Look. I know it is not feasible to try 15k spins with 100 chips in hand. Will 5000 chips be enough to you?  My curiosity is to see how wisely you can bet in such adverse cases to ensure a net win without going too down in loss.

Good. I like your spirit. 

In the match of
Manchester United vs. Chelsea
Bet on the win of "Manchester United"
and "more than 2.5 goals" in the match.

Bet on the win of "Liverpool"


in
Liverpool vs. Everton
Match time: 13:30






Bet on the win of "Juventus"
in
Juventus vs. Palmero
Match time: 14:00

I have never made any claim on this data.

These were bets on "win" only of the respective matches.However, I do other type of betting too.

Tottenham and Arsenal both won.     


100% winnings in all predictions, so far.

Bet on the win of Tottenham


In Tottenham Vs Southampton
Time: 15:00




Bet on the win of Arsenal
in QPR Vs. Arsenal
Time: 17:30

Result:   Yessssssssss
              It won.

Everybody is only speaking of their opinions. No illustrations has come up yet. What is the use of this challenge? The purpose is to learn how you handle continuous variance in such a span. If a strategy wins this challenge, without reverse engineering the W/L in it, that should win in any other number in long term.
                                  Whoever claims to beat it, be it Adulay, Flat_ino or Greatgrampa need to illustrate their idea working on this data openly here. Otherwise, the claim to beat it with all these abovesaid methods, can be safely considered as imaginary if not false.

Bet on Sheff Utd to win the match
    in the football match on 3rd May, i.e. today
between Sheff Utd  vs. Yeovil
time: 19:45

QuoteYou could try using up to 4 methods. Select a bet with the 1^st method then quickly run through the other 3 methods to see if there is an opposite selection. If there's no opposing selection then place your bet. If there is an opposing selection then select a bet with the 2^ndmethod then quickly run through the other 3 methods to see if there is an opposite selection. If there's no opposing selection then place your bet. If there is an opposing selection then select a bet with the 3^rd method then quickly run through the other 3 methods to see if there is an opposite selection. If there's no opposing selection then place your bet, etc. If there are opposing selections through all the methods then skip the spin.

Will it really help? This is the newest fallacy in the town.

Can anybody simulate Flat's Idea? I do not think it will work perfectly here. How about GG claim?

How much bankroll and table limits you want?

Try from 1 to 100.