Can someone who is member of other forums like rf.cc, rf.net, rf.com, GG carry my challenge there as copy+paste (alongwith the text file or link?)

One can even put this challenge on forums with different language than English.

Sogett,
        If you feel this can work, u can have a test of this by following way. Open the txt file in excel. Start doing your money management from Spin No. 677 (since it is winning before this even flat bet). If you get a positive balance anywhere after that, you may continue to check whether your ideas keep on working or not.


                 So far, I am only seeing suggestions regarding how to play it. Nobody has come up yet with testing the idea that he is talking about himself. Come up with testing (at least you can manually do 200-300 spins) results. That will bring guidance for all.

QuoteThis thread is going waaaay off topic. 

No harm if useful discussions are coming through any source.

Exactly. Now I can stop distractions from a serious debate started by me.

Exactly,
      I feel that each of us should honestly try to contribute here. $5-$10 a month is nothing if someone dreams of earning from gambling. This place provides us much more than any book can ever do.

I have already raised the question of the effectiveness of "hit and run" in a separate topic in "Math & Statistics" section.

Do you mean to say, two is enough?

Is it limited to two hits only or we may go further with it as well?

 I have windows 7 and while installing, got similar errors. i tried to play it upon bv european but couldn't. can it analyse text data as MST ?

Can anyone report its working?

Esoito,
            My this question was meant for Bayes only, who can be taken as an expert of mathematics and statistics ( and I think Victor and you must be thinking him as same if he is moderator of Math & Statistics section) and not for mass debate. This leads to frustration of an expert opinion, as Bayes himself said: I told myself I'm not going to participate in these debates regarding hit & run, I've spent a good deal of time and effort in the past, not only [/size]arguing[/size] against the merit of it (showing that there is no logical basis for its claimed effectiveness), but also [/size]demonstrating[/size] through simulations that it doesn't work.


                                      If you want to get this topic running as public debate, I am afraid it will again become a misleading debate with no conclusion ever.

why not bet 10x for a 3 after you see a 3 with progression 1111111111,2222222222,3333333333,etc





Try your methodology after #676 and try to win anywhere your way. You can try to do this manually too.

Tell me something, have you already found the solution to this problem?

I want to see whether any intelligent and experienced member have any solution to this. As I said, even the most unintelligent player can win if his bet hits more and losses less. This challenge is like a hurdle race. Is it the level and standard of so-called "experienced" members?
                  If you can't face and win variance attack, your system is no system. You are merely trying your luck.

Thanks Bayes,
            I have got my answer from a source(yourself), that I can trust. Now, I am 100% sure that hit and run is nothing. If you are lucky you can win with everything but this gives no advantage over regular use.
               Locking debate.

QuoteVictor used the word "Example" in his post.

Indeed. Let him do it on my data too. That would be a clearer illustration.

He HAS illustrated it clearly.  Even I can understand it!Be more specific in identifying exactly what you're having trouble understanding.
   Esoito, I hope you understand the meaning and distinctions between "defining" and "illustrating". Victor has just defined this concept and not illustrated it.

QuoteHello dear Sumit, I think the best option is for you to post 37 spins, telling me a number with 2 or more hits for me to apply it on.

Here are your random numbers:
4 35 9 36 15 4 32 36 35 1 10 13 7 12 26 8 5 7 22 12 7 10 36 26 5 25 20 33 16 28 35 16 25 11 4 25 20 taken from random.org now, bet let's say 16.