See the fate of the second worst number.
[attachimg=1]

There is nothing that you can guess, patternanalysis @smiley @ englishwriter.
    I am testing the second worst number 34, in the same way. Will give you more puzzles to guess.

Hang on, buddy.
           Not for sale because HG can not be sold or purchased. 


It has to be earned. Archie is correct that no one can pay enough for such things and a true HG owner can earn anything he wishes with itself. One more thing, one can not earn very big with it, since it has drawdown too and only those who expect a mild earning, working hard, can use it. Not for daydreamers.

A comparison with how it did in flat bet, would be great.

This snapshot will reveal a bit of how my methodology worked on number 3
[attachimg=1]

XXVV,
             It is only about a passion to do which is considered impossible. Why do people climb Mount Everest? They may land there in a few minutes with an airplane too. For you, it may look like wasting time (14 hrs) to earn E200 merely but for me, it is about becoming 1 in a billion or rather only one person who could ever do this.

@ Vic and Max,

Quotei.e. If a group of 5 people "pool", when one no-deposit bonus is fulfilled, all win. Covering for even showing the willingness. Feel free to organize such a thing in our pages.

            At times, it takes lots of pain. Yesterday, I played about 14 hours to finish this. Rival powered casinos have already put me in their "black book" for winning repeatedly from many of casinos powered by their software. I have beaten all, playtech, microgaming, top, VIG live games, Rival and many more. More than winning free money, it was about beating it with such challenges, again and again on various type of RNGs.
               Doing it in routine, or for masses won't be easy due to IP and many other issues.

Vic,
         I proved it again and again that basic maths of gambling is a failure. Ask anyone to calculate the probability of winning such wagerings and further ask the probability of a single man winning such bonuses 30 times. The probability will reach 1 in billions but I am not that big. I am just logical.

Won my 30th No Deposit Bonus today:
winnerclub casino offered an Euro 30 no deposit bonus. If you play slot you need to bet the bonus 50 times, i.e. a wagering of E1500, while if u play roulette, it will be counted by 1/4 of what u bet actually. Hence, one need to actually bet Euro 6000, if he plays roulette alone. I used roulette to enhance my bankroll and played slots from winnings. Finally, I did complete this impossible looking task in a single day.

See screenshot of chat confirming this win:
[attachimg=1]

Any news on what happened to this pool play? Another disaster?

Evaluating your own system is like writing a critique of your own book. Bosom that look terribly firm may be backed by a push-up bra.

Every spin data is entirely different from all other and there are innumerable permutations and combinations possible in a session which is of even 100 spins. Since we can never test most of the probabilities, we may be under illusion of our method being a pure winner, while it is either set to win in less than 50% probabilities or which can win say 90% combinations with a progression while the remaining 10% are indeed potent enough to kill the winnings of those 90% combinations due to the failure of progressions.
            If someone wins 100 sessions in a row while testing and lose 10 consecutive sessions in real money play, in RNG or live roulette, he should keep all these realities in mind.

Such losses are obvious when you are losing your mental faculties by over drinking. Casinos never miss such opportunities to extract max out of you. The man lost a very big sum so his anger is obvious and if he was actually comped with "free drinks" even after being highly intoxicated already, he deserves to get back his losses(for the span when he was strategically fed with alcohol) from the casino along with damages.

Gordon and samnl,
           You guys are overpanicked with a routine technical problem. There are many online casinos that pay in a fortnight after asking for withdrawals. So much hue and cry is correct if they deny paying your money to u.

I do not understand why so much hue and cry over this idea. It obviously can not have an edge, in long run. No method can filter out better numbers to bet and can win flat bet. If it is even remotely possible without any MM requirements,it would kill casinos.
                                      Old ideas wrapped in new names do not make a winner. Without a classy MM, all betselection will lose.