Ralph,
   Can you illustrate this labby on a sample session of mine?

Quote from: spike on March 16, 2013, 10:14:33 PM
Sure, just draw up a 15 step Labby, works every time.

Nothing works every time. Fibonacci and Labouchere, both rely upon a percent of winnings among its trials (not less than 35%) to get a net win. If you do not win at least 6 times, in 15 steps, labby and fibo, both can kill you.

QuoteNo one in here or on any other forum have a real winning system.

                This issue was raised by Esoito too that many of us are merely butterflies, moving from forum to forum, looking for a panacea. I answered that I am not a butterfly at least because there is no nectar available on all such spaces (I feel that). The problem is not that people do not have winning systems but rather a winning system is not shared by most. Yet, you may get a spark that can lead to big fire. I believe that if you can analyse things in larger prospective, you have only two options in gambling:
1. To never go for it and save your hard earned money; or
2. Create a feasible way of gambling where you have fair chances to win
          I preferred later and I do have winning systems, not just one but many.

   Well said, Gizmo.

It is an open space. If someone writes a method, he should illustrate that on one two real sessions. A method is subjected to insult if it has nothing worth considering. Good and workable ideas are always welcomed by the majority. It is spontaneous. Use of filthy language and personal attacks should be avoided.

Nothing increases the accuracy of predictions. This statement is a fallacy.

Razor,
        You are going in correct direction but nothing works without money management.

Quote from: Ralph on March 14, 2013, 05:40:39 AM
In any largerr sample of numbers  0-36  there are more even numbers than odd, but it is not to any help as we do not get paid for all even numbers which hit, betting outside.

        Where do u get such superb knowledge from?

Vic,
      All these theories just sound good. Can you apply these approaches to make any "system" or any defined way of playing that can win with flat bet? Answer would be "no".

Flat bet can be profitable only if: you are lucky enough to get more of wins than losses. Since the game is not predictable, you can't expect to win flat bet consistently ever, with any strategy that you make. Do not forget that ball comes to rest in a pocket, randomly and not as per your strategy. You can only expect and speculate, you can't predict.

Razor,
         If it is too tough to be calculated manually, how do u know whether it is a grail, without testing extensively? If it looks like a grail to you, take help of a programmer to get it coded in a tracker/bot. Get it tested upon a variety of data. If it goes in positive, you can think of using it in a real casino.
            I can recommend you two programmers who can do it anonymously. PM me, if u r serious.

Flat must have experienced that casinos in Macau even allow using cameras and video cameras openly. Where is Steve's hidden roulette computer? He should shift to Macau.

Quotewithout mathematical proof there's always going to be the possibility that the next bunch of spins could see a reversal of fortune. The problem is that if you don't know the mechanism by which you have gained the apparent edge, there's always the danger that it could slip away.

All methods discussed here forget this blunt truth and nobody is there to talk about how to cope this.

Flat betting and consistent winning = negative house edge for casino. Impossible, so far, theoretically as well as practically.

I told you guys that I live far from land based casinos. Once I got an offer from a local businessman to play against him. He will be from casino side. All winnings or losses of casino will be his and vice-versa. We can play with live dealer or RNG, whatever we wish. I liked the idea but could never try. In many countries, they even run casinos (specially illegal ones), this way.