Hey GreatG.....
                       If you make a claim and feel that has some worth, the onus to prove that lies on you.

Bet on the win of Crystal Palace

in Crystal Palace Versus Brighton

Time: 19:45

You need to study mathematics fully. Don't you know about dispersion, standard deviation etc?

If you do not understand statistics/mathematics/probability you are just like a blind man claiming to shoot a flying bird. Those who are aware of that are having eyes at least.

QuoteGive me the next worst number and I'll run it again.

Captain,
           It will be useless doing so. Since you have yet to come up with what exactly u did with number 3 challenge. Put that first in open here, if u have really beaten it or admit that you claimed falsely.

I think he needs to see this graph:
http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/albalaha's-open-challenge-can-anyone-beat-the-worst/msg1340/#msg1340




GGasoft, 
         Go to kids and tell your variance killer stories. Here you are only making fun of yourself. You are, in no way, know how to handle variance/dispersion. You are winning where flat bet is winning and losing where flat bet is losing. What is your merit? You need to study kindergarten books on statistics/probability and mathematics of gambling.
               Do not make my topic a circus with clowns jumping around. I will delete all further posts of urs here having no substance. If you want to prove  your win, write a separate topic. In my observation and as per Bayes opinion too, u have only lost it very badly.

Can someone else please explain GGasoft that what he is doing is a kind of reverse engineering and he has done nothing to beat the challenge? I think either he can't read what I am writing about his method or turned shameless.

You are a magician who knows since beginning that the first 700 spins where the bet of ours is winning even flat bet has to be bet by $100 chips. Over-smartness sometimes make you look foolish. You are a loser. Anybody can see the graph of  your session and graph created by Victor by flat bet and bets made by you at "hot spots" and thereafter.
           Play the same regression all over 15k spins, you will start oozing blood. As I said earlier, stop fooling yourself.

GGasoft,
           Do not forget that it is not humor section. You have only done a joke by your so-called method here which is open to everyone to see and evaluate. Your so-called methods and test reports will be intact but no more jokes here, please.

Captain,
     

Quote  Play it like a tournament.   DUH!

It is not so simple thing to do. Someone who will beat this challenge with a well defined and logical money management will be a real maestro of this game. So far, nobody is even close to do anything like this. A few merely talk of their assumptions that this should beat it and that should beat it but they are far from the reality and if they test their raw idea upon this challenge, they will get how hollow they are.
                     A few like GGasoft are creating comical solution of this and rest are just making assumptions about various possibilities.
                So, we can only beat a session which is either hitting always below break even or where we are getting wins in cluster? I do not think anyone will ever beat this challenge. It seems all have surrendered to the difficulties that it offers.

This theoretical Dispersion killing is useless in practical gambling. Be realistic.

Ad,
      You have no right to say so. It is my challenge. You claimed to win this but shying away to show how. Further, I have never claimed to have beaten this particular challenge.

QuoteThe only way to kill it is not fighting with it......

          So you better stay out of this challenge. Your philosophy teaches you that. 

You claim to be a dispersion killer and running away to see the dispersion. If you have any real approach that can work in such bets, write that clearly, otherwise try your luck somewhere else.

Even I trust whatever u say, u r not winning the challenge in any sensible manner, not even close to that. Your method is meant for better times than average and the challenge is just meant for opposite of that. If I remove first 700 spins, your method and your master both will start crying. You can not guess whether there will be good times or bad, in future, so u will always play with an identical method. Here, you are becoming a clairvoyant (some call it smarta## too) who knows from beginning that first 700 spins going to be good and he bets heavily there and his sixth sense stops him to bet big later.
        What a master and what a student!!!!!!!!!!!!!