Hey, here's a thought. Why don't you just sell the forum to alrelax?

That way you get to jump off the flailing ship and he gets to bail out water until it sinks?

Alrelax, congratulations on your new forum ownership. I sincerely wish you every success with the venture, and hope it all works out well for you, for Victor, the forum, and it's members.

Gizmotron, I like reading you charts.

Working with the ECs's I see a black dominance early, but then red takes most of that back. Evens does take over but black is strong too so only a few spins to take profit from an even dominance. From there a little choppy, but red takes a good hold in the second half of the spin file to ensure a positive result.

Leastways that's how I read it, or would have played it.

Thanks for bailing me Al, but now that I'm out I really need to go bush for a while, you know, walkabout.

Cheers.

Blue_Angel >>> To pay in order to see how one could be lucky?!
I've yet to see skills which are enabling luck when you need it, but I've heard about horse-shoe, rabbit foot and bat's bone as lucky charms, you might even combine them all together for even greater results.
On another forum there was someone who was claiming that he was a teacher of Martingale progression...go figure!


I for one would pay a pretty penny to master the art of being lucky. However, giving one's power away to rabbit feet, bat bones, lucky charms, and the like is not conducive to the goal. Luck is merely a word that poorly describes an uncommon, even unfathomable skill.

Sometimes lots of things work really well, and then sometimes they don't. The opposite is also true.

Gizmotron seems to focus and engage his free spirited play on this premise. I really don't see why that's so hard for people to accept.

Whoever else has an interest in playing the game this way might very well pay for some form of tuition to do so.

I'm fine with that, why aren't you?

Gizmo, when you opened your school, how much money in total did you earn from your students?

Let me put forward some perspective before you answer. A little while back I bought ten toy marbles form an auction house for $40. That's right, ten. I sold those ten toy marbles on ebay for $12,000.

What's my point? Give me a break, who should really care if some of us guys make a bit of dough from our expertise, whatever that may be?

Somebody, quite a few somebodies really wanted my marbles, so they paid the price.

Not knowing what it is that you are applying to the 3.6.9, once it does go through the program you've yet to write, would it be possible to also test other number groups for comparison? Initially 2.5.8, and 1.4.7, and for a complete study, every 3 number combination from 1 through 9?

It would be very interesting to see if the grouping 3.6.9 outperformed all other groupings.

Quote from: VLS on October 15, 2017, 07:40:24 AM
It's okay GG, it was agreed by two consenting adults so no harm

Yes I understand you both agreed to this arrangement, but now he's publicly complaining about it not being done.

My point of view is if he had paid the proper amount in the first place maybe it would be done.

Cheers.

Hello Blue_Angel.

I just skimmed over your first system link,

1) http://betselection.cc/blueangel's-mindsphere/numbers-pockets-and-time/


To be honest if I were contracted to code just this system for you I can see in the first instance at least several hours of reading and comprehending (that exhausts your $75). This would be followed by numerous correspondences, that due to time constraints could takes a number of days and many further shadow hours.


At a reasonable hourly rate, we would already be approaching multiple hundreds of dollars in payment for my time committed, and that's before I have even set down the first line of code.


The coding itself could take days and days and days, and the bugs would be thick on the ground which would require more correspondence and more time and more coding, etc.


At this point we would be WELL over $400 and NOWHERE near a completed product for just your first system.


Now here's the rub. You say you paid $75 to Victor to have 3 systems coded! I suggest to you that Victor was well aware of everything I have written above before taking on the job, and so could never possibly deliver on the contract for said amount.

If you seriously wanted Vic to code these up for you then you should have at least added a zero on the end of your $75. But for whatever reason, forum history shows that Vic's long standing record for delivering on promises is abysmal, so you probably dodged a bullet there.

Victor should not have taken such a token amount for such a mammoth task, and you should not have offered such a pittance to possibly earn a king's ransom.

In summary, you both deserve this outcome and each other.

This is all just my educated opinion of course, and nothing personal intended.


Whether the forum soon closes or not is beyond me.
 

I don't believe there is anything unusual about low levels of participation rates for forums in general.

But add to that the probability that you Esoito have single handedly scared many, many posters away with your overzealous moderation, and you have a situation where you (the forum) must lie in the bed you have made.

Just my opinion, of course.

Quote from: Albalaha on August 03, 2017, 03:28:37 AM
By the way, which maths book said that bet selection or progression can not beat this game?

Pretty much all of them. 

My knowledge of roulette lends me to agree system players should keep the bet selection reasonably simple and add more complexity to the staking plan rather than the other way around.

Quote from: ozon on July 29, 2017, 10:08:27 PM
... and you have to play each spin.

Can you explain why you have to play each spin, or why it is a disadvantage to miss some spins?

Thank you Falkor2k15,

I do struggle to understand much of what you post, but enjoy making the effort to do same.

Good for some, not so good for others.

Even so, welcome back esoito.