.org file I used for generating my W/L registry
1k flat bet graph played through this random.org sequence
1k bet graph with BA progression
sheet with the W/L and bet amounts for each bet
edit****
Forgot to add this is in cycles of 50 based off playing baccarat
#10
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
March 03, 2016, 07:57:07 PMQuote from: Nickmsi on March 03, 2016, 04:58:36 PM
Hi Big EZ . .
I tested this just like you said.
On a new high (peak) I reset the progression to 1.
The Bet Selection remains the same, only the progression changes.
Cheers
Nick
Just to be clear, you start a new cycle of 37 bets?
Because in the examples that Blue posted when he resets anywhere in the 37 bet cycle he plays out the remaining cycle for 1 unit .
Can you clear this up for me/us Blue, just to make sure the testing is being done the right way
Quote from: Blue_Angel on February 23, 2016, 01:06:50 AM
BETTING ALWAYS ON RED / FRENCH ROULETTE WITH "LE PARTAGE" RULE
S=Spin R=Result T=Total
S R T
1 -1 -1
2 -1 -2
3x +1 -1
4 -1 -2
5x +1 -1
6 -1 -2
7x +1 -1
8 -1 -2
9 -1 -3
10x +1 -2
11 -1 -3
12x +1 -2
13 -1 -3
14/ZERO -0.5 -3.5
15 -1 -4.5
16x +1 -3.5
17 -1 -4.5
18 -1 -5.5
19 -1 -6.5
20 -1 -7.5
21x +1 -6.5
22 -1 -7.5
23x +1 -6.5
24 -1 -7.5
25 -1 -8.5
26 -1 -9.5
27 -1 -10.5
28 -1 -11.5
29x +1 -10.5
30 -1 -11.5
31x +1 -10.5
32x +1 -9.5
33 -1 -10.5
34 -1 -11.5
35x +1 -10.5
36x +1 -9.5
37x +1 -8.5
38x +2 -6.5 BET RAISES TO 2 UNITS
39 -2 -8.5
40 -2 -10.5
41 -2 -12.5
42x +2 -10.5
43 -2 -12.5
44 -2 -14.5
45x +2 -12.5
46x +2 -10.5
47 -2 -12.5
48 -2 -14.5
49 -2 -16.5
50 -2 -18.5
51 -2 -20.5
52x +2 -18.5
53 -2 -20.5
54 -2 -22.5
55x +2 -20.5
56 -2 -22.5
57 -2 -24.5
58x +2 -22.5
59 -2 -24.5
60 -2 -26.5
61 -2 -28.5
62x +2 -26.5
63 -2 -28.5
64 -2 -30.5
65x +2 -28.5
66 -2 -30.5
67 -2 -32.5
68x +2 -30.5
69x +2 -28.5
70 -2 -30.5
71x +2 -28.5
72 -2 -30.5
73 -2 -32.5
74 -2 -34.5
75x +4 -30.5 BET RAISES TO 4 UNITS
76 -4 -34.5
77x +4 -30.5
78 -4 -34.5
79 -4 -38.5
80x +4 -34.5
81 -4 -38.5
82 -4 -42.5
83 -4 -46.5
84 -4 -50.5
85 -4 -52.5
86 -4 -56.5
87 -4 -60.5
88 -4 -64.5
89 -4 -68.5
90x +4 -64.5
91 -4 -68.5
92x +4 -64.5
93 -4 -68.5
94 -4 -72.5
95x +4 -68.5
96 -4 -72.5
97x +4 -68.5
98 -4 -72.5
99 -4 -76.5
100 -4 -80.5
101x +4 -76.5
102x +4 -72.5
103 -4 -76.5
104x +4 -72.5
105/ZERO -2 -74.5
106 -4 -78.5
107 -4 -82.5
108 -4 -86.5
109 -4 -90.5
110 -4 -94.5
111 -4 -98.5
112 -8 -106.5 BET RAISES TO 8 UNITS
113 -8 -114.5
114x +8 -106.5
115 -8 -114.5
116 -8 -122.5
117x +8 -114.5
118 -8 -122.5
119x +8 -114.5
120 -8 -122.5
121 -8 -130.5
122x +8 -122.5
123 -8 -130.5
124 -8 -138.5
125 -8 -146.5
126 -8 -154.5
127 -8 -162.5
128x +8 -154.5
129x +8 -146.5
130x +8 -138.5
131x +8 -130.5
132 -8 -138.5
133 -8 -146.5
134x +8 -138.5
135 -8 -146.5
136 -8 -154.5
137 -8 -162.5
138x +8 -154.5
139 -8 -162.5
140x +8 -154.5
141 -8 -162.5
142 -8 -170.5
143x +8 -162.5
144 -8 -170.5
145x +8 -162.5
146x +8 -154.5
147x +8 -146.5
148 -8 -154.5
149x +16 -138.5 BET RAISES TO 16 UNITS
150x +16 -122.5
151 -16 -138.5
152 -16 -154.5
153/ZERO -8 -162.5
154x +16 -146.5
155x +16 -130.5
156 -16 -146.5
157 -16 -162.5
158x +16 -146.5
159 -16 -162.5
160 -16 -178.5
161 -16 -194.5
162 -16 -210.5
163x +16 -194.5
164x +16 -178.5
165 -16 -194.5
166 -16 -210.5
167 -16 -226.5
168x +16 -210.5
169 -16 -226.5
170 -16 -242.5
171x +16 -226.5
172x +16 -210.5
173 -16 -226.5
174x +16 -210.5
175x +16 -194.5
176 -16 -210.5
177 -16 -226.5
178 -16 -242.5
179 -16 -258.5
180x +16 -242.5
181 -16 -258.5
182 -16 -274.5
183 -16 -290.5
184x +16 -274.5
185 -16 -290.5
186/ZERO -16 -306.5 BET RAISES TO 32 UNITS
187x +32 -274.5
188 -32 -306.5
189 -32 -338.5
190/ZERO -16 -354.5
191 -32 -386.5
192x +32 -354.5
193x +32 -322.5
194 -32 -354.5
195 -32 -386.5
196x +32 -354.5
197 -32 -386.5
198 -32 -418.5
199/ZERO -16 -434.5
200 -32 -466.5
201 10 -32 -498.5
202 6 -32 -530.5
203 14 +32 -498.5
204 21 +32 -466.5
205 30 +32 -434.5
206 11 -32 -466.5
207 12 +32 -434.5
208 10 -32 -466.5
209 22 -32 -498.5
210 34 +32 -466.5
211 10 -32 -498.5
212 16 +32 -466.5
213 0 -16 -482.5
214 14 +32 -450.5
215 8 -32 -482.5
216 34 +32 -450.5
217 18 +32 -418.5
218 19 +32 -386.5
219 25 +32 -354.5
220 35 -32 -386.5
221 34 +32 -354.5
222 29 -32 -386.5
223 16 +64 -322.5 BET RAISES TO 64 UNITS
224 21 +64 -258.5
225 12 +64 -194.5
226 30 +64 -130.5
227 9 +64 -66.5
228 34 +64 -2.5
229 32 +64 +61.5 BET RESETS TO 1 UNIT
230 15 -1 +60.5
231 0 -0.5 +60
232 17 -1 +59
233 2 -1 +58
234 3 +1 +59
235 0 -0.5 +58.5
236 1 +1 +59.5
237 36 +1 +60.5
238 22 -1 +59.5
239 34 +1 +60.5
240 11 -1 +59.5
241 20 -1 +58.5
242 1 +1 +59.5
243 28 -1 +58.5
244 11 -1 +57.5
245 21 +1 +58.5
246 29 -1 +57.5
247 15 -1 +56.5
248 15 -1 +55.5
249 34 +1 +56.5
250 10 -1 +55.5
251 16 +1 +56.5
252 4 -1 +55.5
253 35 -1 +54.5
254 17 -1 +53.5
255 4 -1 +52.5
256 19 +1 +53.5
257 25 +1 +54.5
258 11 -1 +53.5
259 0 -0.5 +53
260 5 +2 +55 BET RAISES TO 2 UNITS
261 22 -2 +53
262 31 -2 +51
263 0 -1 +50
264 2 -2 +48
265 10 -2 +46
266 6 -2 +44
267 28 -2 +42
268 27 +2 +44
269 4 -2 +42
270 1 +2 +44
271 3 +2 +46
272 11 -2 +44
273 11 -2 +42
274 9 +2 +44
275 5 +2 +46
276 1 +2 +48
277 19 +2 +50
278 11 -2 +48
279 28 -2 +46
280 10 -2 +44
281 15 -2 +42
282 27 +2 +44
283 23 +2 +46
284 13 -2 +44
285 7 +2 +46
286 17 -2 +44
287 35 -2 +42
288 27 +2 +44
289 14 +2 +46
290 21 +2 +48
291 14 +2 +50
292 34 +2 +52
293 11 -2 +50
294 10 -2 +48
295 36 +2 +50
296 24 -2 +48
297 36 +4 +52 BET RAISES TO 4 UNITS
298 34 +4 +56
299 7 +4 +60
300 5 +4 +64
301 6 -1 +63 BET RESETS TO 1 UNIT
302 16 +1 +64
303 34 +1 +65
304 34 +1 +66
305 33 -1 +65
306 26 -1 +64
307 1 +1 +65
308 5 +1 +66
309 0 -0.5 +65.5
310 33 -1 +64.5
311 0 -0.5 +64
312 9 +1 +65
313 0 -0.5 +64.5
314 21 +1 +65.5
315 23 +1 +66.5
316 13 -1 +65.5
317 3 +1 +66.5
318 20 -1 +65.5
319 34 +1 +66.5
320 28 -1 +65.5
321 28 -1 +64.5
322 14 +1 +65.5
323 20 -1 +64.5
324 30 +1 +65.5
325 25 +1 +66.5
326 36 +1 +67.5
327 1 +1 +68.5
328 31 -1 +67.5
329 35 -1 +66.5
330 36 +1 +67.5
331 5 +1 +68.5
332 29 -1 +67.5
333 28 -1 +66.5
Summary}
6 cycles of 37 spins / 333 outcomes / +66.5 units total / highest balance +68.5 units/
lowest balance -530.5 units / highest bet 64 units
#11
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
March 03, 2016, 04:51:54 PM
I have a question about this progression before I start to test it against my W/L records.
Is it always in cycles of 37? What happens if you sit down and start off with a win, do you lock up the
1 unit of profit and start a fresh cycle of 37? What if you are 15 bets in and gain 1 unit, do you lock that up and start a new cycle of 37 or is all 1 unit betting played out until the end of a 37 cycle?
Is it always in cycles of 37? What happens if you sit down and start off with a win, do you lock up the
1 unit of profit and start a fresh cycle of 37? What if you are 15 bets in and gain 1 unit, do you lock that up and start a new cycle of 37 or is all 1 unit betting played out until the end of a 37 cycle?
#12
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
February 29, 2016, 08:33:01 PMQuote from: Blue_Angel on February 24, 2016, 02:05:36 AM
Yes.
About card games such as Baccarat, multiply 6 decks by 52 cards and deduct from the total 25% OR multiply 8 decks by 52 cards and deduct from the total 33%
234 to 278 are the playable cards for each shoe, if we consider 5 cards as the average for each result we arrive to:
234 + 278 = 512 / 2 = 256 / 5 = 51 hands per shoe approximately.
We could round it up to 50 hands/results as 1 cycle.
So based on this I have another silly question....
If I/you/anyone use the same bet selection on both roulette even chances and baccarat, for one game I would need to adjust it after 37 spins and the other 50 even though its the same selection process?
And for baccarat does that formula take into account that you are going to be losing units for the banker commission? This progression applied to baccarat could be losing significant units during betting 16units per 50 hand sequence, or am I looking at this the wrong way?
#13
General Discussion / Re: P.A :PREACHING about HG!
February 29, 2016, 12:45:15 AMQuote from: Blue_Angel on February 28, 2016, 09:21:01 PM
Sorry but I don't wish to share it.
1) Just find the minimum possible occurrences for your bet selection within a total of results.
2) Then try to calculate a progression which is not been affected by which turn are going to occur the wins and losses and also the bankroll and max bet to be reasonable and not too high.
This is an extreme question, but.....
Will your 30shows in 111spins single dozen progression come out ahead if the single dozen you are betting only starts to show at spin 81? Meaning you only get your 30 shows in the last 30 spins.
#14
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
February 24, 2016, 08:50:37 PMQuote from: Blue_Angel on February 24, 2016, 02:05:36 AM
Yes.
About card games such as Baccarat, multiply 6 decks by 52 cards and deduct from the total 25% OR multiply 8 decks by 52 cards and deduct from the total 33%
234 to 278 are the playable cards for each shoe, if we consider 5 cards as the average for each result we arrive to:
234 + 278 = 512 / 2 = 256 / 5 = 51 hands per shoe approximately.
We could round it up to 50 hands/results as 1 cycle.
Thanks for that info.....
This may sound like a silly question, but is a cycle only considered a cycle on placed bets?
#15
Albalaha's Exclusive / Re: Anybody think such bad streak can be won?
February 23, 2016, 10:57:09 PM
Blue Angel....
Would the cycle of bets that you are using here for roulette (37) be different if this was american wheel, would it then be cycle of 38? And what if this is applied to baccarat, what's the cycle number then?
Would the cycle of bets that you are using here for roulette (37) be different if this was american wheel, would it then be cycle of 38? And what if this is applied to baccarat, what's the cycle number then?