Your last progression was disastrous and it got proved right here by coding. If you can beat all these sessions with a single progression you are at par with me or even better. May God help you.

A nice democratic decision.

LAST SESSION: DT 24TH JAN 2017

WINS : 88
LOSSES:105

L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W


           

QuoteThey do not return the stake, which is on the table during disconection.

One can lose money only if a result comes. Usually result comes even when you get disconnected but you do not see that. I have even won in disconnection spins. Take a disconnection as a pause only and it can not do any other harm. It can not better or worsen the odds that are static. Rest is your luck only.

Try to do all with one predefined approach that you can play realistically.

I do not know what you did but any method can work on any particular bad looking case. If anything works to get a net profit is same ideas played all sessions, that is worth serious thought.

Quote from: ADulay on January 07, 2017, 06:12:19 PM
Albalaha,

  If I were to change those "W" and "L" to "Bank" and "Player" would the overall effect be the same?

  Thanks.

  AD

You can consider W to any EC and L to its counterpart like Bank and Player.

          An average regular player playing 3-4 hours twice a week religiously for over 30 years can see 3,75,000 spins approx. I test over this many spins in a day. I have been doing this for last 8 years, at least 300 days a year. Now you can count my experience versus an "old school player's". If you think this is an aggregation, I tested over 10 million spins with ophis within 3 days. I have dozens of bots and trackers made by Victor(VLS), madmax(michael),Ophis, Stef, Nickmsi and many others exclusively meant for me.
                        Experience alone doesn't matter unless one is educated enough to analyse the cause and effect. A patient suffering from an incurable disease may only feel the pain and troubles associated, he can not cure himself with his experience. Doing Harsh sessions is all about "not seeing pink only" and being aware of what can happen with you. Those claim to beat the game with merely their wise selections are either crook or ignorant. Every bloody player will face worst of times despite being the smartest behind around.

I play and simulate in excel. I try to pick the worst( in different types of challenges) sessions as Harsh and the point where I get at net profit session ends. A few sessions are imaginary too and a few provided by a friend. Few are so harsh that they can not appear realistically or in other words you need lots of extreme badluck to witness them.
          The motive behind compiling such diverse set of challenge is to see if my approach is really dynamic enough or not to handle all.

Harsh Session #28:
                                        87 Wins vs 105 Losses: Very tricky session


L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W

I can't locate the chat.

Ha Ha. It went repetitive and assertive hence closed.

QuoteHowever, baccarat is not a game of great difficulty if one is comfortable with it and has the vision to play along with the shoe.  It is tons easier than black jack and other games where a gambler must beat the house. 

Lol!!!
You or Gizmotron can not beat even simple random sessions without much dispersion and you are saying it is not a difficult game to beat. Anybody claiming to beat baccarat(or any game of pure chance) by "intelligent picks" seeing trends or patterns is pretty novice and ignorant of basic mathematics. Sadly common sense is not so common. It is not EASY to beat baccarat in permutations and combinations of wins and losses coming where losses has to surpass wins by count or house fees. You and Gizmo are making people believe that one can simply pick bets having better chances to win than lose but not able to prove your point in any manner.

             I think this debate is going pretty repeatitive with same set of arguments being offered hence closing the topic.

Disconnections make no difference if you understand that every other spin gives an independent result. You may consider disconection as merely a break between your trials and nothing else.

Quote from: Gizmotron on December 31, 2016, 12:50:40 AM
Nice try. These bone headed headshrinkers are as pathetic as they can be, all be it total ignorance. They project their logic as a cause of problem gambling.

Wow! Calling a purely scientific and mathematical observation pathetic shows ignorance is lying somewhere else. Relying upon Predictions, forecast, Trends, patterns in a purely random game or a wishful thinking that one can "pick" better bets and win flat by any methodology is pretty childish.
Thankfully we are not here talking of intutions, precognitions, numerology or occult to help us win. Seeing tends and predicting in an interrelated events and in a totally random game where every bet is totally independent are poles apart.

May God help you.