Ralph,
   I know you have contributed a lot here, specially by creating  your bv bot and giving that to free. This is my last piece of research. I am working on handling the worst bet. It is but natural that if u can beat the worst performing betselections, u have won the game itself. I am telling one thing very frankly, whatever is being taken as "systems" on various forums are merely a different style of playing. None have any in-built advantage or any logic. If you can beat the worst, u can beat anything.

21 is not a parameter, it is an example of worse session for a particular number. Oscar Grind doesn't work in such cases and you can check yourself in my open challenge. You have L/W to see that. Let other people try with newer ideas.

Excellent thinking. Please execute these things as early as possible.

I am not here to talk of philosophy. Which progression can handle 21 Ws in 1000 spins in the best possible manner, upon one straight up number? Oscar Grind is in no way playable for such cases. Unless you are lucky enough to get hits at smaller intervals, it is suicidal.

Ralph,
Oscar Grind is not very good progression as you seem to be awestruck with that. Oscar Grind works on a presumption that if initial delays come in a betselection, later it will come in clusters. When gaps are big between one hit to another, it only fools up increasing bets.


MBB,
    check another thousand spins.

Buddy,
     I appreciate that you at least tried to input your best but sadly it won't work in most of the situations. If you try L/W thing with  your progression, u can try this: http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/albalaha's-open-challenge-can-anyone-beat-the-worst/


Start from spin no. 1001 and play till 2000, if u can get any positive results.

MG aka albertojonas,
               If you can recall, I had a special section meant for me in rf.cc : http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?board=32.0
What happened to all those? The forum was sold and my section was dumped and I was banned despite voting in my favor. My exclusive section had only exclusive info and that was the most successful private section, if you see viewership and positive debates and no private section ever formed by Victor for any individual could reach those heights.
               This forum's sale-exclusive section deletion and my banning made me think that it is futile to contribute your best in such spaces, which can be sold and a scammer can delete all those fearing threat to his so called cheating devices. Further, I know that what is being written as "systems" on these public forums are nothing else but either raw material or brainstorming ideas or copy+paste of published stuffs from somewhere. Nobody talks of really workable methods which he himself plays.
                   I started my private forum thinking I will have an exclusive group that will really help each other in forming the best. I was wrong again. People again started copy+paste. A few started talking of Martingale as ultimate remedy.
               I only believe in technical debates that can bring about something which is not already there, like this one. You can see that there is absolutely no positive input.
                                        Everyone will have a true holy grail if the present query be answered but I am sure it will not be done. Nobody will even attempt to do that honestly.
                        The forum is full of those who can copy+paste stuffs or pull legs of each other or suggest Martingale as the ultimate strategy.

I think, if u start some topic, you can moderate it too. No separate section required for that.

Hey Guys,
        When I came to this forum and saw the general flow of it, I got that "this is just another bunch of frustrated gamblers" with no one to offer anything workable. The most read methods are "7 on 1" and "pattern breaker". Nobody ever addresses the real issues like handling variance or any innovative MM or any betselection which can be more logical than just betting anything randomly. Those who understand randomness and probability very well could not offer any real world solution.
                   I know things will remain same and even after the forums will run for 20 more years, no one will come closer to anything near perfect. Do you feel that by writing all these so called "systems" you are helping the community? You are rather creating newer fallacies and making losers lose even more.
          I know that it is very tough to digest that someone is having a true solution or what we call "Holy Grail" considering the volatile nature of game specially roulette.
           My signature is the essence of my HG. I can't win every session but I am a winner overall and that is sufficient for me to call it an HG.
Anybody can win if he understands how to handle extreme variance, how to use MM cleverly and where to surrender. Whenever I tried to talk about them, kids got upset and said this is a scammer. Why serious talks that can solve issues? We prefer to lose than discuss difficult aspects of the game. A few said they won't play difficult sessions at all, as if they have a choice. A few said, it is not possible to do anything. Lots of noises and techniques but nothing pursuable.

The way to pick bets in that bot is beyond  your imagination. Don't waste your time over that.  Tell me if u have any workable idea on this issue.

It was not only 1 million spins but more than 10 million spins. Can you guys find anything else doing something like that? That is a very complex bot method that works thousands of probabilities together to find suitable bets. That is not meant for playing manually or in real casino. I am asking for this MM for real casino play.

Quote from: ADulay on February 06, 2013, 02:33:43 AM
What will the person with the "correct" answer get for all this work?

AD

So this is what a Global Moderator speaks of and you guys expect me to give my grails for free.

Victor is a fair player. He will pay back with his work.

It will work in a few and won't in another few. As usual.

I believe that in 1369 spins (37  cycles of 37 numbers), not just every number appears but most numbers will get near break even too. Barely 3-4 numbers can be away from that, that is normal.