Does not look llke you are guessing  . I followed yesterday and had few go's, some of the results impressed as it was against bookie's options. I like your idea of double bets as the odds are doubled in stead of going Y,Y you go Y x Y. I think that this can definately be used if the result keep at this level. You have surely checked some previous days/weeks. Can you give an idea of what is was?

I also have another few questions. Is it wise to have the same system for say UK Premier League and Romania 3rd League? Do you account for weather-conditions? Do you work on player stats or team stats or both?

Oh man Semen Padang just scored their second so I AM A WINNERRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok let us check this out. Seems interesting to say the least.

@ albalaha


I am not talking about fairness in RNG, I am talking about distribution in RNG the Zumma numbers is only 15000, and then it ends, if could extend that run to 50 000, I bet that the situation would look a little different.


@ flat_in_o


True


@ turner


The wheel is still round, the wheel still comes in play with several bets, my question would be, why NOT look at it?

@ wannawin


MBB has clarified the calculation.


@ MBB


The same, as I explained, a repeat will be 0, next door clockwise,1 and next door anti-clockwise, 35.


@ albalaha


Perhaps we need a little voodoo, nothing else seems to work. And bud, please your reply was not rough, and even if it was, I don't really care. I want to use the forum to get other input on my ideas, no matter if what my ideas seem like.


@ MrJ


There is really nothing to say.




Maybe I should have asked this question first.


How do we know a good RNG from a bad one?


The two most important parts of the answer to me is.


1. The must be no underlying pattern.
2. Over x spins the numbers will have a very equal distribution.


One thing that I have noticed in the 9 hours I have studied Roulette is that systems that is too mechanical gets busted first. This type of bet selection will not be 100% mechanical and the betting method can be changed at will according to what testing data shows.


Like I said before, I have an idea, and wanted some input.

The quest of all Roulette players is to try any find in which pocket the ball will end up.

[Moderator's Comment: Please avoid swearing on the forum! Let the little white ball remain white...and not red. LOL  Thank you.]

So lets'd try this. I will try and explain it as well as possible, as to avoid confusion, but please ask if anything is unclear.


1. We measure the Zscore of the movement per spin in the same way as we would measure the Zscore of numbers 0-36, ie if the last 2 numbers spun is 0 and 32, and we measure the movement clockwise, it will be 1. If the last three numbers spun is, 0,32,0 the measurement will be 1,36. If the last four numbers spun is 0,32,0,17 the measurement will be 1,36,8.


2. After 74 or 111 spins(I am thinking 111, as that is 3 stat cycles) we look at the lowest 10 Zscores for  pockets 0-36, 0 being a repeat, 1 being a next door to the right and 36 being a next door to the left.


3. We then measure the Zscore for each number and after 111 spins, we look at the 10 numbers with the lowest Zscores. If one of these numbers coincide with one of the lowest Pockets we play it. By play I mean we play the number, all of its streets, all of its corners, and all of its splits with min progression until  we are in profit.


Ideas?