QuoteHey, I told you (and showed you) how to beat that silly "challenge" and after I did, it quietly just died on your forum

You never did anything worth recognizing in the challenge. Do not try to blindfold all along with yourself.

Quote  You and I look at the problems differently.  Your attack is some sort of "brute force trauma" to the table while mine is a bit more cerebral and civilized.

You do not do anything worth following and you are totally unaware of my attack. If I use "brute force", in beating more than 10 millions I would have down by billions.

QuoteI think I'll make up my own challenge.  Let's play dozens.  Can anybody beat this?   LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL W LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.
  Yes, it's silly and about as original as your first post.

Even this is not as silly as you think. I can't win this but can lose the least
using same set of methods as I would like to play to extract max in exactly inverse case
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWWWW


           Except when I refer to Bayes or a few very nice fellows (a few are doing admirable work), I feel like sitting in a kindergarten class in forum.
        All the same primitive failure approaches and mostly copy-paste guys.[smiley]aes/angry.png[/smiley][smiley]aes/angry.png[/smiley]

Quote from: Albalaha on September 09, 2013, 07:37:11 PM
NFL:
Match: Philadelphia Eagles At Washington Redskins

Bet upon: Over 52 points
10/09/2013
00:10

Yessssssssssss.
Just won it.[smiley]aes/thumb.png[/smiley]

QuoteIts unproductive at the moment.

What looks productive to you? Can you name one single system that has made you a better player, posted on this forum or anywhere else?

QuoteSuddenly, I have a flash of inspiration. I'll set a(nother) challenge on a forum.  In that way I'll get others doing all the work, the tedious research and testing. And, if I'm really lucky, I might just get one or two systems out of the exercise that I can then flog on the quiet.

               Do you feel anybody over here has this standard? My #3 Zumma Challenge is still on for everyone. I have yet to see any digestible approach of trying to beat that.
                I as a researcher and system developer (call me seller or scammer or whatever) start my testings on the worst session first and if the idea looks doing better than flat betting then I test semi-harsh, normal and favorable sessions as well.
          I want you guys to go with the same approach. If you shy away from harsh sessions and keep counting on your success in favorable and semi-harsh sessions only, you will only rely upon luck.
             Nobody is going to do tedious research and testing to beat this, I truly believe this. I do not find any other example in the entire forum world.
              If anyone among you really beats this challenge, I am not going to carry his work in my pockets. It will be openly available for all of us, to use in whatever manner, you wish.
                    I expected same level of topic bashing debate from you guys instead of problem bashing. Roulette will always be unbeatable for you. Long live casinos.
              There is only one member "Kattila" who openly took one of my challenges in this forum and did it in a reasonable manner. I posted it openly while my friend Philip (malcop) created a nice tracker for it.
Have a look: http://albalaha.lefora.com/2013/04/09/kattilas-dozen-method-with-tracker/

NFL:
Match: Philadelphia Eagles At Washington Redskins

Bet upon: Over 52 points
10/09/2013
00:10

Ken,
         Can you feel like a winner if you play  your "method" very correctly and systematically and end up in a loss due to missing a bet somehow?
             I won't. Even the best of methods get you losses at wrong time when variance attacks and vice versa.
             You end up with a net gain,you are obviously a winner and it was time to cheer. Luck still have a say in gambling, howsoever logical and mechanical you are.

QuoteWhen you're all finished with this I have an equally useful challenge for you all too...  How many fingers am I holding up behind my back?

Great. I expected same level of answers.

Quote[size=0px]How can you not reverse engineer something if what you are given to work with is results?[/size]

Because what will work to gain in a bad session can not work in inversely proportional good one, if you understand the meaning of reverse engineering.

No. I am expecting all "intelligent" members to only look for favorable sessions to show their expertise. Anybody can win in favorable conditions with a little dash of progression but how about these harsh conditions that ensure losses in long run?
           Any taker?

I guess that all so-called Veterans, MM experts and Daily new system (so-called) writers will run away from this topic than doing anything constructive and a few will try to reverse engineer the data to find an exploitable thing.
               Remember, we do not know before playing a session that it is going to be horrible or lovely.
So your strategy should not be tailor made for bad sessions only.
It should be great for very favorable sessions as well.


Best of luck to all.

Check again, MBB.


                   

Say we are betting a Dozen and have such Wins and Losses in 60 spins:
1ST Session:  L L L L L W L L L L L W L L L L  L L L L L L  L L L L L L W L
                       L W L L W L L W L L L L L L L L L W L L L L L L W W W L W L
2ND Session: WLWLLWLLWLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
                         LLLLWLWLLLLLLLLLWWLLLWWWWWWWLL
3RD Session: LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLWWWWLWLLW
                        LWLLLLLLLLLLLLLWLLLLLLWLLLLLLW
4TH Session: LLLLLWLLLLLLWLLLLLLLLLWLWLLLLL
                        WWLLLLLLLLWLLWLLLLWWLLWLLLWLLL

Can you beat all 4 sessions or create any strategy that can handle all four sessions without ever betting above 100 units? There should be only one and unambiguous method, for all of them.

My Reportcard of high probability predictions:

Total Bets suggested: 18
Won:                              14
Lost:                                3
Void:                                1

Quote from: Albalaha on September 08, 2013, 05:02:41 AM
Most Probable winner of the day:
American Football:
Oakland Raiders at Indianapolis Colts

Bet on the win of: Indianapolis Colts
Sunday, 8th September, 18:00

Yesssssssss
Won.[smiley]aes/thumb.png[/smiley]

Most Probable winner of the day:
American Football:
Oakland Raiders at Indianapolis Colts

Bet on the win of: Indianapolis Colts
Sunday, 8th September, 18:00

Quote the match between:              Brazil vs Australia
Bet on the win of Brazil.

Yessssssssssss. Won

Quote*You can also opt Over 2.5 goals which is looking obvious

       Won, this one too........[smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

It is true Tom that you made me think that sports betting can also be a nice approach to earn apart from roulette or baccarat.