Great Job Katilla,
                  You have done a fabulous job. Let me find one more real session of similar nature. If you beat that too, with same set of rules.
              Adulay,
                  Check Kattila's excels. What he is doing is very fine example of "extreme variance control".
            Nick,
                  Thanks for your inputs. You have proved that even simple concepts may earn huge. Can you compute net profit with all three dozens played throughout the 185 spins, with the same progression?

we need to play only the particularly and comparatively worse dozen. One strategy that u like to play on a dozen that works on good as well as bad situations like katilla and nick came up with.

Read my Signature.

QuoteI am in the work to try to find a progression   which will survive a case like  65/135 in 200 spins, regardless how they fall.

Any visible progress in this?

For Katilla and Nick,
         another session. This time, fight with second dozen,in the way you did third dozen in the earlier sample.
[attachimg=1]

Thanks Victor, Katilla and Nick.
Kats, your style resembles 90% of mine.
Nick, Your progression did too good but it may go ugly with little more bad session.

Quote from: Ralph on March 18, 2013, 05:03:02 AM
More than 50%  hit rate if flat betting or  more than 50% winning stakes, if it is not flat. Could we win the higher bets less than 50% can work.

That is is the main motive of progression. To earn more in lesser hits.

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on March 18, 2013, 03:36:58 AM
50% is not enough in my opinion, you would need to use some clever MM and have a huge bankroll to make 50% work for you.

55-60% is better.

I said same thing:

QuoteA hit rate above 50%

Dear Friends,
          I am putting a real session of smartlive casino having 185 spins. for those, who are not familiar with this data, let me tell u that the session starts from lowest right side and progresses right to left and goes upwards.
        Our betselection is static/fixed: we are betting third dozen only. You can see that there are 56 hits of third dozen (25-36). Play it with your favorite Money management and let's see who can do it better.
[attachimg=1]

A hit rate above 50%, is required to earn fearlessly and consistently.

Ralph,
   Can you illustrate this labby on a sample session of mine?

Quote from: spike on March 16, 2013, 10:14:33 PM
Sure, just draw up a 15 step Labby, works every time.

Nothing works every time. Fibonacci and Labouchere, both rely upon a percent of winnings among its trials (not less than 35%) to get a net win. If you do not win at least 6 times, in 15 steps, labby and fibo, both can kill you.

QuoteNo one in here or on any other forum have a real winning system.

                This issue was raised by Esoito too that many of us are merely butterflies, moving from forum to forum, looking for a panacea. I answered that I am not a butterfly at least because there is no nectar available on all such spaces (I feel that). The problem is not that people do not have winning systems but rather a winning system is not shared by most. Yet, you may get a spark that can lead to big fire. I believe that if you can analyse things in larger prospective, you have only two options in gambling:
1. To never go for it and save your hard earned money; or
2. Create a feasible way of gambling where you have fair chances to win
          I preferred later and I do have winning systems, not just one but many.

   Well said, Gizmo.

It is an open space. If someone writes a method, he should illustrate that on one two real sessions. A method is subjected to insult if it has nothing worth considering. Good and workable ideas are always welcomed by the majority. It is spontaneous. Use of filthy language and personal attacks should be avoided.