Congratulations on the win of Man City.
[smiley]aes/wine.png[/smiley]

QuoteSo Albalaha there is your chance to earn if you are so good at sports picking.
Open a blog, show to people how good you are, and then they will buy subscription from you.

You can see this sports section with my high probability picks and results thereupon and also in my blog.
The place that u r referring has such poor performance that the number one tipster of the place is earning only 3% yield in total.
Placed bet=$14380 and return=$ 14817.56
this is happening after 2155 picks.

Good Job, Pockets. I wanted to add Man City as my choice of high probability pick of the day but after u have written all these that would look as a copy.
Good luck.

QuoteBut I know where to find such successful people who are competing in this and give free picks. That saves a lot of time.

Let me know about them too. So far, I have not seen better (in number of wins:losses and ROI both),
than my own picks, for so many months.
Please let us all have the best picks. It takes me up to 2 hours to sort one pick.

QuoteSo can you explain how do you mean it can be played even better? In terms of money management?

By playing only real high probability matches as I do. Have you checked my picks, their success rate and ROI? One can earn even flat bet.
Sports betting is lesser volatile than playing roulette and you can opt for picks with least risk (even at lesser payouts). Bet selection is the biggest asset in sports betting which is not true for roulette. I hope you got my point.

There is no need to play it like roulette where winning is considered next to impossible.
It can be played far better.

my 1-4 numbers betting strategy needs 2000 units max for the worst session I can face. Actually need of bankroll depends upon your betting strategy. If a black/red martingale player needs 2k, it is bad.

5 Wins, 1 loss and 1 bet/event cancelled in my free high probability picks in my blog. More than 100% ROI, so far there too.

I do not think this is a very wise progression. This will lose more and win less in long term. I have simulated it and it is a disaster. It can be good if someone can ensure consistency in his betselection which is not possible.

Go to Ophis section and check for the biggest thing ever done in the history of roulette. More than 10 millions spins beaten. Find anything even remotely close to this feat and Tomla will be greater than albalaha not albahala.

Buddy,
        I have already achieved many feats in roulette, baccarat and sports that one can only envy of and can never surpass or even equal. Most of them are open to see.

One day Tomla will learn to write my username correctly and to speak like a gentleman.
lol[smiley]aes/wink.png[/smiley]

Tom,
        will you ever learn to speak like a gentleman and argue in a behaved manner than shouting and speaking foul? I just asked that if your presumption regarding travelling have any scientific basis or merely a hypothesis or fallacy. Do you have any record of losing matches against the natural odds due to this?
          Hypothesis and scientific truth have world of difference. If it is a scientific reason, it should affect all matches not just in 2005 alone.

Another Sports Fallacy. Can you establish this presumption of yours by any scientific analysis? If your presumption (if I do not call it fallacy) is scientific, you should be able to prove its effect in past records too. Can you?

I beg to differ here. There are sports that needs much of stamina than NFL matches like Test Matches in Cricket. People travel across globe and yet they play very well. It can have some micro level effects but it can't affect the performance of a team so much that can make a tilt even slightly towards losses.