BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Sputnik

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 83 Next
1
Baccarat Forum / LW-Registry
« on: January 17, 2019, 04:24:53 pm »

I have found a way to ride the minimum bias state within a shoe using Sputnik's march.
When you get triplets you get three loses with no present bias.

The LW-Registry looks like this for three shoes.

LW W LW W LW LLW W LLL W W LW LW LW W LW LW LW W LLW W W W LLL W LLW LLW LW W

The triplets are too many loses and I thought you might tweak the results.
I notice after Asymbacguy writes about a selection process that two loses or less is the key to success.

This made me bet with one fictive loss to generate an LW-Registry that would allow you to use a smooth staking plan.
The idea is to bet within the march.

W W W LW LL W W W W W W LW LL LW LW W


Cheers

2
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 12, 2019, 05:06:24 pm »


 R.D. Ellison Selection European Wheel

Six splits for each dozen selection on the table layout
Covering 6 numbers on each side using Bi-Modal spread with a total of 12 numbers.

 See attachment:

3

What is the price and what is your PayPal address?

Cheers

4
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 12, 2019, 04:03:49 pm »
 Thanks, I could see with the description of the book, first cover, include 3Q Angle system.
 I understand that R.D. Ellison using American wheel and the spread using the chip placement create two opposite spreads on the wheel layout.
 
 Is very difficult to achieve the same spread on the wheel layout using the same Line/Corner bets on Europen wheel.
 Table/Wheel numbers are different and you don't get same even spread.

 Look at the internet an no one seems to come up with a solution for that.
 Find some nice Bi-Modal charts from Pierre Basieux, so we can play the same even spread on the wheel layout, but the chip placement is different on the table layout.

 Someone can add and reduce chips from the alternatives I attach to get an even spread.
 Thanks and credits to Pierre Basieux RIP :rose:
 

5
Gambling Library / Re: 'Gamble to win: Roulette' by R.D. Ellison
« on: January 11, 2019, 09:23:29 am »

I buy the book Gamble To Win but can not find the 3Q Angle system.
My book's name is GAMBLE TO WIN - A COMPLETE GUIDE FOR THE SERIOS PLAYER

I notice there is two books with the same cover but the other books name is only GAMBLE TO WIN
Can some one sell this book to me that include the 3Q Angle system or show me the right book.

I attach the two different covers of the book.

6

I agree and that is exactly the point I was trying to make.
Maybe my expression was unclear.

No matter if you are or not a system junkie, I think paid membership is the way to proceed.

Cheers

7
I change my mind about free access.
That is a problem Victor, then everyone can pick any junk and post it to get four months free access, not good at all.
There has to be a way around that.

The idea is to get minds that think alike, system junkies to develop, improve and tweak and discover new ways to tackle roulette.
Like getting some kind of family atmosphere.

But if everyone starts to contribute junk systems to get free access to avoid paying the fee you will get another junk forum.
Maybe you should skip the idea of offering four months of free access.

Cheers

8
Vic's Ideas / Re: BetOnly.club => Non-betting discussion banned! (New site)
« on: December 28, 2018, 07:10:31 pm »

 I will also reveal a method to get 4-month access - to get a feel and see how things unfold with the new forum.
 Hope it can be like the old days when Lanky was around.

 Cheers

9
Vic's Ideas / Re: BetOnly.club => Non-betting discussion banned! (New site)
« on: December 18, 2018, 05:59:31 pm »

What do I get for 100 Euro a year, what is the expectation.
I can be considered to become a member and think the price is right for the correct information and material.

For example, if you contribute with LW-Registry methodology and other solutions and methods like the old days Lanky was around.
Then I would be considering getting something in return for my investment.

I would not like to have a bunch of inexperienced members sharing ideas and pay 100 Euro a year for that kind of material and information.
My expectation would be that more experienced members contribute and share information, that way I would get some kind of return on investment.

Let me make one comparison, I can pay 100 Euro and get professional sports betting tips for six months into my mobile phone from one tipster with an edge.
That means I will get a return of investment during that half year betting from a range between 100 up to 400 Euro.

Victor, I take this matter very seriously.
I don't join a club where there is no substance of quality.

I elaborate on this to get some feedback on how you reckon you will run that forum.
Paying 100 Euro to get a place with no (no sayers) go keep a smooth discussion will not cut it as I only need to ignore members who not walk the same path as me.

Will make one more comparison, one baccarat forum take 50 Euro a month for membership.
It would be fine if you got something else then old methods that have been known for several years.
And the discussion just circles around flat betting with no known solutions then your own homework based upon others guesswork and hints.
Wast of my time and money when I can get several professional tipsters working for me and my money offering an edge and true return on investment, flat betting.
For half the price on a yearly basis.

Do you get my point?

If we can't learn to gamble and earn money in various ways, then I would not pay for any kind of service that offers less.
Actually, I expect you to open up like in the old days and start sharing again if you don't want this idea to vanish like some other project you had.

How would you interact with other more experienced members to share and keep discussions alive at your forum that requires a payment for membership?

Cheers

10
Multiple locations / Re: Sputnik's HG
« on: December 11, 2018, 04:42:14 pm »
I will test another selection process and see if I can get similar results.
Wait for 50 spins/trials and pick one sleeping number with no hits.
Target the target number for the next 100 spins/trails.

Random parameter.
Pick Low or High and alternate after each new session with a new fresh number.

Maybe just pick one number from the beginning.

Cheers

11
Multiple locations / Re: Sputnik's HG
« on: December 11, 2018, 02:47:04 pm »

 I will elaborate on the selection process - this part I consider as a clever solution when it comes to parachute target number.

 a) I wait for 50 spins/trials and look at Low and High numbers that hit twice.
 b) Then I select one side and randomly pick a number that hit twice within 50 spins/trails

Comment: This way I pick a random number each time, not the same number, if I pick Low the first session i pick High the next session and when the third session gets back to Low I don't choose the same number as in the past.

 c) I play until a win once and quit.

Comment: I need to lose the parachute and the single number target number at the same time, they have to correlate and match. And those involve random parameters above.

Cheers

12
Multiple locations / Re: Sputnik's HG
« on: December 11, 2018, 09:21:10 am »

I am not saying this will win all the time, but I am saying that you have pretty good odds to operate with casino money.
Have more variations and tweaks.


Cheers

13
Multiple locations / Re: Sputnik's HG
« on: December 11, 2018, 09:19:21 am »

Here are more results with three losses of the target number, but the parachute win.


 1. 27
 2. 8
 3. 7
 4. 50/17
 5. 50/24
 6. 18
 7. 8
 8. 9
 9. 29
10. 21
11. 19
12. 3
13. 8
14. 7
15. 47
16. 50/42
17. 40
18. 47
19. 12
20. 50/40
21. 2
22. 50/39
23. 15
24. 35
25. 20
26. 50/32
27. 28
28. 50/7
29. 12
30. 20
31. 20
32. 44
33. 50/32
34. 42
35. 3
36. 50/32
37. 21
38. 44
39. 4
40. 50/22
41. 25
42. 9
43. 7
44. 2
45. 13
46. 29
47. 14
48. 50/5
49. 39
50. 35
51. 20
52. 3
53. 16
54. 7
55. 44
56. 50/46
57. 7
58. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
59. 12
60. 50/38
61. 9
62. 11
63. 7
64. 50/14
65. 16
66. 15
67. 42
68. 28
69. 44
70. 50/2
71. 7
72. 50/15
73. 3
74. 44
75. 50/33
76. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
77. 50/7
78. 17
79. 8
80. 10
81. 50/50 target number fail, but parachute win
82. 9
83. 6
84. 1
85. 14
86. 50/4
87. 41
88. 11
89. 14
90. 30
91. 21
92. 11
93. 2
94. 20
95. 8
96. 41
97. 21
98. 4
99. 3
100. 4

14
Multiple locations / Sputnik's HG
« on: December 11, 2018, 09:16:30 am »
I just want to show a selection method that fail 6 times during 100 sessions and still you won all 100 sessions.
This is theory and you use the following information at your own risk.

INTRODUCTION:

This means that if you can lose the selection 6 times and still win and a total of 100 sessions, then during a year that would be around 20 losing selections for 365 sessions.
The probability dictate it can be done.

There are 365 days for one year and the interest banks give you equal zero.
365 Euro playing 1 Euro minimum, pretty good interest.
3650 Euro playing 10 Euro minimum, closer to the stock market return for the average investor.

What I would like to do is to calculate a higher base bet and then when winning half the amount regress and using half of the original unit size.
That way you only risk your money for a one-half year and then operate with casino money for the next half year.

Problems with this idea are that the cost is very expensive for the whole parachute
One could reduce the cost and win half the amount the last steps of the parachute.

Mr. J inspired me into this field of the selection process.
Here is a selection that won 100 sessions using a Parachute Method.

1) One single number that hit within 25 attempts are equal an even money bet.

Hot & Cold

Assume you have two reds in a row or two blacks in a row.
Then for the next two bets, you have 3 in 4 to hit a winning bet.

For example:

RR / RR Win
RR / RB Win
RR / BR Win
RR / BB Lose

That is the Hot selection where one color repeat.

Now reverse.
Assume you have RR and get BB then you lose both bets.
Then you have 3 in 4 ways to get one opposite color.
A sleeping color or Cold selection.

BB / RR Win
BB / RB Win
BB / BR Win
BB / BB Lose

Now numbers and the Parachute Method.
Assume one number hit twice within 50 attempts.
Then that is the same thing getting two reds.
So for the next 50 attempts, you play that this number will repeat once.

Assume you lose, then you have two losing bets during 50 attempts, also equal two blacks.
Now you play 50 attempts that you will get at least one opposite of that particular number.

Now you bet the Parachute Method until you win once and then start over the tracking and charting process.
So even if the single number would fail to show during 100 attempts, so can the Parachute Method win.

1. 21
2. 7
3. 34
4. 30
5. 7
6. 26
7. 36
8. 32
9. 18
10. 6
11. 6
12. 34
13. 49
14. 43
15. 13
16. 8
17. 11
18. 42
19. 6
20. 50/8
21. 33
22. 5
23. 34
24. 7
25. 14
26. 4
27. 18
28. 24
29. 37
30. 33
31. 36
32. 50/21
33. 50/18
34. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
35. 34
36. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
37. 50/6
38. 3
39. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
40. 1
41. 9
42. 9
43. 3
44. 35
45. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
46. 40
47. 50/48
48. 50/15
49. 37
50. 21
51. 50/36
52. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
53. 50/17
54. 38
55. 48
56. 6
57. 50/36
58. 50/49
59. 7
60. 14
61. 21
62. 50/44
63. 7
64. 19
65. 21
66. 50/50 target number fail but parachute win
67. 34
68. 25
69. 7
70. 9
71. 29
72. 11
73. 26
74. 9
75. 50/45
76. 2
77. 15
78. 14
79. 23
80. 50/7
81. 50
82. 12
83. 42
84. 15
85. 18
86. 27
87. 50/26
88. 6
89. 50/20
90. 13
91. 50/41
92. 50/19
93. 11
94. 6
95. 9
96. 3
97. 2
98. 39
99. 50/32
100. 50/12

1. EC

2. Dozen
3. Dozen

4. Line
5. Line
6. Line
7. Line

8. Corner
9. Corner
10. Corner
11. Corner
12. Corner
13. Corner

14. Street
15. Street
16. Street
17. Street
18. Street
19. Street
20. Street
21. Street

22. Split
23. Split
24. Split
25. Split
26. Split
27. Split
28. Split
29. Split
30. Split
31. Split
32. Split
33. Split

34. Single
35. Single
36. Single
37. Single
38. Single
39. Single
40. Single
41. Single
42. Single
43. Single
44. Single
45. Single
46. Single
47. Single
48. Single
49. Single
50. Single
51. Single
52. Single
53. Single
54. Single
55. Single
56. Single
57. Single
58. Single

59. Single
60. Single
61. Single
62. Single
63. Single
64. Single
65. Single
66. Single
67. Single
68. Single
69. Single
70. Single
71. Single
72. Single
73. Single
74. Single
75. Single
76. Single
77. Single
78. Single
79. Single
80. Single
81. Single
82. Single
83. Single

84. Single
85. Single
86. Single
87. Single
88. Single
89. Single
90. Single
91. Single
92. Single
93. Single
94. Single
95. Single
96. Single
97. Single
98. Single
99. Single
100. Single

15
AsymBacGuy / Re: Baccarat unbeatable plan #1
« on: November 29, 2018, 09:21:14 am »

Jimske you have to understand that I have not developed or made a weighted count system, I only show examples of regression.
I want to explore this territory and see if I can create a weighted count system and share it.
But nothing is complete or under construction.

Cheers

 

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 83 Next