Quote from: alrelax on December 26, 2020, 03:37:29 AM
Love the "Positiveness"! Thanks!
Hello!
2020 is very bad for me when it comes to gambling investment.
Hope I can recover in 2021.
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: alrelax on December 26, 2020, 03:37:29 AM
Love the "Positiveness"! Thanks!
Quote from: alrelax on October 25, 2020, 06:22:31 AM
We had some issues in connecting with the server after we did some upgrades and some changes on our end.
It took a few days and when we went to reconnect we actually didn't know it was not back online until a few people brought it to our attention yesterday.
We were only seeing the admin side of it. Everything should be back online now.
Looking for some confirmation from anybody and if you're seeing this can you please post a reply so we know that the members are getting back on. As well if you have any problems you can post them also thanks.
Quote from: WALKINGMAN on January 24, 2020, 03:07:24 AM
if i have free time i will share some more of simple approach of baccarat at least I share to you all excuse my of english. While waiting for trigger of 5 string bet player every banker appear stop after 2 lossess.
Walkingman
Quote from: Jimske on April 13, 2019, 09:26:49 PM
Sounds like a plan!
Quote from: Lugi on November 15, 2018, 08:14:47 AM
My MM can vary, but in general usually not.
I sometimes use two levels of chip values, so the lower value chips have experienced LL, the higher chip value has experienced LW.
I operate for things to even out over the course of a session, and expect wins and loses to be evenly distributed within a shoes.
If the lower chip values start to get out of hand, I'll simply transfer a portion of the deficit over the to larger chip value and aim to play more shoes /longer to clear. Required units on both sides in reality do not have to be fully cleared \ won, because when I start any session, there is an initial goal target. So for example, let's say I start the higher chip level at 8, and after many shoes it sits at 4, I could if I wish, decide to end the session, because I've actually made 4 units, obviously dependant on the lower chip value not greater than the initial start count.
To conclude, all this nonsense we about negative progressions being dangerous, requiring massive bankrolls, yada yada, I assure you, I rarely place a bet greater than 10 units. I grind things out, I do my utmost to avoid risk and big drawdowns, if I lose a series of bets, I stop digging and grind it back, because I have a lot of confidence in the bet selections that I use.
Quote from: Lugi on May 01, 2018, 03:26:19 AM
Should have named this thread LIARs.
There is really no need to disparage a bet selection which you probably don't recall. He is a pretty smart guy and he asked me not to post publicly, so out of respect I haven't. Anyway we are at cross purposes here, I only mentioned it in passing as a response to Mike, as it kind of makes mathematical sense in the long term. Yet in the real world prone shall we say to get uncomfortable at the tables in other words can produce many LIAR's, only good enough for a table minimum flat bet approach. Like I say I use it to keep a shoe moving if the case arises (playing solo), operates very similar to DBL but makes more sense when you look at it mathematically. It is far from being any type of HG, will likely burn if you use a negative progression, yet should produce a few units profit inside a few shoes. So let's put this to bed, it plays no part in how currently play.
In regards to the general question of LAIRs, in a game of independent trials, you simply just never know. I can't count the LAIR's for the 1/256 option, as I've already overlapped my Excel spreadsheet with other bet options, so would need to clear then redo the exercise to give you precise figures. TBH I much prefer to play live and see how things unfold at the table.
My worst case testing, is 6LIAR which occurred twice in 50 shoes. In my experience one should expect a worst performance when taking methods from the kitchen table to the live table and this 1/256 expectation is no different. 24 hrs ago I got 7LIAR, however the saving grace, is that this occurred once in about 15 shoes. It is easy to get excited about bet placement while testing. Then during live play, along comes the shoe from hell which not only consumes your bankroll, but also zaps your confidence, with what is probably a decent method of play, whereas more attention should be paid to the frequency of the 'shoes from hell'.
Regarding %LAIRs, if I isolated the prime bet selection, the player is not betting enough hands per shoe. 1 or 2, 3 bets, sometimes no bet opportunity within 70 hands. Not practical for live play, so you should get a sense that the LAIR's are going to be very short and manageable, such as 2 or 3 perhaps.
Quote from: Nickmsi on August 13, 2018, 03:18:25 AM
Hi Lugi
That is exactly what we are doing. Playing on line with a bot in small sessions with a negative progression.
With the Triplets as the bet selection we have won 62 out of 63 sessions.
Cheers
Nick
Quote from: Sputnik on July 13, 2018, 09:13:31 AM
I solve the puzzle, now I can play positive progressions or just flat betting my way to heaven.
Quote from: Sputnik on November 03, 2017, 06:44:43 PM
I just want to show the strength behind the selection method - this is winning two in a row without progression - flat betting - but there is variance so in the end you need a mild progression
W W
L W L W W
W L L W L W W
W W
L W L W W
L L W L W L W W
W W
W L W W
L L W L W L W W
L L W W
W W
W L W L W W
W W
L W L L L
+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+2
+2
+2
-3
Quote from: Sputnik on October 29, 2017, 06:54:07 PM
Here we go again with 1 in 3 odds using three different formations that has the same random distribution as three dozen.
What i want to show with this example is how each formation can strike for several times in a row or all three formations can alternate.
That is one selection process using this concept, another concept is to bet against the strikes.
The selection process has such high quality so i have been testing with with positiv progression and mild progression and winning two in a row concept.
I post the selection formations or sequence patterns before and will copy the material and explain how, when and why to place your bets in certain ways.
Cheers
Quote from: Qswaggerstupid18 on January 21, 2017, 09:11:39 AM
Lol Vo, +70 units is great for me in a month!, again it doesn't take me no more than 10 - 20mins a day to play, but I'm VERY happen with my results, Especially if it's CONSISTENT!!!! again that's why I'm currently building my bankroll to go inside an have $1,000 as a base bet, we taking about $70,000... IM ALWAYS LOOKING AT THE BIGGER PICTURE... But alrelax, everyone says LONG TERM!!... what's exactly long term!!??.... A HUGE professional player once told me 2 years is considered long terms!... Or does it go by a certain amount of units you're up ... Maybe +1000 units or +10,000 units!???... Thanks
Quote from: Trbfla on April 08, 2017, 04:24:56 AM
shoe 16 + 5
shoe 17 +11
shoe 18 +10
shoe 19 +9
shoe 20 -6
shoe 16-40 =39 units
using a 1, 2, 1, 1 2, 3 , 4 progression