Quote from: Wewin2222 on April 06, 2017, 02:11:46 AM
Played at 5 Dimes and would win small wagers and loose every time I increased my wager without fail. They would always take my money on anything larger than 200.00. I have wagered on sports through them but it's like pulling teath to get your money. You feel like a begger to get any money at all from them.

Wewin2222

Thanks for the update.

Were the table game wagers on the "live" games or RNG?

AD

Quote from: alrelax on March 10, 2017, 08:16:50 AM
What is up with Mini-Vans??  Every time I turn around and read something or hear about a criminal, assault or scam--it almost always involves the people getting away or last seen in a Mini-Van???

Heck, back in high school we had full sized vans, like Chevy C30's I thing they were.  We stripped them out and put shag carpeting in them, built a platform for a mattress up in the read over the wheel wells.  1/4" plywood on the sides and paneling over that.  Painted the side windows out if any and the rear windows inside as well, black.  The colors inside was Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin blues-greens-purples and hazy yellows.  We had a been bag or two and a cooler in the main part.  A couple battery powered lamps attached to the paneling in the corners.  That was the 70;s and early 80's.  We had fun in our vans, after high school we took our dirt bikes out, on weekends we were at the motocross race tracks.  Who the heck stayed in motels, we had full sized vans! 

Such memories.

Oh My God.  You just described my C10 Chevy Van that I had "way back when" almost exactly, right down to the battery powered lights!!!

AD

Gotta agree.

Not being able to correct a simple spelling "errer" when reading a post is very irritating.

Uh, make that errir, nope, try errour,  nope, try airor.

Ah, the heck with it.

AD

As my 5th grade teachers used to always say when "testing".

Be sure and show your work.

I'm sure that with the voluminous testing you've done on this "system" that you do have some valid testing data available for others in your peer group to evaluate.

AD 

Nathan and Roulette pretty much summed it up.

AD

Quote from: wannawin on March 06, 2017, 07:40:22 PM
Can anyone give the short version of what is happening? I have not visited the forum for days and I do not feel like reading 200 posts to find out.

If someone has it mastered please answer this. Is the method good? how many spins have you tested? how many units per spin is the total average in your tests? where is the testing program if someone has posted it here or in some other forum. Just the substance please, no time for dramas . thank you.

No time for drama?  You've missed the entire point of that thread!!!

AD

I GET IT!   MOST EXCELLENT!

Please delete it now so nobody else gets it.

Thanks.

I will be available for an infinite discussion of how it works for the next 23 pages of this thread.

AD

It's called trolling and until moglizu or one of his anointed minions posts a detail play sheet (should take about three minutes to produce) he will continue to jerk everybody around in this thread.

It is kind of funny watching it though.

Now that he has deleted the kernel of the method, it's kind of pointless to "discuss" it.

AD

moglizu,

  I thought you were done with this thread when you removed your method.

  Why continue to come back?

  AD

What?  No editing of posts available?


AD

Gentlemen,

  The obvious "solution" to this entire thread is to have one of the members who believes they understand this method correctly to simply post up a play sheet with a spin by spin description of what they have done and why.

   It should save everyone a whole lot of time and get the players who are interested in this on to their various methods of testing.

   Until such time, you're all just spinning your wheels taking guesses at what this is and how it "works".

   VDW was equally mysterious until play by play examples were posted.

   So, whomever the four guys are who understand it, just post up the play.

   Problem solved.

   AD  (not a roulette player(

Quote from: AsymBacGuy on February 28, 2017, 06:33:04 PM
Good choice Al.
I'd suggest a BMW i8, fantastic line and an unbelievable gas saver.

as.

Wow!  BMW makes cars, too!  That's great.

AD

Quote from: gr8player on February 25, 2017, 03:44:19 PM
Again, I'd think twice before committing any real dollars to rather phony on-line betting services.  'nuff said 'bout that....

What if you play at an apparently "legitimate" online service?

One that has paid on time when requested and has done so for several years.

AD

Albalaha,

  Early on in this thread you mentioned that changing out "W/L" for any EC wager would result in basically the same outcome for your testing.

  I do not believe this to be true.

  With the examples presented, the enormous amount of long string "L" would skew the results so far to the positive for anyone playing a streak type method that the results would invariably show up as "positive" for any run.

   So, for anyone "testing" these results and transposing "W/L" into "P/B" or "R/B", they would be using bad data for their tests.

   I only bring this up as so far I've been showing a profit on every test posted running a rudimentary streak method.

  Generating a string of "W" and "L" is not the same as generating a string of "B" and "P".

   
   From what you have presented in this thread, it could probably be boiled down into merely asking "Can you survive a loss of 17 in a row?"  (I think that's the largest "L" string displayed so far).

   Just my thoughts on what is being presented

   AD

Quote from: ProfessorSlot on February 24, 2017, 09:50:55 PM
I think betonline is good to try. They accept US player and you get to play with real dealers live on camera. They also have good live support and they are already know by some online gamblers.

How often do you play there?   Any problems with the video feed?

What documentation did they require to sign up?

AD