congratulations Chris,
Can we see any snap of baby, maybe with you?[smiley]aes/angel.png[/smiley]
Can we see any snap of baby, maybe with you?[smiley]aes/angel.png[/smiley]
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuoteWhat could be worse? Let's say, 328 hits in 15000 spins?
Quote It happens over a few spins or many spins, and the variance is exclusive to your system. To someone else it may be entirely normal. When you are losing, others are winning.
Quote from: Number Six on November 13, 2013, 12:10:46 PMWhat could be worse than 329 hits in 15000 spins? It means one hit in 45.6 spins on an average. That too for entire 15k spins. I have thrown my open challenge around this worst case which none could dare to handle, so far.
When the win is "assured" within the table limits, the risk is 0%, regardless of how much you splurge on the progression. That is absolute perfection. In the real world how do you know a level of variance is the worst? In your Zuma example the SD is little over 3.0 for a 00 wheel. That is rare but by no means the worst you'll encounter. And it can take a different form every time. In your theory the longer you play the more you win. In reality the longer you play the closer you get to ruin.
Quotethe use of 1 unit to 10 units is not a progressionWhat a humorous remark. This way, all progressions used in all sort of gambling is a part of Kelly criterion.