Hi AsymBacGuy.
re: "...Overall we could accept the idea that asym=sym, yet we should be more interested about how many sym events will shift into asym events or vice versa and, more importantly, at which level of asymmetry or symmetry. Per every shoe played. ..."
Qs: Lets say you have tracked intra-shoe streams of info and concluded the next "spot" is a + bet. So you have concluded the current Sym patterns will change to Asym.
So my Q is do you give more credibility to a "spot" if that very next potentially winning spot would be in row one (per tote board layout) vs lets say that spot would be at say row four or six, eight, or whatever Non-One row,..etc. ??
Thx as always,
re: "...Overall we could accept the idea that asym=sym, yet we should be more interested about how many sym events will shift into asym events or vice versa and, more importantly, at which level of asymmetry or symmetry. Per every shoe played. ..."
Qs: Lets say you have tracked intra-shoe streams of info and concluded the next "spot" is a + bet. So you have concluded the current Sym patterns will change to Asym.
So my Q is do you give more credibility to a "spot" if that very next potentially winning spot would be in row one (per tote board layout) vs lets say that spot would be at say row four or six, eight, or whatever Non-One row,..etc. ??
Thx as always,