Hi Dane
No worries.  Had some wins and loses too. But the things you can see when watching this system opens up a lot of new doors to the game  like repeating elements etc so all good.
Regards Mick.

Quote from: esoito on December 10, 2013, 10:39:46 PM
In an effort to get us all singing from the same page here are some semantic thoughts regarding the phrases Beating Roulette and Winning At Roulette

Beating Roulette
Play continuously and you can't beat roulette -- roulette will beat you. The edge is set in cement.


Winning At Roulette
Quite a different kettle of fish altogether, otherwise those claiming to be professional roulette players, for example, would not exist, and nobody would ever be in the black.

Three essential ingredients:

1 Clearly defined triggers

2  Clearly defined betting strategy (flat...progressive...stoploss...whatever)

3  Clearly defined exit point (set by the stoploss...or a defined target...or after a certain number of wins/losses...whatever)

So one is doable; the other is not.

I could not agree more, winning is winning.
If my start balance is 100 and I double it using these steps I will be foolish not to take my 1st 100 out. Then continue to play with the 2nd trying to do the same again. This will at least allow me to keep my original investment and attempt to make profit with the casinos money. If this should fail then at least I have my investment to start again.

Hi everyone my name is Mick
I am new here and vote yes as well.
I think all systems will work at some point but the good systems should work more often and for longer periods of play. For example to bet on a single then cover the single with side bets that win small amounts until the single lands will be better than to just bet on even chance bets

Quote from: Dane on March 13, 2014, 08:10:04 AM
With my new system I seem to end approx. 60% of all sessions with a hit (flat betting Straight Up).
I use a pen and a piece of paper with 12x3 Squares or Spaces reserved for the coming numbers of the three columns.  EACH SESSION ENDS WHEN AT LEAST THREE NUMBERS NEXT TO EACH OTHER IN ANY COLUMN HAVE TURNED UP. For example 1-4-7, 20-23-26-29 or 24-27-30.
I have placed my deadline right after the 120TH spin. And so far I have been able to finish FIVE SESSIONS within 120 spins.

I asked myself how at least three adjacent numbers in any column come. Did 1-4-7 come with 4 filling the gab between 1 and 7?
Or did TWO adjacent numbers there meet one more adjacent numbers in the column?
I then discovered that six times out of ten EXACTLY two adjacent numbers meet exactly one more number.
SO I GET A HIT WHEN EXACTLY THREE ADJACENT NUMBERS IN ANY COLUMN IS A RESULT OF TWO ADJACENT NUMBERS PLUS ONE (not as a result of two isolated numbers being united).
So: If 1 and 4 have come (but not 10) I bet 7.
      If 20 and 23 have come (but not 14 and 29 I bet 17 and 26.
And so forth and so on.
Here is one session:
11
9
24
25
16
1
1
3
30
1
16
7
21...Start betting 18.
12...Add 15 to your betting.
26
15...End of session. See EXACTLY thre numbers Next to each other in the 3RD column: 9-12-15.

The lists (Permanenzen) from SPIELBANK WIESBADEN, year 2011, table 3, are available on the net.
I always start a visit with the first spin of the day. And each day with spins gives me five sessions.
Right after the 41ST day: 681 units won.
Right after the 46TH day: 422 units.
The profit dropping 259 units should not surprise any experienced player.

Right after the 76TH day: 878 units (new record in this test series). The first 76 days of 2011 with five sessions per day: 380 sessions.
878/380 = 2.31.
Good luck!
    Dane

Hi I am Mick and am new here. This is an interesting observation Dane thanks I must try myself.