BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Sputnik

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 84 Next
1
Baccarat Forum / Re: Hit & Run
« on: Yesterday at 10:31:12 am »
This is the Sputnik's March Delux.
There is three no more or less.

Then we can call them three waves, events, elements, sequences.
One sequence/event is where you have one isolated single between two series.

BBB P BB or PP B PPPP

The second sequence/event is where you have two series after each other.

PPP BB or BBB PPP

The thirs sequence/event is where you have two singles or more after each other.

B P B P or P B P

Now if one sequence repeats you have a double.
Each sequence/event has a 33% chance to show.
And you can cover two with 66% with two attempts, win or break even.

That is the selection.

Reversal is something else, when you reach -2 units and doesn't win or break even.
Then you have 83% chance to get back to zero, break even, one reversal.

I test two different selections and end up with good results.
This can be random fluctuation and luck.
So is up to you to do the same.

I start Roulette Extreme and begin a session.
If I win I stop and start a new session.
Same if I break even.

This way you simulate your personal permanence.
Hit & Run.

Here is a short sample from random org today. One shoe +7 units flat betting.
But I would not play this way on a rolling basis, win and change table.
Then the bad sequence has to catch up with you and not the other way around.
So this example is only for illustration.


2
1
2
2
1
1 W +1
1
1
2
1 W +1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2 W +1
2
2
1
2 W +1
1
1
2
2 W +1
1
2 W +1
2
2
2
1
2 L -1
2 L -2
1
1
2
1 W -1
2
1
1
2
2 W +0
1
2 W +1
1
2
2
1
2 L -1
1 L -2
1
2
2
1
2 W -1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2 L -2
2 W -1
1
2 L -2
2 L -3
1
2
1
2
2
1
1 W -2
2
2 L -3
2
1
2 W -2
2
1
1 W -1
2
1 W +0
1

2
Baccarat Forum / Re: Hit & Run
« on: March 21, 2019, 04:54:30 pm »

One other way to use Sputnik's march is to play against bias sequence to develop.
Then you have 66% to win or break even.

Again I like the idea to stop after one reversal as you get 83% of them.
The last test gave me two losing sessions with -8 units and 98 sessions that won or break even.

The main idea comes from one topic talking about the Johnson Progression where one member state that you will get less variance where the selection is tilted in your favour.
In this case, you would play against one event/sequence to repeat twice or more.

You can compare the situation to dozens on a roulette table.
Each time you get a new dozen to hit you win and each time a dozen repeat you lose.
Only convert that into 1/3 principal using sequential betting.

Cheers

3
Baccarat Forum / Re: Hit & Run
« on: March 21, 2019, 03:24:18 pm »

 That's correct - I also notice some difference with theory and real play.
 Even one famous legend says the same thing - Playing the game change the game.

 Cheers

4
Baccarat Forum / Re: Hit & Run
« on: March 16, 2019, 10:14:10 am »

There is no selection that he uses, but I test one among others and they all should have the same results.

Cheers

5
Baccarat Forum / Re: Hit & Run
« on: March 15, 2019, 03:16:02 pm »

 I use Philip Koetsch book as a reference when testing to compare results.
 If I am not hovering around +10 units and -8 units overall I know I have something.
 But we all know that all selections should have an equal chance, that is why Philip Koetsch results apply to anything you test.

 Cheers

6
Baccarat Forum / Hit & Run
« on: March 14, 2019, 08:42:17 pm »

I have a book that says that average loss is -8 units flat betting for 60.000 trails.
Around 83% include at least one reversal.

Test one selection and won 99 sessions out of 100.


Won +60
Lose -8
break even 39


Cheers

7
Baccarat Forum / Re: Sputnik's March
« on: March 13, 2019, 07:18:27 pm »
 I take small steps in the right direction with Sputnik's March.
 Now two losses or less is the threshold.

 I will explain the following observations so you understand when and where and why to bet.
 This is the sections and turning points.

 When you see one sequence starts with two singles or more you skip that sequence as non-playable.
 Let me list them one by one.

a) Singles and series of two is one entering point that results in two losses if it fails to become bias.
b) Singles and series of three or higher is one entering point that results in two losses if it fails to become bias.
c) Series of two and one single is one entering point that results in two losses if it fails to become bias.
d) Series of three or higher and one single is one entering point that results in two loses if it fails to become bias.
e) Series of two and a series of three or higher is one entering point that results in two loses if it fails to become bias.
f) Series of three and higher and series of two is one entering point that results in two loses if it fails to become bias.

When you see singles and any kind of series you follow both with two bets to cover both situations to repeat once more and avoid triplet (one of each) following the principal of 1/3.

W LW W W W LW W LW W LW LW LW W W W LW W LL LW W W LL W

Today's random org file.

1
1
2
2
1 W
1
1

2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1

2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2 L
2 W
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1

2
2
1
2
1 W
2
1
1
2
2
1
1

2
2
2
2
1
2
1 W
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1

2
2
1
1
2 W
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1

2
2
2
2
1
1
2 L
2 W
1
1
1
2
2
2
2

1
2
2
2
1
  W
2
2
1
2
2 L
1 W

2
2
2
1
2
1 W

2
2
1
2
2 L
1 W
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2 L
2 W
2
1
1
1

2
2
1
2
2 L
1 W
1
2
1
2
1
1

2
2
2
1
1
1 W
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2

1
1
2
2
1 W
1
2
2
1
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2 W
2
2
1

2
2
1
1
1 L
1
1
1
2
2 W
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1

2
1
1
1
2
1 W
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2

1
1
2
1
1 L
1 L
1
1
1

2
2
2
1
2
2 L
2 W
1
2

1
1
2
1
  W
2
2
2
2
1
1
1 W
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1

2
2
1
2
2 L
2 L

1
1
1
2
2
2 W
1
2




8
Even chance / Re: How to get an edge flat-betting (in THEORY)
« on: March 02, 2019, 05:23:46 pm »

 +1 and reversal +0 works most of the times, but sooner or later the sequence comes and gives you -8 or any value you set as stop loss.
You might win +13 and get -8 and then again +10 and again -8 and sooner or later you will find your self at even plus-minus the house edge.

The test has already been done with 1.7 house edge for 60.000 trails flat betting.
I can only see one way around this dilemma and achieve one-year gambling with no loss or even more, but then is not flat betting anymore.
My conclusion is that you can use a level accumulation strategy.

Cheers

9
AsymBacGuy / Re: Baccarat unbeatable plan #1
« on: February 21, 2019, 07:55:06 pm »

Assume you not betting and just want to see the true bias of shoe.

Then singles are by them self as outcomes.
Series of two are by them self as outcomes.
And series of three and higher are treated as the same outcome.

Then you get the principal of 1/3

Now assume you would split each sequence into blocks of two events.

For example you see B P B PPPP BBBBB P B PPP then this is a sequence with two events/outcomes - singles and series of three and higher.
Now look at this sequence BB PP B P BB P B P B P B is a sequence with singles and series of two.
The third sequence is series of two and series of three and higher BB PPP BB PPPPPP BB PP BB PPPPPP BBB PP.

Now if a sequence not include two events/outcomes for three times in a row - a true small bias sequence you will have a triplet - no present bias.

Triplet look like this.

One single and serie of two and one serie of three or higher.
The triplets can come in any combination, one of each.

This means you can compare sequence with two otucomes hitting three times or more creating a true bias or you get a triplet.

Cheers

10
AsymBacGuy / Re: Baccarat unbeatable plan #1
« on: February 20, 2019, 05:51:07 pm »
Can you see the naturally common bias in every shoe where two events out of three dominant more than triplets?
For example, a triple would be one single one series of two and one series of three or higher.

The question is how to explore the bias with minimum attempts.
Look at this sample where all sequences have a bias except two triplets.

1
2
1 W
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1

2
2
1
1 W
1
2

1
1
2
1 L
  W
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1 W
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2

1
2 L
1 W
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2

1
1
1
1
1
2
2 W
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1

2
1
1 L
1
2
1 W
2
2
2
1

2
2
1
2 L
2 L
  W
1
1
1
2
2 W
2
1

2
2
1
1 W
1
2

1
2
1 W
1
1
2
1

2
2
1
1 W
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1

2
1
1 L
2
1 W
2
2

1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2 W
1
1
1
2
2

1
2
1 W
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2

1
1
2
2 W
1
1
1
2
2
2
2

1
2
1 W
2
1
2
2
2

1
1
2
2 W
1
1
2
2
2
2

1
2
2 L
2
1
1 L
   L

2
2
1
2 L
1 W
1
2
1
2

1
1
1
1
2
2 W
2
2
2
2
2
1
2

1
1
2
2 W
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1

2
2
2
1
1 W
1
2
1
2
1
2
1

2
2
1
2 L
2 L
1 W
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2

1
1
1
1
2
2 W
1
1

2
1
1 L
1
2
2 L
   L
1
1
1
1
1
1

11
Baccarat Forum / LW-Registry
« on: January 17, 2019, 04:24:53 pm »

I have found a way to ride the minimum bias state within a shoe using Sputnik's march.
When you get triplets you get three loses with no present bias.

The LW-Registry looks like this for three shoes.

LW W LW W LW LLW W LLL W W LW LW LW W LW LW LW W LLW W W W LLL W LLW LLW LW W

The triplets are too many loses and I thought you might tweak the results.
I notice after Asymbacguy writes about a selection process that two loses or less is the key to success.

This made me bet with one fictive loss to generate an LW-Registry that would allow you to use a smooth staking plan.
The idea is to bet within the march.

W W W LW LL W W W W W W LW LL LW LW W


Cheers

12
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 12, 2019, 05:06:24 pm »


 R.D. Ellison Selection European Wheel

Six splits for each dozen selection on the table layout
Covering 6 numbers on each side using Bi-Modal spread with a total of 12 numbers.

 See attachment:

13

What is the price and what is your PayPal address?

Cheers

14
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 12, 2019, 04:03:49 pm »
 Thanks, I could see with the description of the book, first cover, include 3Q Angle system.
 I understand that R.D. Ellison using American wheel and the spread using the chip placement create two opposite spreads on the wheel layout.
 
 Is very difficult to achieve the same spread on the wheel layout using the same Line/Corner bets on Europen wheel.
 Table/Wheel numbers are different and you don't get same even spread.

 Look at the internet an no one seems to come up with a solution for that.
 Find some nice Bi-Modal charts from Pierre Basieux, so we can play the same even spread on the wheel layout, but the chip placement is different on the table layout.

 Someone can add and reduce chips from the alternatives I attach to get an even spread.
 Thanks and credits to Pierre Basieux RIP :rose:
 

15
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 11, 2019, 09:23:29 am »

I buy the book Gamble To Win but can not find the 3Q Angle system.
My book's name is GAMBLE TO WIN - A COMPLETE GUIDE FOR THE SERIOS PLAYER

I notice there is two books with the same cover but the other books name is only GAMBLE TO WIN
Can some one sell this book to me that include the 3Q Angle system or show me the right book.

I attach the two different covers of the book.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 84 Next