Quote from: Xander on January 26, 2014, 07:13:41 AM
Alababa,

Here's why nobody is taking you serious.  You don't post any math or descriptions that describe why your system could possibly be mathematically sound.    Testimonials about past performance are meaningless, if you can't describe why your bets should perform better than expectation. 



-Xander

Do you feel that your empty talks helping anyone here? Someone said that he is beating something that nobody did earlier and even posted that in his way. Instead of simulating that himself or anybody else, people are distracting all from main issue. Does pockets actually win all numbers with his way?
I say no. Simulate it to get any conclusion, if anybody believes him (including himself). He has nothing to reveal something by whispering in someone's ears.

When Pockets saw me stopping my sports pick, he wrote: "Just a short message to Albalaha and any others who were following high probability picks, it was a good topic, Sumit was providing great picks, it's a pity he decided not to continue. There was lot of work that went in that topic and to me the decision to lock and not continue didn't sound good. A personal message for Sumit, you might want to take it or leave it. Buddy, live for yourselves. Like you, yourselves and only yourselves. if posting something is giving you satisfaction, why notice those distant barks. Just rephrasing your signature, only a genius knows how to turn noise to music. Decide yourselves whether you are a genius or a common man."


Now he says," As I said when kids don't get their way they throw their tantrums.  When the tantrums are not heard they make a pity face.  That's what you are doing now and you are doing it good.  I bet you are a lawyer. Next thing they do is forgetting it and getting involved in something else. And that's what is going to happen you are just going to run away with yore lies. "



and reason behind both remarks being same : frustration due to inability to do anything and only lurking here and there to get something that can mint money effortlessly.

                               He dare not simulate what he said in his "way to beat number 3" because he knows that what he said was just a joke and using the same method in other numbers, it will fall flat. His excuse: he won't because albalaha is not showing his grail. What a clevera##.

I clearly State that his method is a failure in random sessions of similar nature and difficulty. He has just made a "suitable size fitting plug".
         Any person can simulate his ideas(if one gets to understand what he meant to say first) and can see this.

"Not asking you to post it, just if it exists."

  He would have revealed all magic potions but he won't since Albalaha did not do either. Guys, you can now blame me for not letting you have two HGs, one of albalaha, the scammer and one from Saint Pockets. Oh, I missed something, it is not a Holy Grail but it beats all numbers of american roulette, even if it has a Standard Deviation of -3 or more in 15,000 spins.

                       I am sure Albalaha may also be a reason behind superman, Bayes, Weddings, Gizmotron, MBB,XXVV and many others to either not show their respective grails to not so genius members and guests here or to prove logically as to why their methods are grails or even playable.

In that topic he says: "Sorry, took sometime to go through the 15000 spins manually using this and hence did not reply on the post for a day."
  He just made a suitable plug that suits a particular hole and forgot that this plug which is meant for a particular hole will be no good for holes of other sizes. This is exactly what everyone has done in all challenges of mine. IF pocket's claim is real and with a single method he can beat the best doing number 29 to worst doing 3, all, he can create a plug that can fit all holes but he won't tell any of you that. Why? Because, albalaha, who is a scammer by profession, did not show it either. He will only tell you cycles that will create cyclones in your mind or can fit in number 3 hole only.

QuoteIf you think it's futile, I will leave it here.

Saint Pockets going to run away from the challenge. He made a magic potion and was about to display but things gone wrong, so magic potion evaporate and no longer have a magic.
                          You can only spread new set of fallacies and not any working principal, that can help anybody, even slightly.

"If you want to prove you are not lying post your method as I have done  first"

You Haven't posted a method but a joke, otherwise people would have jumped over that. Play in cycles of this and that and become a cyclone. Do not make fun of yourself, anymore.
                   If you want to give this forum one thing that can practically be used to benefit and you truly feel that your method beats all numbers of zumma, post that with illustration. Believe me, you will be a legend here and nobody will talk of albalaha, the scammer or albalaha the devil, ever.
    Otherwise keep your gossip running.

                               

So far, whoever did any challenge of mine has done only reverse engineering, nobody has beaten any of them, by a real playable method making only fun of them, be it MBB doing my dozen challenge, Patternanalysis did my EC challenge and you and GGP claim to do #3 in funnier way than ever.
                    Had any of them been real, people would have benefited a lot from them. All those challenges are called, "Sessions from Hell" and if you beat any of them in a playable approach, you are "Angel from Haven".
       Do not try to fool the forum and to fool yourself with your illusion.

And you are someone who is showing your kiddings in my posts, showing your frustration only. Do you have any courage to prove what you just stated? If not, go and speak this to some kindergarten kid. You are making only fun of yours with your claims of winning number 3 as many others did. Simulate it for everyone to see or do not speak such lies ever.

QuoteIt wins for every number of Zumma.  Yes all numbers.

Think twice before making such statements. First of all, your and GGP ways of solving the #3 are so vague that it will take a month to understand what u mean to say. Put your way of doing #3 in excel here, so that it can be seen step by step, if you dare to prove your point. Then I will put three more numbers of zumma, one among worst, one average hitting and one that is doing great. If you beat all with one single and unambiguous way( do not offer different solutions, seeing different problems), I will accept your supremacy over me. Do you have enough courage to take this?

Haha
      Iggiv,
                   It is nothing else but sheer frustration of yours. When I this grail or with ophis( that has beaten more than 10 millons spins if you trust Ophis at least), for that matter, I was not satisfied. Why?
      All these were merely sufficient to prove that the game is beatable in long run even with reasonable bankroll and max bet but they were not practically playable in a real short session. That was something that always haunted me that my success in only partial. While Ophis got out of all forums after doing this and earning a few thousands euros every month running this 24x7 on three computers, I did not earn a cent from it.
             I always wanted to do a real grail that can win in max 200 spins which a reasonable person can do with a reasonable bankroll and max bet. After doing all these researches, I always knew that I need only one thing to win, a money management (read progression, regression, stop roll and all) that can let me survive through worst losing stretches and worst average hit rate both running together. When I looked through what should be a model to test that upon, I saw #3 of american zumma book. A hit rate of 45.6 spins/win and a Standard deviation of -3.35, 329 hits only in 15000 spins. About 5 times it won in over 200 spins, about 10 times, it hit above 100 spins. It was a wow thing for me.
                     I opened an open challenge to see even a single person can help me by guiding me how to do this. None did. Bayes said, I have no idea how to do this. Gizmotron said, it is impossible (in my blog). Whoever tried to do this merely tried to reverse engineer the particular L/W in this and did not offer a general solution to this problem. Be it GGP or pockets, none moved even an inch towards beating such things. If you do not believe me, u can simulate them on any similar case, they will fail very badly.
               Finally, I could devise a progression which can sustain and win such cases. I have a money management that can beat a dozen if it has only 40 hits in 185 spins. Chances to get less than 40 wins is 7 in 1000 sessions, mathematically(as Bayes confirmed me). Now, if I win 993 sessions and lose in 7 only and if I am not betting sky high to achieve this, isn't it a grail?

Starting bankroll=1000 units
bets made on 100,000 spins
Ending bankroll=6684
net profit=5,684 = 568.4%
max bet=32




Can anybody match?

Quote from: Bayes on January 25, 2014, 09:29:56 AM

It was on rouletteforum.cc about a year ago when JL was making all those grand claims. I wrote some software which generated spins and the results were uploaded to a web site. There were problems with it but MBB (Skakus, as he is on rouletteforum.cc) got an impressive result - over 4 standard deviations if I remember rightly. JL lost his bank several times.

               Bayes, if it is the sole condition to prove a grail, I have 12 grails so far, at least  that has done such things or better. Was MBB's private testing results better than this : http://albalaha.lefora.com/attach/view/ma/c093426de06890dd4efff3cce576b7e7f6011e56.jpg


it is still documented and listed here: http://www.testmystrategy.com/contest_all.php?p=3


See the results from an open public document(not a darkroom testing)
[attachimg=1]

QuoteI don't know what you know, but that's for sure what you don't know.

             Had you known anything, you wouldn't have bothered to question me how and whys.

Quote from: iggiv on January 24, 2014, 08:30:43 PM
Albalaha, you don't know a half what you think you know. It is very real to predict the outcome. But never consistently (unless you have a physical advantage, then it's a different story). Numerology has nothing to do with that.

I don't have to prove anything because i don't claim anything. So i don't corner myself into some ridiculous situation. And i don't need to draw attention like some with ridiculous claims which have nothing to do with reality.

                You are not having anything to claim. We can never win by predicting in roulette. Roulette future outcomes are never predictable even slightly without using very sophisticated roulette computers. We can only speculate and not predict in a game of chance. Roulette can be either not "random" or  "predictable", if you understand  meanings of both terms.


"Albalaha, you don't know a half what you think you know."

I know very well what I know and you can never know what is known to me. lol
             Feeling like sitting with kindergarten kids (most of the times). Nothing to debate. Just false ego and fallacies.

QuoteIn reality if u got a sleeper, it is a big chance that this sleeper will sleep for long long time, and if u keep betting it like that it will kill your bankroll. Don't bet on sleepers. And Allabaha is talking exactly about betting sleepers.[

       Whatever clairvoyance you have earned over various forums to predict which is the "active" and which one is "sleeper" dozen, I did never say to bet that or anything about how to pick a dozen/column or any bet.
    You want to increase the accuracy of your predictions, go and attend numerology courses. lol
@ Bayes,
        You said that (Marshall Bing Bell**) has a demonstrable success with his grail. Where is that?