Happy Easter to all contributors. The place just does not belong to Victor so he should not be burdened alone. It is our recreation club, university and ware house, all-in-one.

Great. 
                  We need to do this every month. Even if 20 of us come forward for voluntary donations every month, hosting issue will never trouble Victor.

Good Job, Steph.
                   It is a pity that such a forum doesn't have regular donors and the admin need to worry for such small amounts. I have seen a few forums that charge  $50/month per member and members pay. Why? Because they talk serious stuffs that help all to better their skills and chances.
            I think hosting issue solved, for now.

Just sent you $6, buddy, via paypal. Long live BS.CC !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My view is, keep the forum open with everything except coding on demand and bots.

I don't have paypal. I can pay by moneybookers right now, if it can help.

You may see illusionary advantages but the fact is  your chip placed upon any EC bet in roulette is always covering 18 numbers.

This test is very basis of all my methods. Van Keleen had put a very realistic test and a system to be successful or even playable should comply with this test.

Quote[size=78%]Bot by itself is not betting very often, and usually progression is not very long.[/size]


But there is possibility that DC will happen in middle of any progression.
I am aware of that and im taking that risk.

Not only bot players have this risk but it is dangerous for manual playing too. We need to complain this to bv.
without talking about bots, lol.

I understand everything. You should not make statements which your not sure of yourself. In a favorable session, even the silliest stuff wins. What are you trying to establish?
              Everything is proportional in gambling, be it flat bet or martingale. Every technique has its advantages and disadvantages, in different situations. Do you have anything to counter this statement of mine, which I am saying since beginning?

You came, made a statement and when your statement felt flat, new set of excuses. Anyways, Flat betting won't win in long run. House edge ensures this. You need to use progression (mild or harsh, choice is yours), in attempt to win. If you are lucky enough, you won't get huge unbearable variance and ultimately win, otherwise losses are meant for you.
                                         Trying to perpetually win with flat bet is like trying to paddle a boat with hands.

If something wins flat bet, in a particular session it is the quality of the session. Any positive progression like parlay and reverse labouchere can also do very well (depends upon frequency and consecutive wins).
                 Do not talk of dream sessions. Being realistic, most sessions will suffer variance/dispersion and house edge will kill flat betting, than not.

I have dozens of trackers/bots made to see any bet in long run. Advise this to others.


         Flat bet doesn't win in long run by any well defined method. Prove it and I will stop writing or advising anything on any forum for my entire life. 

Bonus abuse doesn't mean winning a bonus. If you are getting and winning bonuses in a professional manner, that amounts to abuse. Deposit bonus is not wise, in any manner, if it asks for more than 10 times wagering on deposit+bonus money. If u can win such bonuses for sure, you can crush casinos without any bonus, very well.
       I have done bonus abuse many times and many casinos rejected any further bonus offers to me after winning one: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=347.0


                         Two three casinos did not pay me on one pretext or other but mostly they pay bonus winners.

Regression, progression or flat betting, nothing is perfect and none helps in winning in long term with any surety. You can't use anyone blindly considering that the best.