If something wins flat bet, in a particular session it is the quality of the session. Any positive progression like parlay and reverse labouchere can also do very well (depends upon frequency and consecutive wins).
                 Do not talk of dream sessions. Being realistic, most sessions will suffer variance/dispersion and house edge will kill flat betting, than not.

I have dozens of trackers/bots made to see any bet in long run. Advise this to others.


         Flat bet doesn't win in long run by any well defined method. Prove it and I will stop writing or advising anything on any forum for my entire life. 

Bonus abuse doesn't mean winning a bonus. If you are getting and winning bonuses in a professional manner, that amounts to abuse. Deposit bonus is not wise, in any manner, if it asks for more than 10 times wagering on deposit+bonus money. If u can win such bonuses for sure, you can crush casinos without any bonus, very well.
       I have done bonus abuse many times and many casinos rejected any further bonus offers to me after winning one: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=347.0


                         Two three casinos did not pay me on one pretext or other but mostly they pay bonus winners.

Regression, progression or flat betting, nothing is perfect and none helps in winning in long term with any surety. You can't use anyone blindly considering that the best.

QuoteI will pick some examples to illustrate it ...

You will give suitable examples for your "regression" and I can give those not so suitable for you, so what does it prove? Everything is proportional. No betselection or money management is better than all others in all situations. Do not confuse yourself and others. It seems everybody is enjoying creating an "indigenous set of fallacies".
                                Public forums are sadly not growing as places to educate and learn from each other than "fallacy mongering group", showing new approaches of losing money faster than ever in gambling.

Sputnik,
              Why don't you demonstrate how u will do in this session with your "regression" while playing on "black"? With Flt betting, anyone see that I am winning betting on Red only. I am not a fan of flat betting but you seem to be awestruck with "regression". Now do that and prove your point and educate all of us, how it is better than flat betting here.

I am playing Red and you are playing black. I am doing flat betting and you go by regression. Hopefully, it will sprinkle some water on you.

[attachimg=1]

Really? I can put a few real smartlive sessions here where I will play an EC flat bet and you with regression. Ok?

I am busy into improving the bot further with adding more stuffs as I am not satisfied with the existing average winning per spin. It is not true that it can be played only upon very big sessions. Ophis, as said, is already using it, for weeks, in continuity.

Quote[size=78%]I would change point one in this topic where regression is superior then flat betting ...[/size]


With regression you always hold a profit after each win and you capitalize more on hot strikes then flat betting.
You also capitalize on zig zag distribution where flat betting break even.
Regression put you more into the positive side of things when flat betting even out ...

Nothing is inferior or superior and none has proven advantage over all others. Every betselection and progressions/MMs are proportional and work better than other in different conditions.

QuoteMaybe for you it is, I never finish a session down, as long as I stick to my play I come out ahead, every time.

        Oh. Really? I forget that you can fly too. 
          Why don't you guide us all how to win all sessions? You should earn a million overnight playing with E100 chips minimum.


P.S.: You should always stick to your play, if it can win in all probabilities.

Vic,
          You can't compound so easily in gambling, it is not a credit card interest. lol. You do not know whether if u win in first two sessions and rushed say 1000 unit to 1200, if u raise unit size to 1.2 now and lose two-three session consecutively, how will compounding work?
                Compounding can work only if you can win every session which is impossible.

QuoteIf your strategy works, you should actually start with the very very minimal unit, then start compounding in the grounds of your positively crafted bet in order to make your base unit grow over time.Risking half a million to make a million doesn't sound like a solidly based strategy to me.

Even the best methods may get big drawdowns, momentarily. One can not be lucky enough to earn a million units with 100 units in pocket. It will be like an 80 years old man making a world tour by bicycle, in a week. Keep realistic targets. We are not into Hogwarts school of magic.

Even if you have a technique that is a holy grail (WIN MORE AND LOSE LESS), you are not going to become a millionaire overnight with 100 chips bankroll. You can just be safe and ahead in bankroll slowly with a grail. It is my firm belief and experience. If everybody is looking for anythng that will win in all probability, in every session, he is trying to make a ladder to go haven.
              If u  want to earn a million with a real holy grail, you need to risk at least half of that from your own pocket.

Victor,
      I may sound a little "bragging" but people are still blank about how a holy grail be made and I have came across many of them, rather created a few. When I say this, people come up with shouting over me, "he is liar". In my definition of an HG, it is nothing but a strategy that wins for sure, if u keep on playing, sessions after sessions. Nothing can beat 100% of probabilities because if u cover 50% of wheel, 50% is always standing against you and you can do nothing to stop them coming better than what u r betting at. You can not chose a "better" betselection, that can fail randomness. All bet selections and progressions/money management techniques work in a particular type of probability and other probabilities that can not be covered can always strike.
        Reading randomness or trigger betting etc can't work to WIN MORE AND LOSE LESS. They are new varieties of "fallacies". If you don't believe me, code them into a bot and run over a simulation of 1 million spins. It will fall flat.
                House edge ensures losses with flat bet, in long run. No betselection can get you to win flat bet, in long run. I am making this statement and challenge everybody to disprove me.