Dear Kimo Li,
Your two statements:
clash with each other.
You can see a compilation of a few of my old methods, you can visit this: http://betselection.cc/index.php?topic=2673.0
Kimo,
Your betselections are innovative like nuke, bowtie, star,pie, boomrang and..........................
but...
Are they really giving any edge to a player in overall and sufficient to earn without any kind of money management or does it really increase the accuracy of predictions? If not, they are only as good as any random betselection.
I know all pros and cons to all the so called "progressions" and all of them "benefits" and "harms" proportionally and none is fit to be used in all kind of sessions.
Your two statements:
QuoteAlbalaha,and
Your methods, of which I know nothing about, and care not to know, are yours.
QuoteIf you want to speak of your methods, please do so. I am more that willing to listen.If
clash with each other.
You can see a compilation of a few of my old methods, you can visit this: http://betselection.cc/index.php?topic=2673.0
Kimo,
Your betselections are innovative like nuke, bowtie, star,pie, boomrang and..........................
but...
Are they really giving any edge to a player in overall and sufficient to earn without any kind of money management or does it really increase the accuracy of predictions? If not, they are only as good as any random betselection.
QuoteI will cease in answering any of your questions as your intent is to extract information that will synthesize your knowledge of roulette and to claim it your own.Is it a joke of some kind? Both of your books are as much open to all forum members as wikipedia. I have a compilation of hundreds of books on roulette and gambling costing anywhere from $1.99 to a few thousands of dollars. I can say none makes a player any better in terms of winning. Unless you have an exclusive skill to handle the best, average and the worst session equally easily, you are no better than any "unskilled" and "uneducated" gambler.
I know all pros and cons to all the so called "progressions" and all of them "benefits" and "harms" proportionally and none is fit to be used in all kind of sessions.